User talk:WikiBayer

Welcome to Wikidata, WikiBayer!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

2519680869

Undeletion request for Karen Becker (Q137564249)

The item is about Dr. Karen Becker. I was in the process of adding external IDs that demonstrate notability. For example, Library of Congress Authorities ID (P244) which is instance of (P31) Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316) https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2011188896.html See also her book "The forever dog Life" on the NY Times Bestseller list https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/2024/06/23/ Piecesofuk (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Do you have more than the LCAuth identifier? The link "https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/2024/06/23/" is a promotional link and does not function as a source. WikiBayer (talk) 07:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for もんじーじー lock

Hello,

Also : User:シャーヤー, User talk:さんぱち, User:~2025-43798-27, User:~2026-6380, User:Ponkinsk and User:Okimochiwa
Same person. jaWP : sockpuppet of HEATHROW (for LTA)

Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 10:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request for SESA SYSTEMS (Q137900182)

Hello, I believe this deletion may be based on a misunderstanding. Wikidata does not require encyclopedic notability like Wikipedia.

The deleted item (SESA SYSTEMS) was a real French company, identified by official identifiers (SIREN, SIRET, VAT number) and sourced using official registers and the company website.

According to Wikidata:Notability, companies are acceptable when they can be clearly identified and referenced, which was the case here. Could you please reconsider or restore the item? Thank you. Sesasystems (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

You need a reputable source WikiBayer (talk) 11:03, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification.

The company is registered in the official French business register (INSEE – SIRENE) with a valid SIREN number, which provides an independent and authoritative source.

It can be seen here: https://www.bodacc.fr/pages/annonces-commerciales/?disjunctive.typeavis&disjunctive.familleavis&disjunctive.publicationavis&disjunctive.region_min&disjunctive.nom_dep_min&disjunctive.numerodepartement&sort=dateparution&q.registre=registre:443592456#resultarea

or here : https://www.infogreffe.fr/entreprise/sesa-systems/443592456/9aaab889-e7aa-4610-8c98-93f2cc2ad8fe

The company also participated in different exhibitions like this one: https://rouen.sepem-industries.com/partner/9c4ffb07-004c-ee11-9937-000d3a4cc0c5/sesa-systems

I can add this reference to the item if it is restored.

Best regards. Sesasystems (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion Request for Q138196596

Hi, ich war noch nicht fertig mit dem Eintrag. Ich war gerade erst dabei externe Quellen, u. a. von der Publikation Werben und Verkaufen, als Quellen hinzuzufügen, um Relevanz darzustellen.

Gerade genannte Quellen sind: https://www.wuv.de/Archiv/So-tickt-die-Zukunft-Dokyo-auf-der-%22The-Next-Web-Conference%22 https://www.wuv.de/Archiv/Wie-man-mit-Messenger-f%C3%BCr-die-Ehe-f%C3%BCr-alle-wirbt Eichhof.me (talk) 11:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Das ist aber definitiv kein reputable quelle die ausreichend ist. WikiBayer (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Andorra

Given that the "Catalan Countries" do not exist and never have existed, how can anyone justify including Andorra in that entity which, I repeat, doesn't even exist? Where is this change justified? It's an entirely unjustified addition made by Catalan nationalists. So, is Northern Ireland part of the Republic of Ireland because there are Irish nationalists? And is Croatia part of Greater Hungary? This is intolerable. Lopezsuarez (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

There is no logic to what happened today. How can anyone justify saying that the Balearic Islands, the Valencian Community, or Andorra are part of the "Catalan Countries"? It's clear you don't understand the situation. Lopezsuarez (talk) 19:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request for Q138504349 & Q138504122

Hi @WikiBayer,

I’m requesting undeletion for:

• Q138504349 (Vanja Bertalan)
• Q138504122 (Human Interaction Company)

I’m closely connected to both subjects (I am Vanja / founder), and I understand the COI concern.

Notability (WD:N, criterion N2): there is substantial independent coverage:

• [Index.hr feature about Vanja/Human – https://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/pokrenuli-su-biznis-na-pocetku-ere-interneta-a-sad-osvajaju-i-americko-trziste/2200378.aspx]
• [Netokracija piece about web.burza → Human rebrand – https://www.netokracija.com/web-burza-human-rebranding-157627]
• [tportal feature/interview – https://www.tportal.hr/biznis/clanak/web-burza-oduvijek-je-bila-human-a-od-danas-se-tako-i-zove-foto-20190529]
• [tportal feature / Vanja as panel moderator for IAB Croatia / HURA board member – https://www.tportal.hr/biznis/clanak/dobar-los-zao-native-oglasavanje-u-2022-powered-by-iab-croatia-20220503]
• [Red Dot official project page for “Human” (award body) – https://www.red-dot.org/project/human-49228]
• [Webby official project page for “Human” (award body) – https://winners.webbyawards.com/2020/websites-and-mobile-sites/features-design/best-practices/121674/human-interaction-company]
• [AmCham Croatia covering Webby – https://www.amcham.hr/en/news/croatian-agency-human-won-webbys-best-practices-category]

Additional verification (roles):

• HURA announcement listing Vanja Bertalan as a member of the HURA board (Uprava): https://hura.hr/vijesti/andela-buljan-siber-nova-predsjednica-uprave-hura-e/
• MIXX jury lists where Vanja Bertalan is explicitly listed: [1]

Could you please restore the items so they can be recreated with conservative, referenced statements? Vanja Bertalan (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138679538 and Q138679465

Hello,

I noticed that the item for Daniel Peris Molina and LLM Pulse were deleted due to the notability policy.

I wanted to mention that LLM Pulse (the company I founded) has a profile on Crunchbase and other external references that could support notability. Also the same for me (Daniel Peris Molina)

Would it be possible to recreate the items with proper references?

Thank you for your time. Danielperis (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

You need a reputable not selfcreate source. Please not recreate. WikiBayer (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request for Q138877109 himRAAG

This item was deleted by WikiBayer for "Does not meet notability policy".

This item satisfies N2 (identifiers and sources) because there are multiple valid external identifiers:

• Spotify artist ID: https://open.spotify.com/artist/79mjISM2eHu96BNO8xZx6X
• IMDB ID: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm17416205/
• MusicBrainz: https://musicbrainz.org./artist/1790db6c-1573-4be1-a935-438e60a2df80
• Google Knowledge Panel exists as verified musical artist under name himRAAG : https://www.google.com/search?q=himRAAG+musical+artist

This item satisfies N3 (structural need) because the artist has active presence on multiple notable platforms including Spotify Editorial playlists and Jio Saavn Editorial playlists.

HimRAAG (talk) 18:04, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

per notability policy are a reputable not self created sources needed. Neither a search on Google nor on a trustworthy search engine returns any reputable results. Please read Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 20:27, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. The sources provided

are not self-created:

1. Google Knowledge Panel - This is created

and verified by Google's algorithm automatically.

No individual can create their own Knowledge

Panel. It requires third party verification

from Google itself.

2. IMDB page (nm17416205) - This was created

by a third party film production team for a

project, not by me. I have no editorial

control over it.

3. MusicBrainz - Community maintained

database, not self created.

4. Spotify Editorial playlists - These are

curated by Spotify's editorial team

independently. Artists cannot place themselves

on editorial playlists.

These are all third party verified sources

by major platforms. I request reconsideration.

HimRAAG (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

A reputable Source WikiBayer (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Can you please help me understand what this "reputable source" means. Like press release or something? HimRAAG (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Request undeletion of Q139503832 (Phil Kwok)

Hi WikiBayer,

Thanks for patrolling new items. I noticed you deleted Q139503832 as non-notable — I'm the subject (disclosed on my user page) and I'd like to respectfully ask you to reconsider. The item was mid- build when deleted (label only, no statements yet), which I realise looked like a promotional stub.

Notability case:

• Structural need (criterion 3): I am named as co-founder

 in the Wikipedia article w:en:EasyA and in
 w:en:List of unicorn startup companies. The existing Wikidata
 item for EasyA (Q137647082) needs a "founded by (P112)"
 statement pointing to my item.

