Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014 Jun 25;44(8):219–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.03.007

Physical, Behavioral, and Cognitive Effects of Prenatal Tobacco and Postnatal Secondhand Smoke Exposure

Sherry Zhou a, David G Rosenthal b, Scott Sherman c, Judith Zelikoff a,c, Terry Gordon a,d, Michael Weitzman a,d,e
PMCID: PMC6876620  NIHMSID: NIHMS1059283  PMID: 25106748

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to examine the rapidly expanding literature regarding the effects of prenatal tobacco and postnatal secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure on child health and development. Mechanisms of SHS exposure are reviewed, including critical periods during which exposure to tobacco products appears to be particularly harmful to the developing fetus and child. The biological, biochemical, and neurologic effects of the small fraction of identified components of SHS are described. Research describing these adverse effects of both in utero and childhood exposure is reviewed, including findings from both animal models and humans. The following adverse physical outcomes are discussed: sudden infant death syndrome, low birth weight, decreased head circumference, respiratory infections, otitis media, asthma, childhood cancer, hearing loss, dental caries, and the metabolic syndrome. In addition, the association between the following adverse cognitive and behavioral outcomes and such exposures is described: conduct disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, poor academic achievement, and cognitive impairment. The evidence supporting the adverse effects of SHS exposure is extensive yet rapidly expanding due to improving technology and increased awareness of this profound public health problem. The growing use of alternative tobacco products, such as hookahs (a.k.a. waterpipes), and the scant literature on possible effects from prenatal and secondhand smoke exposure from these products are also discussed. A review of the current knowledge of this important subject has implications for future research as well as public policy and clinical practice.

Introduction

More than 1 billion people worldwide smoke tobacco products, and it is predicted that this remarkable number will reach 1.9 billion by 2025.1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are approximately 6 million deaths per year caused by tobacco, and the economic burden of increased tobacco-related morbidity and mortality runs in the hundreds of billions of dollars.2 Many smokers, however, remain unaware of the harmful consequences of their tobacco use for themselves, their families, as well as for the larger public. Many others, although knowing about these consequences to themselves and others, still have profound difficulty in quitting because of the addictive nature of nicotine.2

There are several ways children and adolescents can be exposed to tobacco. Prenatally, this occurs through maternal smoking or maternal secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. During childhood or adolescence, active smoking, SHS and thirdhand smoke are all possible means of exposure.

The first evidence statistically linking tobacco smoking with lung cancer appeared in the German journal Der Tabakgegner (The Tobacco Opponent) in 1912.3 Doll and Hill4 confirmed this finding in 1950 using elegantly developed epidemiologic techniques. These and other findings linking tobacco smoking and adverse health consequences became widely recognized worldwide by the 1964 publication in the U.S. of the seminal report entitled Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service.5 It is now authoritatively recognized that there is no safe level of exposure to tobacco smoke. Despite dramatic decreases in rates of cigarette smoking, tobacco use continues to be the leading cause of preventable premature death worldwide.6

In addition to the widely recognized effects of tobacco use and exposure on adult health, literature regarding the prenatal and postnatal physical effects of tobacco exposure on children is extensive and continues to grow. Prenatal exposure to tobacco and postnatal exposure to secondhand smoke are the leading preventable causes of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS),79 have been linked with intrauterine growth restriction and decreased head circumference among newborns, and are associated with numerous physical health problems during childhood including lower respiratory tract infections, asthma, otitis media, dental caries, hearing loss, and the metabolic syndrome.

Recently, research has examined the cognitive and behavioral effects of prenatal and postnatal SHS exposure. Animal models have elucidated that prenatal exposure to nicotine results in neurotoxic and neuro-modulatory effects on the brain that result in alterations of normal brain composition, causing impairments in learning, memory, hearing, and behavior. New studies are beginning to focus on dysregulation of specific genes and biochemical pathways by tobacco smoke exposure during the prenatal period, elucidating a novel mechanism that will be discussed in this article to explain the pathology.