• Serious and publicly available references (criterion 2),

 all independent third-party:

• • CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/30/uks-labour-hikes-capital-gains-tax-by-less-than-feared.html (names me as "Phil Kwok, co-founder of EasyA")
  • Nasdaq TradeTalks: https://www.nasdaq.com/videos/recent-developments-digital-asset-market-structure-and-how-it-could-take-shape
  • FinTech.TV (NYSE interview): https://fintech.tv/unlocking-the-future-how-easya-is-educating-a-billion-people-on-blockchain/
  • Pembroke College Cambridge (2024 Leading Alumni Award): https://www.pem.cam.ac.uk/college/news/2024-alumni-awards-winners-announced
  • University of Cambridge talks.cam: http://talks.cam.ac.uk/talk/index/165973

If restored, I commit to completing the item with full sourcing in this session rather than leaving it as a stub. Happy to provide the full planned statement list here first if you'd prefer to review before restoring.

Thanks for considering. Philkwok (talk) 13:21, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Q139679427 gelöscht?

Hallo, ich bin gerade zu Hause und kann mich nicht einloggen, ich hoffe, das geht auch so: Darf ich fragen, warum der Eintrag nicht den Relevanzkriterien entspricht? Die Firma ist zweifelsfrei ein "klar abgrenzbarer konzeptueller oder wirklicher Gegenstand, der mit glaubwürdigen und öffentlich verfügbaren Belegen beschrieben werden kann." Danke! ~2026-27572-39 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikidata:Self-promotion. Das ITem hat keinen einzigen reputablen nichtselbst erstellten Beleg der gemäß Wikidata:Notability/de ausreichend ist.

Belege sind nur Eigenwerbung WikiBayer (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Danke für die Erklärung. Ich hatte gedacht, dass die eine Quelle aus der Neuen Westfälischen reichen würde. Hier sind noch eine Reihe von anderen journalistischen Quellen, die sich direkt mit der Firma beschäftigen:

• https://www.it-business.de/bechtle-kauft-erp-spezialisten-a-484142/ Ein Artikel aus der Fachpresse zur Übernahme von Modus durch Bechtle
• Auch die FAZ hat damals über die Übernahme berichtet (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 26.03.2015, Nr. 72, S. 20). Einen Link hab ich nur zu einer Zeitschriftendatenbank: https://bib-voebb.genios.de/document/FAZ__ecacf93067db88e2e8db53d949c25b14eed8bee1
• Hier noch ein Bericht über einen der Gründer der Firma: https://www.westfalen-blatt.de/owl/kreis-guetersloh/guetersloh/von-modus-consult-auf-katamaran-1379361
• Und noch zwei weitere Artikel aus der Regionalpresse über das Unternehmen: https://www.nw.de/lokal/kreis_guetersloh/guetersloh/23215547_Guetersloher-Unternehmen-erweitert-Stammsitz-fuer-25-Millionen-Euro.html und https://www.nw.de/lokal/kreis_guetersloh/guetersloh/23225464_Guetersloher-IT-Firma-darf-erweitern-150-neue-Arbeitsplaetze-in-Sicht.html

Mir ist klar, dass das zum Beispiel nie für Wikipedia "reichen" würde. Aber mein Verständnis ist, dass es bei Wikidata ausreichend ist, wenn man die Existenz einer Organisation, Person, etc. durch unabhängige Quellen belegen kann. Und das sollte zumindest mit diesen Quellen doch möglich sein. Wenn Du so nett bist und das Item wieder herzustellen und in den Benutzernamensraum (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:MODUS_Consult) zu schieben, dann ergänze ich die Belege entsprechend. Danke! ~2026-27572-39 (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Darf ich hier nochmal freundlich nachfragen? ~2026-27572-39 (talk) 06:59, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Das alles ist hier nur ganz lokal. Übernaheme Bereicht ist jetzt auch nicht gerade ein Bericht über diese Firma, sondern über das Größere Unternehmen das die firma übernimmt. Ich sehe hier nichts ausreichedes. Wikidata ist keine Unternehmensdatenbank. WikiBayer (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Das verstehe ich nicht. Laut den Relevanzkriterien muss ein Objekt klar bestimmbar sein und es muss mit unabhängigen und öffentlichen Quellen belegbar sein. Dass ist natürlich bei diesem Unternehmen der Fall - und dass hier "nur" regional berichtet würde, wäre ebenfalls kein Löschgrund.

An wen kann ich mich denn wenden um Deine Entscheidung überprüfen zu lassen? ~2026-28809-33 (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Am besten nachfolgenden link aufrufen und durch lesen und statt Eigenwerbung zu betreiben konstruktiv mitarbeiten

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

AljonaTamm

Why did you block user AljonaTamm? She is a university student translating some Wikipedia articles as part of her homework. There is no way that this has anything to do with abusing multiple accounts. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

I took another look at it. It really doesn't seem to belong to the other account. The account has now been unlocked. WikiBayer (talk) 06:49, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139784411 deletion

Hi WikiBayer, You deleted Q139784411 (CommRelay FR) as "Hoax". The site exists at https://commrelay.fr and has been online since April 2026 as a French-speaking community for the video game Star Citizen. Could you point me to the exact notability criteria you applied so I can prepare better evidence before resubmitting? I want to avoid wasting your time with a deficient submission. Thanks for your patrol work. Commrelay (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Plesse read WD:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Got it, thanks! I'll focus on building CommRelay's reputation so that someday a fan or community member creates the item, the proper way. Commrelay (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Formal Request for Undeletion of Item Q138757120 (H.E. Dr. Omar AlMuthanna)

Formal Request for Undeletion of Item Q138757120 (H.E. Dr. Omar AlMuthanna) Almuthanna (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

why? WikiBayer (talk) 08:00, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Because I am a Senior Government Official in Dubai. Since 2008, I have served as the CEO of the Community Development Authority (CDA), which is the primary regulatory body for the social sector in Dubai.

​Under Wikidata's notability policy for Public Administration, my role is notable because:

​I manage a major government entity (CDA) with significant public impact.

​I have been instrumental in pioneering social sector laws (such as Law No. 12 of 2017).

​My status is verified by the official Dubai Government portal: https://cda.gov.ae/en/mediacenter/news/pages/2019/cda-license-violation.aspx

​Restoration is necessary to ensure the Google Knowledge Graph (which I officially manage as a verified owner) correctly reflects my institutional role rather than my historical medical background. Almuthanna (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikidata:Self-promotion & Wikidata:Notability WikiBayer (talk) 12:28, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

LumiMemoX item deletion - Request for Undeletion Q139801923 and/or Q139806511

Hi WikiBayer,

I am the owner of LumiMemoX, a premium photo restoration service based in Spain with its own website and social profiles. I created items Q139801923 and Q139806511, but they were deleted very quickly with the reason “Does not meet the notability policy; content was: ‘LumiMemoX (photo restoration service)’ and the only contributor was ‘Lumimemox’.”

My intention was to add full structured data (instance of online service, official website, country, industry, social profiles) with references to the official site and directory listings, not just leave a label.

Could you please advise what is the correct way to represent a small but real business like this in Wikidata? Would restoring one of the deleted items so I can complete the statements be acceptable, or should it be modeled in another way?

Thank you for your time and guidance. Lumimemox (talk) 14:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikidata is not a Promotionsplatform WikiBayer (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Restoration Request: Taat Affandy (Q139801298)

Hello @WikiBayer, I noticed that the item Taat Affandy (Q139801298) was recently deleted due to notability. I would like to respectfully request a restoration of this item.

Taat Affandy is an established, independent musical artist entity with official structural identifiers linked across globally recognized music databases. The item was populated with structured property links specifically to maintain database standards and prevent identity fragmentation across the semantic web.

Here are the authoritative external database IDs that validate this entity's notability under Wikidata's guidelines for musical artists:

• MusicBrainz Artist ID: 0d9f0b3b-e05b-4834-9a1c-3f154cdece8b
• Spotify Artist ID: 6rHMnGmOtFPR2uW6482PFQ
• Discogs Artist ID: 17588505
• Apple Music Artist ID: 1885623723

Could you please consider restoring the item so it can be properly maintained under official database properties? Thank you for your time and assistance. Taat Affandy (talk) 01:14, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Hallo

Ich hatte Q139893478 angelegt inkl aller verweise. und du hast es einfach gelöscht, mit einem Verweis, dass keine Belege da sind. Es gibt einen Sitelink auf Wikipedia, und alle anderen Verweise wie zB ZVR hast du ebenfalls gelöscht. Mit der Bitte um Klärung. Datawikianian (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

"keine Belege" schon mal die Seite dazu durchgelesen ZVR (ähnliches) ist nicht ausreichend. Aber ich habe jetzt gesehen das in einen Wikipedia Artikel der erwähnt wird, hate ich vorher übersehen. daher wieder hergestellt. WikiBayer (talk) 20:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

ja, ich habs gelesen. Danke fürs Wiederherstellen. Datawikianian (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Hallo WikiBayer

Ich habe heute Q139973866 angelegt jeweils mit Quellen und Verweisen und dabei nach meinem Verständnis mehrere Quellen und Verweise ergänzt, unter anderem auf öffentlich zugängliche Informationen des Unternehmen. Aus der Löschbegründung lese ich heraus, dass offenbar keine ausreichenden Belege oder auch keine ausreichende Relevanz vorhanden war.

Wo lag denn nun aus Deiner Sicht konkret das Problem? Bei der Relevanz des Unternehmens, bei der Art der Quellen oder bei der Tatsache, dass ich als Mitarbeiter der Cura den Eintrag angelegt habe? Denn ich dachte Transparenz ist wichtig?

Ich hatte mich dabei unter anderem am bestehenden Wikidata-Eintrag unserer Muttergesellschaft ARAG SE orientiert. Die sind hier auch erwähnt als Konzern und die sind doch relevant? Nur weil wir keine Wikipedia Eintrag haben sollte das nicht bedeuten, dass wir keinen Wikidata Eintrag haben dürfen oder? Mein Gedanke war, die Cura als Tochterunternehmen sachlich und nicht werblich mit Basisdaten wie Sitz, Rechtsform, Branche, Website, Handelsregisternummer und übergeordneter Organisation zu erfassen. Dann kann nämlich die ARAG uns als Tochter verlinken... Es ging ausdrücklich nicht um Werbung oder eine werbliche Unternehmensdarstellung. Zudem ist es ja so, dass man über einen solchen Dateneintrag KI-Systemen eine bessere Lesbarkeit ermöglicht. Auch das ist ja heutzutage wichtig, dass man "korrekt" und "sauber" eingeordnet werden kann.

Falls ein solcher Eintrag grundsätzlich möglich wäre, würde mich interessieren, welche unabhängigen Quellen oder Angaben dafür aus Deiner Sicht erforderlich wären :) Sollte der Interessenkonflikt durch meine Mitarbeit im Unternehmen ein Problem sein, wäre ich für einen Hinweis dankbar, wie man in einem solchen Fall korrekt vorgeht :) Phillip Kübber (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

"Verständnis mehrere Quellen und Verweise ergänzt" die Eigene Webseite ist keine reputable nicht selbsterstellte Quelle. WikiBayer (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Objection to deletion of Q139999810

Hello, my Q139999810 page was deleted due to notability. However, I am a professional digital content creator and media professional with verified brand collaborations (such as Temu, Amazon, Trendyol) and an official portfolio website (1emrecoskun.com.tr). My page establishes my unique identity to prevent name mix-ups on search engines. I kindly request the restoration of this item. Thank you. 1EmreCoskun (talk) 01:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Please read [2] WikiBayer (talk) 03:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

According to Criteria 1 listed here, an item is acceptable if it contains at least one valid sitelink to Wikimedia Commons. I have already uploaded and established a valid media file on Wikimedia Commons under the name 'File:Emre_Coskun_Portrait.png' which is directly associated with this item to serve as a general knowledge base entry. Therefore, it meets the requirement. Please kindly restore the page so the sitelink can be properly maintained. Thank you. 1EmreCoskun (talk) 09:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Q140032345

Hello WikiBayer, I’m sorry about your decision regarding this item:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140032345

I do indeed use the same username as the entry I proposed. I wanted to support my young media project transparently, rather than trying to work around the rules. I understand that this may have raised concerns, and I’m sorry if my approach was not appropriate. Have a good evening. Actualtplus (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Restoration request: I See Ghøsts (Q140052722)

Hello WikiBayer,

I noticed you deleted item Q140052722 (I See Ghøsts) as spam/advertising. I understand the concern — the entry was created by the band's own account and lacked statements and references at the time of deletion.

I See Ghøsts is a German Post-Hardcore / Alternative Rock band from Heilbronn with substantial independent press coverage that establishes notability:

- Get Some Magazine (EP review, author: James Alvarez): https://getsomemagazine.com/blog/album-review-i-see-ghosts-goddamn-fine - Melodic Magazine (single review, author: Britt Mae): https://www.melodicmag.com/news/i-see-ghosts-find-some-peace-in-new-single/ - Alt77 (EP review, author: Eduard Banulescu): https://alt77.com/i-see-ghosts-goddamn-fine-reviewed/ - Return of Rock (single news): https://returnofrock.com/i-see-ghosts-deliver-new-single-down-here-ahead-of-2025-ep-release/ - MusicBrainz entry: https://musicbrainz.org/artist/6a9d80fb-4eb7-413a-9a63-457e68df1752

Would you be willing to restore the item so it can be properly completed with statements and references to these sources? Alternatively, I would appreciate your advice on the correct process.

Thank you for your time. Iseeghostsmusic (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

See WD:Notability (reputable Source is needed) + WD:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Q140052078 deletion — Gemini-Stiftung

Hi, you deleted item Q140052078 (Gemini-Stiftung) today as non-notable. I created it with the intention to build it out once autoconfirmed status would allow statements.

The foundation is officially recognized by Landesdirektion Sachsen since 21 December 2023 (recognition certificate available), has published research (Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20396192), and has an active ROR application (issue #34332 in ror-community/ror-updates).

Could you advise on how to make a notability case correctly, or what minimum content the item should have at creation time to meet the policy? Flash3333 (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

See WD:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Element Recovery

3 Dear Wikidata administrator [User:WikiBayer]] would like to ask you to restore the page element Q139583972 (VOOLAND) all possible music databases and streaming indicators were attached to the element including Spotify, Yandex music, databases such as kkbox and MusicBrainz. Likewikiass (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Pleas read WD:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Question about deletion of Egregor / Sovereign ecosystem items

Hello WikiBayer,

You recently deleted several items I created (Egregor, SovereignBank Web3, SovereignWeb3 Browser, Sovereign) under the notability policy. I fully respect your decision and I'm not here to argue — I'd genuinely like to understand the requirements so I can do this correctly.

A few honest questions:

1. For software items, which kinds of sources count as establishing notability

  here? I had referenced the project repositories, an independent article, and 
  several technical publications, but I understand these may not have been enough.

2. The items were still a work in progress — I had not yet added all available

  references (independent technical articles on Dev.to, Hashnode, Medium, 
  HackerNoon, plus directory listings on SourceForge and SaaSHub). Would adding 
  these as references change the assessment?

3. Is there a recommended path — for example, waiting until coverage in

  recognized media exists — before re-creating such items?

I want to follow the rules properly rather than work against them. Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.

Vladislav Shter Vladislav Shter (talk) 08:15, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

You need reputable not self creatde sources WikiBayer (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Question regarding deletion of Amulet (Washington, DC electro-industrial band)

Hi! I noticed that the Wikidata item I created for Amulet (Washington, DC-based electro-industrial band founded in 2020) was deleted under the notability policy. I was hoping to better understand the reasoning.

The band currently has MusicBrainz and Discogs catalogs, Spotify and Apple Music artist pages, an official website, releases dating back to 2021, a growing catalog, and a social following. I was under the impression that these external identifiers might satisfy Wikidata notability, so I wanted to ask whether there was another issue with the item or whether additional sources or identifiers would be needed.

Thank you for your time and guidance! Amulettheband (talk) 20:19, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 14:32, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request: Q140184727 (Avenir Tour & Travel)

Hello WikiBayer, you deleted Q140184727 (Avenir Tour & Travel) earlier today citing notability — the item only referenced the company's own website, which is a fair point. I am affiliated with the company (disclosed). I would like to politely request undeletion, because the entity is described by serious, independent Indonesian media publications:

1. Liputan6.com (KLY Group), April 2023 — https://www.liputan6.com/surabaya/read/5253675/jasa-travel-ini-tawarkan-wisata-luar-negeri-mudah-dan-aman-dengan-harga-terjangkau-tertarik
2. Fimela.com, November 2023 — https://www.fimela.com/lifestyle/read/5456363/liburan-akhir-tahun-semakin-dekat-avenir-tour-amp-travel-hadirkan-pengalaman-liburan-berkualitas
3. Media Indonesia — https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/630201/tren-perjalanan-meningkat-avenir-tour-travel-siapkan-fasilitas-premiun-untuk-keluarga

Per Wikidata:Notability criterion 2 this seems to qualify as a clearly identifiable entity described by serious, publicly available references. If restored, I will add these independent sources as references on the main statements. I could not post at Wikidata:Requests for undeletion because my account is not yet autoconfirmed. Thank you for considering. Avenirtour (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

A reputable not self create source is needed. WikiBayer (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Q140229565 (Jonas Cleveland) — notability question

Hi WikiBayer, You deleted Q140229565 (Jonas Cleveland) today under the notability policy. It was a self-created item and I disclosed the COI on my user page. I understand, and I will not recreate it. I want to do this correctly. The subject also has a research record: peer-reviewed publications in robotics and machine perception (UPenn GRASP Laboratory), several U.S. patents, and an ORCID/Google Scholar profile: [link]. Two questions: Does a research-based item (sourced from ORCID/Scholar) meet the notability criteria better than the press-based one? For a subject with a COI, is the best route to ask at Project chat for an uninvolved editor to create it? Thank you for your help. Jonas cleveland (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Plesse read Wikidata:Self-promotion & WD: WikiBayer (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Danke

Danke, dass du bei den PR-Versuchen von Pavel und Olaf so aufmerksam und konsequent bleibst! ~2026-36086-77 (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Antrag auf Wiederherstellung des Datenobjekts Q140309381 (Lutz Röhrig)

ich möchte dich höflich um die Wiederherstellung des gelöschten Objekts Q140309381 (Lutz Röhrig) bitten. Die Löschung erfolgte mit der Begründung, dass die Relevanzkriterien nicht erfüllt seien. Ich bin jedoch davon überzeugt, dass das Objekt die lockeren Relevanzkriterien von Wikidata (strukturelle und bibliografische Relevanz) aufgrund folgender nachprüfbarer Fakten erfüllt: Publikationstätigkeit in Fachmedien: Ich bin regelmäßiger Autor von historisch-wissenschaftlichen Fachaufsätzen in den Berliner Verkehrsblättern (Wikidata-Objekt: Q821844). Die Autorenschaft lässt sich über Wikidata-Eigenschaften direkt mit diesem bestehenden Objekt verknüpfen. Fachquelle in der Wikipedia: Meine historischen Forschungen und Veröffentlichungen werden in großen, hochfrequentierten deutschsprachigen Wikipedia-Artikeln als verifizierte Einzelnachweise genutzt, so zum Beispiel im Artikel de:Bruno Taut (Einzelnachweis Nr. 8) Zeit-fuer-berlin (talk) 20:14, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Na, is a bisserl knapp das Feld da oben

Fachquelle in der Wikipedia: Meine historischen Forschungen und Veröffentlichungen werden in großen, hochfrequentierten deutschsprachigen Wikipedia-Artikeln als verifizierte Einzelnachweise genutzt, so zum Beispiel im Artikel de:Bruno Taut (Einzelnachweis Nr. 8) sowie im Artikel de:Berlin Anhalter Bahnhof. Institutionelle und mediale Relevanz: Meine historischen Dokumentationen werden von kommunalen Planungsämtern (z. B. Gemeindeplanungsamt Blankenfelde-Mahlow, dokumentiert im Ratsinfoservice unter Datei 66292) als offizielle fachliche Grundlage für Planungsverfahren herangezogen. Zudem trete ich als Zeithistoriker in Dokumentationen des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks auf (rbb, Q168582). Es ist korrekt, dass ich das Objekt als Betroffener selbst angelegt habe. Dennoch besitze ich im semantischen Gefüge der Berliner Regionalgeschichte eine eigenständige, nachweisbare Relevanz. Ein Datenobjekt ist auf Wikidata (wo die Hürden bekanntlich niedriger sind als bei Wikipedia-Artikeln) vollkommen gerechtfertigt, um die Verknüpfungen zu meinen Publikationen (ORCID, Q821844) und den Wikipedia-Zitaten sauber abzubilden. Zeit-fuer-berlin (talk) 20:17, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Ansonsten: Freundliche Grüße nach Bayern. Ich als Preuße durfte mich da auch mal 5 Jahre aufhalten. War gar nicht so schlecht. Aber dann gab es plötzlich meinen Arbeitgeber nicht mehr. Lutz Röhrig, www.zeit-fuer-berlin.de Zeit-fuer-berlin (talk) 20:19, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Ich habe es mir es angeschaut auch wenn weikidata nicht so Streng ist. Die verlinkung deiner Webseite in einen Artikel reicht nicht aus. Auch rbb oder die Verlagsblätter reichen nicht aus außer du hast hier eine Besondere Stellung die dich hier nenneswert macht. Eine [3] nach deinen bringt auch keine Ergebnisse.--WikiBayer (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung - ist ja nicht immer selbstverständlich. Schreibe gerade mit einem Auge auf den Monitor und mit dem anderen zum Fernseher (die deutsche Mannschaft spielt gerade) die Antwort an Dich. Im Berliner Raum haben große Tageszeitungen wie der "Tagesspiegel oder die "Märkische Allgemeine" mich interviewt im Hinblick auf meine Biographie und meinem zeithistorisch intendierten, ehrenamtlichen Projekt "Zeit für Berlin" (Quellen und Verlinkungen zu den Originalen siehe "über ZFB > ZFB in der Presse". Es kann alles belegt werden). Die Qualität meiner Berichte führte zudem dazu, dasdes Öfteren Fachzeitschriften meine Artikel übernommen haben. Die größte zeithistorische APP der Stadt, die von einem Historiker geführte "BerlinHistory App", hat mich zur Kooperation eingeladen und meine Kinoartikel übernommen. Wikipedia - hier dienen meine aufwendigen Artikel auch als Quelle, siehe "Berlin Anhalter Bahnhof", "Bruno Taut", siehe auch den Pressebereich. Ich bin Gründungsmitglied im "KulturerbeNetz.Berlin" und dort auch aktiv. Vor meiner Kamera standen Größen wie Patti Smith, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing oder Gisela Getty. Ich bin zum Podcast des Golem-Internetmagazins eingeladen worden (siehe Pressebereich und der Verlinkung) und vom RRB als Experte. Alles Belegt im Pressebereich (und war es auch auf Wikidata).Ich veröffentliche auf Researchgate und Zenodo, in den Schriften des "Vereins für die Geschichte berlins, gegr. 1865 e. V. und für die berliner Verkhrsblätter. Vielleicht schaust Du nochmal drüber bzw. kann ich Dir noch weitere Fragen beantworten. Ach herje, jetzt steht es 1:1. Aber egal wie das Fußballspiel ausgeht- weiter kommen wir ja in jedem Fall. Lutz Röhrig, Zeit-fuer-berlin.de Zeit-fuer-berlin (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request: Plus8Soft (Q140330079)

Hi WikiBayer,

You deleted Q140330079 (Plus8Soft) as not meeting the notability policy - understood, and thanks for keeping the project's standards high. Before I consider anything further, I'd value your guidance.

Since the deletion I can point to two independent sources I don't think were fully reflected in the item:

- Recognition in IAOP's The Global Outsourcing 100 (2026), Rising Star category (independent industry ranking): https://www.iaop.org/Content/19/165/5912 - Official state registration with the Texas Comptroller (legal name Axiomasoft LLC): https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/franchise/account-status/search/321033800047

In your view, would references like these be enough to meet criterion 2 (a clearly identifiable entity describable with serious, publicly available sources)? If yes, I'd appreciate undeletion or your go-ahead to recreate with them in place. If not, I'd rather not recreate it. Could you tell me pls what kind of source would actually clear the bar?

Thanks very much. Plus8Soft (talk) 12:24, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

A reputable source is needed Plesse read WD: Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Igor Dimitrijević (Q140356947), a request for reconsideration

Hello, WikiBayer,

I am writing to you regarding the deletion of Q140356947 (Igor Dimitrijević) and I would like to raise a couple of points for reconsideration.

First, a factual note, the deletion log states that the only contributor to the item was me, but the item also received an independent and a 3rd-party edit (a Bangla label) from an established editor (@MS Sakib).

Second, regarding the notability issue and the distinctiveness of the item, the item was a target of a different from (P1889) statement disambiguating me from an unrelated footballer of the same name (Q15964690). It was referenced via educated at (P69) from two institutions: a newly created item for my secondary school (Q140365596), sourced to an official institutional graduation record, and the Faculty of Technical Sciences in Čačak, sourced to an official faculty graduation list (PDF, hosted on the faculty's own domain and using the reserved second-level domain).

Beyond that, independent third-party references exist outside my own properties or website, including:

- a GitHub Action of mine being manually incorporated into GitHub's own CodeQL taint-analysis model.

- AdVoid's filter lists being adopted by the independent 1Hosts blocklist project.

- a PR, contributed to one of my open-source components (PostExcerpt) by Birk Skyum, a co-founder of MapLibre (used and supported by Amazon, Meta and Microsoft among others).

- a Google Knowledge Panel that appears for my name, independently compiled by Google and includes my image(s), an excerpt, and social accounts.

- my Astro PostExcerpt component being referenced as an existing solution in an independent blog post by Chen Hui Jing ("Creating excerpts in Astro").

These references are all verifiable, public, and were cited on my item.

I believe this satisfies the structural-necessity criterion under Wikidata:Notability since the item is/was actively referenced by other items for disambiguation and educational linkage, independent of any claims about my personal/professional notability. Additionally, the independent sources listed above demonstrate real-world recognition beyond self-promotion, for which this platform should not be used.

Could you let me know specifically which notability criterion you believe still is not met, given the above? I would like to address it directly.

Thank you for your time, Igor. Igorskyflyer (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Please read WD:N & Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

@Igorskyflyer Just a small clarification: the Bangla description was added automatically while I was running a script, rather than as a manual, independent contribution. Therefore, I don't think my edit should be considered in this context or cited as evidence of independent third-party involvement. MS Sakib (talk) 16:05, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying, @MS Sakib!

WikiBayer, I have reviewed WD:N and the Self-promotion page. Regarding Wikidata:Self-promotion, my understanding is that page is tagged as an essay, not an adopted policy or guideline, unlike WD:N which is officially recognized as such.

Could you clarify whether you are applying it as binding criteria here, and if so, under what consensus? I want to make sure I am responding to the actual applicable policy rather than guidance that may not carry the same weight and is subjective. Igorskyflyer (talk) 16:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

you need reputable not selfcreated sources WikiBayer (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your time,

I did list several non-self-created, independent sources in my first comment, could you let me know specifically which of these you don't consider reputable, and why:

- GitHub's own CodeQL taint-analysis model manually incorporating one of my Actions

- The independent 1Hosts blocklist project adopting AdVoid's filter lists

- My Astro PostExcerpt component is used to generate excerpts on MapLibre's (a highly notable and widely used open-source mapping framework) own blog, with a PR contributed by Birk Skyum, MapLibre's co-founder (source 1, source 2)

- Rolldown's own CI workflow using my action-readfile GitHub Action (source)

- An independent blog post by Chen Hui Jing referencing my PostExcerpt component

None of these are hosted on my own website or social media I control, they are third-party platforms/organizations/individuals referencing my work independently. I would like to understand specifically why these do not meet the bar, rather than the general criteria again. Also, the education-related references (gymnasium and faculty graduation records) are hosted on the institutions' own official and reserved domains, independent of me.

To clarify: of these, the GitHub CodeQL inclusion (and Rolldown) were cited as references directly on the item. The others: 1Hosts' adoption of AdVoid's filter lists, the Birk Skyum PR, and Chen Hui Jing's blog post are independent, verifiable facts I'm raising now as additional evidence of real-world recognition, separate from what was originally referenced on the item. For that reason, I have not included in this list the Google Knowledge Panel I have been given, as I understand it is explicitly excluded as a notability basis under current guidance.

Worth noting: several of these are code-level/repository-level dependencies (CodeQL, Rolldown, 1Hosts, etc.) rather than editorial coverage, meaning someone made a deliberate technical decision to depend on or incorporate my work, rather than just mentioning it. Chen Hui Jing's post is the one closer to traditional editorial coverage.

I would appreciate a direct response to the specific sources above, thank you, Igor. Igorskyflyer (talk) 17:31, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

None of the cited sources meets this criterion. WikiBayer (talk) 04:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Q140366815 deleted

Hello.

I believe this item may have been deleted as promotional content.

The subject has an official website and independent media coverage, including articles published by third-party outlets.

Could you please clarify what notability requirements are missing so I can improve the submission?

Thank you. Avapdp (talk) 02:37, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

you need reputable not self created sources WikiBayer (talk) 04:54, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Request help with Q116868242

Hi WikiBayer,

I'm Erik Kraemer, the subject of Q116868242. I have declared my conflict of interest on my user page: User:ErikKraemerOfficial

On 29 June 2026 I made edits as IP ~2026-37277-24. You removed several claims that used described by source: Q140375488, Q140375638, and Q140375535 as references. I now understand that these were invalid circular references to Wikidata items, not proper external sources. I sincerely apologize for this mistake. I am new to Wikidata and I misunderstood the reference requirements.

I want to fix the item properly. Could you please advise: 1. Can the claims you removed be restored if I add valid URL references from reliable sources? 2. What type of sources are acceptable for statements like date of birth, band membership, and social media IDs?

I have these sources ready to use:- KaaosZine interview for date of birth and biography- Frontiers Records official artist pages for band memberships- Spotify, Instagram, and other platforms for their respective IDs

I will not make any further edits to Q116868242 until I receive guidance from you. I want to follow all Wikidata policies correctly. Thank you for your time and for maintaining Wikidata's quality standards.

Best regards,Erik Kraemer ErikKraemerOfficial (talk) 11:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Please read WP:N & Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Q140377908 deleted

I added this company because I became aware of it through my stock market research. I found it interesting and I would like to add it here to complete the list of publicly traded companies but I did something wrong. What do I have to consider? ~2026-28218-05 (talk) 11:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Q138527696 (ABCspecialist) - notability question

Hello WikiBayer,

I noticed you deleted the item Q138527696 (ABCspecialist) for not meeting the notability policy. I'd like to understand what would be needed to recreate this item correctly.

ABCspecialist Automotive B.V. is a registered Dutch company (KVK 85025380), founded in 2010, specializing in remanufacturing hydraulic and air suspension components for premium vehicles.

Could you clarify what type of independent sources (e.g. trade press, third-party mentions) would be required to satisfy the notability policy for a company item like this?

Thank you for your time. ABCspecialist (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Q140421871 — request for guidance

Hello WikiBayer, you deleted Q140421871 (Beverly Hills Lux Ride) earlier today. I created it, and my affiliation with the company is disclosed on my user page — so I understand the skepticism toward a new account creating an item about its own company, and I will not recreate it out of process.

May I ask for your guidance? The item's structural statements were referenced to the California Public Utilities Commission's public carrier registry (charter-party carrier authority PSG0040987, status Active), which I had understood as a "serious and publicly available reference" to a clearly identifiable entity in the sense of Wikidata:Notability criterion 2. If a state regulator's registry is not sufficient on its own, could you tell me what you would consider sufficient for a company item — e.g. independent press coverage? If such sources exist or emerge, would you be open to restoration via Wikidata:Requests for undeletion? I would rather return with proper evidence than do anything against policy. Thank you for your time. Beverlyhillsluxride (talk) 19:38, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

See Wikidata:What Wikidata is not, Wikidata:Self-promotion. Wikidata is not a Company database. All items need a repatable not self created soruce. WikiBayer (talk) 19:41, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Q140428982 (tekRESCUE)

Hello, I am requesting undeletion of Q140428982 (tekRESCUE), deleted on 4 July 2026 for not meeting the notability policy. The deletion was fair since the item was created without references. I would like to restore it and properly source it.

I am Randy Bryan, founder of tekRESCUE, and I have disclosed this conflict of interest on my user page. Independent sources describing the entity: San Marcos Daily Record (independent local newspaper, publishing since 1912), news article covering a San Marcos Area Chamber of Commerce event featuring tekRESCUE's CEO, February 2026: https://web.archive.org/web/20260204140739/https://www.sanmarcosrecord.com/article/32617,tekrescue-ceo-shares-new-ai-strategies-for-business-success

San Marcos Daily Record, news article on the Chamber of Commerce board election naming Randy Bryan of tekRESCUE as an elected director, October 2024: https://web.archive.org/web/20241004120849/https://www.sanmarcosrecord.com/article/28013,new-chamber-board-elected

Apple Podcasts directory listing for Security Squawk, a cybersecurity podcast co-hosted by tekRESCUE's founder: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/security-squawk-the-business-of-cybersecurity/id1544342775

Spotify directory listing for the same program: https://open.spotify.com/show/5VdWXq9DwYVBn8bOVgumyg

The company has operated since 2010 in San Marcos, Texas. If the item is restored, I will add these as references on the statements and keep the description neutral. I am also happy to recreate the item with references attached from the start if that is preferred. Thank you for your time.

Texasaggie1 (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

you need reputable not self created sources WikiBayer (talk) 17:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

the two from the San Marcos daily record are reputable and not self created, no? Texasaggie1 (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

The San Marcos Daily Record is an independent daily newspaper (published since 1912, owned by Moser Community Media) and both articles were written by their news staff, not by me or tekRESCUE. The newspaper is currently migrating its website, so I posted waybackmachine links. Texasaggie1 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Personen-Item zu einer MedReg-registrierten Chiropraktorin (Kontext: Q140437757)

Hallo WikiBayer

Du hast heute Q140437757 (Chiropraktik Löwenplatz) gelöscht — nachvollziehbar: Ich war versehentlich nicht eingeloggt, und das Item stand unfertig ohne Aussagen und unabhängige Belege da. Mein Auftragsverhältnis ist inzwischen auf meiner Benutzerseite offengelegt.

Bevor ich etwas Neues anlege, möchte ich kurz rückfragen:

1. Ich würde gern ein Personen-Item zu Dr. Ewa Hug erstellen —

  Chiropraktorin mit kantonaler Berufsausübungsbewilligung, verzeichnet
  im Medizinalberuferegister des BAG (MedReg, GLN 7601003009736,
  https://www.healthreg-public.admin.ch/medreg/search) sowie im
  Mitgliederverzeichnis von ChiroSuisse. Die GLN würde ich als P9860
  erfassen; die Aussagen stützen sich auf das amtliche Register,
  nicht auf die Praxis-Website. Spricht aus deiner Sicht etwas
  gegen die Anlage?

2. Wäre ergänzend ein schlankes Item zur Praxis selbst zulässig

  (P31: Q718966, dieselben Belege) — oder rätst du davon ab?
  Dann lasse ich es bleiben.

Danke für eine kurze Einschätzung und Gruss --Limmatfeder (talk) 10:02, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@Limmatfeder Wikidata ist keien Unternehmensdatenbank. Du brauchst reputable nicht Selbst erstellte Quellen. Amtliche Register alleine sind nicht ausreichend. Siehe What Wikidata is not und Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 11:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Request to restore Q140437601 (monTransport.com)

Hello WikiBayer, thank you for reviewing and deleting Q140437601 (monTransport.com). I contribute to monTransport.com and I'm trying to create an accurate, well-sourced Wikidata item that complies with Wikidata's policies. I have since gathered stronger, authoritative sources, including the official French Government Business Register (SIREN): https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/entreprise/811699933. I can also provide the company's official website (https://montransport.com/), Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Crunchbase profile if they are helpful. Could you please advise what additional sources or identifiers would be required for the item to meet Wikidata's notability requirements, and what would be the best way to restore the deleted item? I would greatly appreciate your guidance. Thank you. Montransportcom (talk) 11:01, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Please read Wikidata:What Wikidata is not & Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 11:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello WikiBayer, Thank you for the links. I've read the policies and understand your concerns regarding self-promotion and notability. My intention is not to use Wikidata for promotion but to ensure accurate, verifiable information if the company qualifies. Could you please clarify whether the issue is solely the lack of demonstrated notability, or whether there is another policy concern? If independent editors believe the company meets the criteria in the future, would a new item be acceptable? Montransportcom (talk) 03:59, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Request to restore Q140133847 (WeCare Hosting)

Hello WikiBayer, I am writing to respectfully request the restoration of the item Q140133847 for WeCare Hosting, which was recently deleted.

I understand the community works hard to keep Wikidata clean and free of spam or self-promotion, and I completely support those efforts. I believe the item was flagged because I accidentally added an incorrect LinkedIn URL when I created it. I recognize how this mistake could make the entry look like an unverified or promotional edit, but it was a genuine copy-paste error.

My only goal is to contribute accurate, verifiable data to the knowledge base. There is no intent of self-promotion. To verify the entity and its correct data, please feel free to check the company's other official profiles and website, which align perfectly with the correct LinkedIn page:

Correct LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/company/wecare-hosting

Official Website: https://wecarehosting.com.br

Instagram: https://instagram.com/wecarehosting

I appeal to the community's shared mission of maintaining accurate linked open data. If the item can be restored, I will immediately update the LinkedIn statement with the correct URL (or an administrator is welcome to apply the correct link upon restoration).

Thank you for your time, volunteer work, and understanding.

Best regards,

Carlos Pecucci (WeCare Hosting Founder) Carlospecucci (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Please read Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Question about deletion of Q139913702

Hi, you recently deleted Q139913702 (AnimeOshi) as spam/advertising. I've disclosed a conflict of interest on my user page and was trying to follow notability and sourcing norms, so I'd genuinely like to understand what made it read as promotional so I can avoid repeating the mistake.

For context, AnimeOshi has independent editorial coverage in the animation trade press, including:

• Cartoon Brew (covers the platform's role in fan-driven anime development)
• Anime Corner (interview discussing the platform and its parent studio)
• Animation Journal

Would coverage like this support a compliant item, or is the subject simply not notable enough yet by Wikidata's standards? I'd rather build it correctly than resubmit something that gets removed again. Thanks for your time. MasonKasagiLabo (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

you need a reputable source no source is reputable WikiBayer (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request for Maria Botta Q140479834

Request for reinstatement of Maria Botta Q140479834 Mariabotta (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, my item Q140479834 (Maria Botta) was deleted for notability. I'd like to request it be restored or reviewed, since it's supported by several independent sources: Thrive Global interview - https://medium.com/thrive-global/dont-fret-about-your-company-name-your-values-and-mission-are-much-more-important-with-maria-66bb0dd434cc Authority Magazine profile - https://medium.com/authority-magazine/women-of-the-c-suite-marria-botta-of-fwd-action-on-the-five-things-you-need-to-succeed-as-a-senior-eaa0d9db8104 A public mentor bio hosted on Founder Institute's own site (fi.co) An author archive on Latin Business Today - https://latinbusinesstoday.com/author/maria-botta/ Appearances on independent podcasts: Response Drivers - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/why-clarity-and-customer-insight-drive-scalable/id1807776199?i=1000710973944 Fractional CMOs & The 90-Day Win Jun 13, 2025 Episode - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/gwynne-fane-and-maria-botta/id1749787985?i=1000712798502 August 3, 2024 Episode - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/stacey-danheiser-and-maria-botta/id1749787985?i=1000664193748 NU Voices - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/maria-the-creator-economys-nomad/id1675994348?i=1000658731222

I understand the concern about single-contributor items and am happy to have someone else verify or expand it if that helps. Thank you for considering.

A not self created reputable Source is needed. no Source is reputable.--WikiBayer (talk) 16:46, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Please see that notability is supported by several independent sources that are not self created. The sourcing meets the independence requirement.

1. Latin Business Today's author archive reflects an ongoing editorial relationship with an outlet that is not affiliated with me https://latinbusinesstoday.com/author/maria-botta/

2. 5 appearances on podcasts hosted by independent hosts who selected me as a guest. The booking decision and resulting content were theirs, not mine.:

Response Drivers - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/why-clarity-and-customer-insight-drive-scalable/id1807776199?i=1000710973944

Fractional CMOs & The 90-Day Win

Jun 13, 2025 Episode - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/gwynne-fane-and-maria-botta/id1749787985?i=1000712798502

August 3, 2024 Episode - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/stacey-danheiser-and-maria-botta/id1749787985?i=1000664193748

NU Voices - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/maria-the-creator-economys-nomad/id1675994348?i=1000658731222

Coffee with a T-bird hosted by Alex Rozenfeld

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/from-executive-tv-producer-to-startup-advisor-the/id1824273298?i=1000730345795 Mariabotta (talk) 09:55, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

No Source is reputable WikiBayer (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Bitte um zweite Prüfung: Q140520821 (Florian Keusch)

Hallo WikiBayer, du hast heute Q140520821 (Florian Keusch, Wien) gemeinsam mit zwei weiteren Items aus meinem Account gelöscht. Bei der Firma (Q140520824) und dem Buch akzeptiere ich deine Einschätzung. Beim Personen-Item bitte ich dich um eine zweite Prüfung; die Belege waren als Referenzen gesetzt:

• eigener individualisierter GND-Normdatensatz 1249151236 (https://lobid.org/gnd/1249151236), getrennt vom Namensvetter Prof. Florian Keusch, Universität Mannheim (Q88170116, GND 1197838805)
• Sachbuch mit ISBN 978-3-200-08101-7, im DNB-Katalog geführt (IDN 1247643247)
• überregionale Berichterstattung über seine Kampagnen als Sprecher und Marketingleiter der Bestattung Wien: DER STANDARD (Story 2000120971338), horizont.at (Artikel 72099), dazu ein Objekt in der Sammlung des Wien Museums (Inventarnummer M 24008)

Nach Wikidata:Notability Kriterium 2 (serious and publicly available references) und wegen der laufenden Verwechslung mit dem Mannheimer Professor (das Item trug P1889 zur Abgrenzung; die GND trennt beide Personen bereits) halte ich den Datensatz für tragfähig. Interessenkonflikt lege ich offen: Ich bin die beschriebene Person, das Item wurde über meinen Account angelegt. Wenn dir einzelne Aussagen zu weit gehen, kürze gern; mir geht es um den Normdaten-Knoten. Danke fürs Draufschauen. Spectator1234567 (talk) 12:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Dei nennung in einen Datensatz alleine ist nicht ausreichend. DER STANDARD nennt noch nicht mal seinen namen im Artikel und es geht gar nicht über den Florian Keusch, sondern über einen Werbegag. Eine lokale ausstellung eines Werbgags ist definitv auch nicht als reputable Quelle zu sehen, zumal es auch hier nicht wirklich um die Person selbst geht. WikiBayer (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Deine Einwände zu STANDARD und Wien-Museum-Objekt nehme ich an, die betreffen die Kampagnen, nicht die Person, die lasse ich fallen. Ich stütze mich nur noch auf zwei personenbezogene, überprüfbare Belege:

• Individualisierter GND-Datensatz 1249151236 (Tp, differenzierte Person). Wikidata:Notability Kriterium 2 verlangt eine „serious and publicly available reference", nicht eine Wikipedia-taugliche Signifikanz-Berichterstattung; ein individualisierter Normdatensatz ist eine solche Referenz. Er trennt die Person zudem eindeutig vom Namensvetter Q88170116 (Prof., GND 1197838805), mit dem sie laufend verwechselt wird, worin ich auch einen strukturellen Nutzen sehe (Kriterium 3).
• Buch als Herausgeber und Co-Autor, ISBN 978-3-200-08101-7, im Katalog der Wienbibliothek im Rathaus nachgewiesen (AC16410501). Ein identifizierbares, öffentlich nachgewiesenes Werk der Person selbst.

Zur Transparenz: Ich habe nach der Löschung eine belegtere Fassung unter Q140521006 angelegt (GND und VIAF als Anker, verknüpft mit Q17122456 und Q830428, Buch als P800). Den Interessenkonflikt lege ich weiter offen, ich bin die Person. Falls du auch das für nicht ausreichend hältst, akzeptiere ich deine Entscheidung und du kannst es löschen; ich gehe nicht in die Wiederherstellungs-Instanz. Danke fürs nochmalige Draufschauen. Spectator1234567 (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request for Q116929599, Q119710760

Hi, I noticed you've overcorrected slightly when deleting a series of OpenStreetMap-related items on the basis of Wikidata:Notability. Please note that the current notability policy only requires that an item meets one of the criteria. Only criterion 2 requires a "serious and publicly available reference". This policy itself does not require an independently published source in all cases, though I understand that some editors here may be accustomed to applying such a standard from Wikipedia.

I request that you restore the following two items:

• Matthew Whilden (Q116929599)
  • Meets criterion 3, used in OpenStreetMap U.S. (Q61847315)chairperson (P488).
    • Source: stated in (P248)GuideStar.org (Q5615419)reference URL (P854)https://www.guidestar.org/profile/shared/2c17668a-ad97-4c4d-8b4a-ae89a72916f0
    • Source: stated in (P248)Nonprofit Explorer (Q98384384)reference URL (P854)https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/272375394
• Q119710760
  • Meets criterion 1, used in M133070272author (P50). In the future, you can avoid this problem by searching Commons for the QID. After the fact, you can also consult Wikidata:Database reports/Deleted Wikidata entities used in SDC.
  • Meets criterion 3, will be used in OpenStreetMap Americana (Q110609728)developer (P178)
    • Source: reference URL (P854)https://openstreetmap.us/our-work/community-projects/americana/

I've provided some sources for the individual claims that I'm unable to add at the moment due to the deletions. If you have any concerns about these items apart from the notability policy, I'd be happy to address them once they're restored. Thank you for looking into it.

 – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 21:08, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Löschung von Q140183597

Hallo WikiBayer,

du hast Q140183597 gelöscht bevor ich darauf reagieren konnte. Um was handelte es sich und welche Aussagen und Identifikatoren waren angegeben? Granpar (talk) 06:04, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Eine reputable nicht selbst erstellte Quelle, dies wirst du aber mit Sicherheit hier nicht haben. WikiBayer (talk) 18:18, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

@WikiBayer: Mich interssiert trotzdem, um was es sich bei Q140183597 handelte. Granpar (talk) 05:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

@WikiBayer: Erinnerung Granpar (talk) 07:55, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Item über eine Werbeagentur. WikiBayer (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Bitte beantworte doch endlich die ursprüngliche Frage Granpar (talk) 14:49, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Quellen Waren nur selbst erstellt nicht reputable z.b. Indeed Profil. eology GmbH Arbeitsgebiet (P101): Suchmaschinenmarketing (Q846132)) WikiBayer (talk) 06:18, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Request to restore Q140329739 (Orbitvu)

Hello WikiBayer,

You deleted the item Q140329739 (Orbitvu) on 8 July 2026 as not meeting the notability policy, with the noted content being just "Orbitvu". I believe the item was caught at a very early stage while I was still building it — at the point of deletion it only had a label, but I subsequently intended to add full statements.

Orbitvu is a Polish company active in product photography automation (hardware and software). I believe it meets Wikidata notability under WD:N as a clearly identifiable entity described by serious, publicly available references, including:

• Official website: https://orbitvu.com
• LinkedIn company page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orbitvu-ltd
• YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKgOImVbNl-XitO0sP4qfVA
• Independent press coverage, e.g. Forbes.pl and industry media (fotopolis.pl, canon.pl). Polish KRS

Could you please restore the item so I can complete it with these statements and references? If you'd prefer, I'm happy to rebuild it with the identifiers and sources in place from the start.

Thank you for your time and for the work you do maintaining Wikidata.

~2026-38825-59 (talk) 07:02, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

@WikiBayer Can I please ask for a reply? ~2026-38825-59 (talk) 11:40, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

See Wikidata:Notability WikiBayer (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Restore request ABRTorgau

Hello WikiBayer. I am a legitimate account editor affected by block ID #78253 on range 2001:8003:0:0:0:0:0:0/32. This block is not targeted at me personally. My editing history on Q139738195, Q139781232 and Q140126685 demonstrates good faith editing over an extended period. I am requesting an IP block exemption to allow continued editing while logged in. Thank you. ABRTorgau (talk) 13:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion review: Q140563598 (Daniele Orlandi - Brand/Business entity)

Hello WikiBayer.

I would like to respectfully request a review and undeletion of item Q140563598, which was deleted for not meeting the notability policy. While I was the sole contributor to the page, the item was not an empty entry. I had already transferred and created a highly structured set of statements supported by objective, verifiable, and authoritative data sources. The item included detailed references to: The official Italian Business Register, Valid EU VAT registration numbers, Public institutional profiles (such as the Italian Trade Agency) Independent media articles and official URLs, directories of excellence and trademark certification.

The creation of this page was part of a data-splitting process following Wikidata best practices. The existing item, Q140010516, currently models Daniele Orlandi as both a human (fashion designer) and a business entity simultaneously. To resolve this modeling error, Q140563598 was created to cleanly house the brand/business data, and I was mid-process when it was deleted.

Because the page contained robust, verifiable data satisfying the Wikidata Notability Criteria, could you please restore Q140563598? This will allow me to finalize the cleanup and properly unlink the corporate attributes from the personal item.

Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

Best regards, Daniele Orlandi Daniele Orlandi Como (talk) 10:29, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Please read Wikidata:Wikidata is not & Wikidata:Self-promotion WikiBayer (talk) 12:18, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Request to review today's mass deletion of my items

Hello WikiBayer, I'm writing about the mass deletion of the pages created by my account earlier today. I want to start by saying I understand how it looked, a new account creating several items connected to himself, and I should have disclosed my conflict of interest before creating anything rather than after. I've now added that disclosure to my user page.

For context on why I created these items in the first place: there is another Brandon Metcalf with an existing item (Q4956978), a Nashville record producer with a Wikipedia article. Because no item exists for me, search engines and knowledge graphs regularly conflate the two of us, attributing his career to me and vice versa. My goal was disambiguation between two distinct people, though I understand the way I went about it looked like promotion.

All of the deleted items carried references, and the two company items have independent editorial coverage, not just company press releases:

Talent Rover (Q140611173) — software company I co-founded, acquired by Bullhorn in 2018: The Boston Globe, March 13, 2018: https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/talking-points/2018/03/13/bullhorn-acquires-talent-rover-and-jobscience Staffing Industry Analysts, March 2018: https://www.staffingindustry.com/news/global-daily-news/bullhorn-buys-talent-rover-and-jobscience-planning-offer-platform-choices Inc. 5000, No. 151 in 2017: https://www.inc.com/profile/talent-rover Salesforce press release on the Adecco Group partnership, December 18, 2017: https://www.salesforce.com/news/press-releases/2017/12/18/the-adecco-group-teams-up-with-salesforce-talent-rover-and-accenture-to-build-new-solution-for-candidate-and-client-engagement/

Asymbl (Q140610575) — my current company: HR Brew, original reporting by Tricia Crimmins, July 8, 2026: https://www.hr-brew.com/stories/hr-agents-empathy-asymbl-servicenow diginomica, interview-based reporting by Jon Reed, June 9, 2026: https://diginomica.com/salesforce-connections-2026-slack-becoming-salesforces-best-weapon-pursuit-agentic-ux Salesforce customer story: https://www.salesforce.com/customer-stories/asymbl/

Brandon Metcalf (Q140610705) — the item about me was referenced to those same articles (I'm interviewed in both) and included a "different from" statement distinguishing me from Q4956978. I believe Talent Rover and Asymbl satisfy notability criterion 2 — clearly identifiable entities described using serious and publicly available references — and Q140610705 is needed for the founded-by statements on both to resolve.

I'd ask you to restore these items, or if you'd rather I go through Wikidata:Requests for undeletion, I'll do that instead. I won't recreate anything without guidance from you or the community, and if any individual statements need better sourcing, I'm glad to fix them.

Thank you for taking the time to look at this. Bmetcalf1978 (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bmetcalf1978 Please read Wikidata:Notability & Wikidata:Self-promotion. Reputable not self created Sources ar needed. None of the sources you cited (for all your items) are either reputable or independent. WikiBayer (talk) 11:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

@WikiBayerThank you for the response. I've read both pages, and I accept that my company's website and our press releases don't count — a number of my references were in that category, and that's on me.

Before I step back, I'd ask you to look at four specific sources, because none of them are self-created or company-issued:

The Boston Globe, staff news coverage of the Bullhorn acquisition of Talent Rover (March 13, 2018): https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/talking-points/2018/03/13/bullhorn-acquires-talent-rover-and-jobscience

Staffing Industry Analysts, independent trade press coverage of the same acquisition: https://www.staffingindustry.com/news/global-daily-news/bullhorn-buys-talent-rover-and-jobscience-planning-offer-platform-choices

diginomica, interview-based article by staff writer Jon Reed (June 9, 2026) covering Asymbl: https://diginomica.com/salesforce-connections-2026-slack-becoming-salesforces-best-weapon-pursuit-agentic-ux

HR Brew, reported article by journalist Tricia Crimmins (July 8, 2026) covering Asymbl alongside outside experts: https://www.hr-brew.com/stories/hr-agents-empathy-asymbl-servicenow

If Talent Rover and Asymbl supported by those references still fall short of the notability bar in your view, I'll accept that and won't pursue it further with you. If they could qualify with the self-published references stripped out, I'd ask for those two items to be restored so I can trim them down to the independent sourcing.

Either way, I appreciate you taking the time. Bmetcalf1978 (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

The Bostonglobe reports on the acquisition; while the article indirectly mentions the company, it focuses more on the larger corporation. Not every subsidiary of a large corporation gets a Item or is considered notable. I don't consider staffingindustry.com to be a reputable, independent source, besides, the same problem exists here.

The diginomica article should definitely not be considered a source in that sense. WikiBayer (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2026 (UTC)