In the words of Cuthbertson and Britton,10 failure to protect children exposed to SHS “is potentially catastrophic” for their future health. Our estimates are that every day of practice, each primary care physician seeing children for well child care will encounter on average 3 children who will die prematurely of tobacco-related exposure (unpublished data). Growing numbers of individuals and groups are actively calling for measures such as smoking bans in households and in public places to ensure the elimination of children’s exposure to SHS.11

Components of Secondhand Smoke

Secondhand smoke, also known as “environmental tobacco smoke” (ETS), refers to the smoke discharged from the lit end of a burned tobacco product as well as the smoke exhaled during active smoking.12 There are more than 4000 chemicals present in SHS, and more than 250 of these are known to be carcinogenic or toxic in some other way.13 Some of the toxic agents in SHS are as follows: “hydrogen cyanide (used in chemical weapons), carbon monoxide (found in car exhaust), butane (used in lighter fluid), ammonia (used in household cleaners), and toluene (found in paint thinner), arsenic (used in pesticides), lead (formerly found in paint), chromium (used to make steel), and cadmium (used to make batteries).”14 There also are additional recognized carcinogens in SHS, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNA), and numerous other hydrocarbons, aldehydes, organic compounds, and metals, although these agents have been less rigorously studied.6,12

Measurement of SHS Exposure

The ideal biomarker for SHS exposure has yet to be identified. Currently, the same markers used to measure active smoking are used to measure SHS exposure.15 Exposure to SHS is assessed indirectly by measuring the concentrations of carbon monoxide, thiocyanate, or nicotine metabolites such as cotinine.16 Although carbon monoxide and thiocyanate can reflect SHS exposure, they are not specific because they are found in multiple sources and can be produced from exposures to agents other than SHS.16

Cotinine is a direct metabolite of nicotine that has a longer half-life and a high specificity for SHS exposure.17 This chemical freely crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissues.18,19 Cotinine can be measured in saliva, blood, or urine, and indicates the amount of nicotine exposure over the past 3 days.20 It is currently unclear whether measurement of cotinine in meconium reflects exposures over a more extended period of time.21 After birth, breast milk is a potential source of nicotine exposure. Nicotine and cotinine can accumulate to concentrations two- to three-fold higher in breast milk than in plasma.22

New methods of postnatal cotinine detection, such as liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy, are being developed to quantitatively estimate exposure to SHS.23

Thirdhand Smoke

The term “thirdhand” smoke was coined in 2006, referring to residual matter from tobacco smoke that stays on surfaces and in dust.24 While many components of thirdhand smoke are the same as those in SHS, there are additional biologically active chemicals formed from reactions between SHS particles with chemicals such as ozone and gaseous oxide.24,25 Of great concern is that exposure to thirdhand smoke can occur in household with no active smokers. In fact, thirdhand smoke particles in homes of former smokes can be measured in new occupant’s urine and blood samples for up to 2 months after evacuation and cleaning.26 This study supports the 2006 statement from the Surgeon General of the U.S. Public Health Service that the most important environmental tobacco smoke exposure for children occurs in the home.27

Similar to the deleterious effects of prenatal SHS exposure, studies have shown that chemicals present in thirdhand smoke can cause damage to the lungs in utero. For instance, pulmonary damage via disrupted homeostatic signaling, stimulation of surfactant production and protein synthesis, and breakdown of alveolar epithelial–mesenchymal cross-talk have all been associated with thirdhand smoke exposure.25 Children are especially at increased risk from accumulation of these harmful chemicals because environmental dust with thirdhand smoke particles is present in higher concentrations and lower to the ground, such as floors and carpet, where children play.28

Mechanisms of Prenatal and Postnatal Tobacco Exposure

Critical Periods of Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure

A basic concept in child environmental health is that there are specific periods during development during which exposure to specific toxic chemicals, including those in tobacco smoke, is especially harmful. Almost every developing organ system, including the lungs, brain, heart, and ears, appears to be affected by prenatal exposure to tobacco15,29,30 (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Prevalence of smoking before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and after delivery, aBy year—Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, United States, 10 sites, b2000–2010.1 Abbreviation: PRAMS = Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. aSmoking before pregnancy was defined as smoking 3 months before pregnancy on the basis of the PRAMS survey. Smoking during pregnancy was defined as smoking during the last 3 months of pregnancy on the basis of the PRAMS survey. Smoking after delivery was defined as smoking approximately 4 months after delivery on the basis of the PRAMS survey. bData aggregated for 10 PRAMS sites (Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Utah, Washington, and West Virginia) with data available for all years. §Significant linear trend (p ≤ 0.05).

Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Prevalence of smoking during pregnancya—Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, United States, 27 sites, b2010.1 Abbreviation: PRAMS = Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. aSmoking during pregnancy was defined as smoking during the last 3 months of pregnancy on the basis of the PRAMS survey. bData aggregated for 27 PRAMS sites (Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, New York City, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming) with data available for 2010. Births for New York City are reported separate. Tong VT, Dietz PM, Morrow B, et al. Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy—pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, United States, 40 sites, 2000–2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013;62(6):1–19.

Postnatally, infancy appears to be the period associated with the highest risk of respiratory, neurological, and immunological morbidity.30,31 For example, the risk of bronchitis and pneumonia from SHS exposure is highest in infancy,15 and early postnatal SHS exposure is associated both with increased rates of hospitalization for respiratory illness and bronchial hyper-responsiveness during the first 6 months of life.32 As children get older, rates of such complications decrease, perhaps because of diminished exposure as they spend less time in the presence of parents and so have decreased SHS exposure.33

Biological Mechanisms

Prenatal tobacco exposure results in alterations in fetal blood flow and protein metabolism as well as the accumulation of certain chemicals both in the mother and the fetus. Each of these can contribute to or cause adverse consequences. Levels of maternal and fetal carboxyhemoglobin may be elevated, depending upon the intensity of maternal smoking or exposure to others who are smoking, leading to chronic fetal hypoxic stress.34 Certain chemicals present in cigarette smoke cause vasospasm of vessels supplying the placenta, increasing placental vascular resistance and resulting in further reduction in blood flow to the fetus.3539

In animal models, nicotine has been shown to have teratogenic effects on neurodevelopment.40,41 Marked alterations in neurotransmitters alter neuronal pathways both before and after birth.15 A recent study suggested that the marked neurologic effects of fetal tobacco exposure are the result of alterations in the developmental trajectory of synaptic function rather than of a single neurotoxic injury.42 This results in synaptic dysregulation, with presynaptic neurons being juxtaposed to incorrect target cells, thereby resulting in impaired synaptic communication.4247

Nicotine exposure causes upregulation of the 5-HT (serotonin) transporter and receptor in male rats, whereas females experience a downregulation of the 5-HT-1A receptor subtype.42 In addition, the number of hippocampal muscarinic receptors is increased.48,49 These changes cause a high turnover of serotonin and dopamine, resulting in an overall deficit in these neurotransmitters.42 Consequences of these changes include impaired dopaminergic activity and reduced serotonin uptake in many areas of the brain, including the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens.50,51

Nicotine exposure increases the number of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors globally, but with certain regional preferences. The α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α4β2nAChR) shows the greatest increase in the occipital cortex, followed by the frontal cortex and hippocampus, with lesser increases seen in the caudate. As a consequence, the caudate nucleus, a critical component of reward pathways involving nicotine, is actually less sensitive than other areas in the brain. It also has been shown that nicotine exposure decreases the total cell number and number of cell projections in specific areas of the brain, with the caudate affected most severely.45 These alterations in the brain result in increased fetal susceptibility to cholinergic effects, including tachycardia and fetal hypoxia. Such changes may contribute to increased risk of SIDS and other fetal morbidities.45,52 There also is impaired development of noradrenergic presynaptic projections and postsynaptic beta-receptor binding capabilities. This results in an increase of noradrenergic receptor sites in the cerebral cortex.5355

While the negative effects of only a fraction of the chemicals in tobacco smoke have been studied, the full spectrum of adverse health consequences of the thousands of harmful substances in tobacco and tobacco smoke will likely never be fully appreciated.

Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Tobacco Exposure

Physical Effects

Evidence From Animal Models

Animal models provide information about prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure that cannot be elucidated by human studies.

Feng et al.56 reported that prenatal nicotine exposure increases the risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias in rats aged 4–5 months. Fu et al.57 also showed that prenatal nicotine exposure upregulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in bronchial epithelial cells, predisposing infants to bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Animal models also have documented a dose-dependent relationship58,59 between prenatal nicotine exposure and low birth weight.60

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

The World Health Organization and many other international groups have assiduously reviewed the evidence linking prenatal and childhood SHS exposure and SIDS, and it is now accepted by the scientific, public health, and pediatric communities that tobacco exposure is the most common preventable cause of SIDS.61

An extensive epidemiologic literature indicates a causal relationship between both prenatal tobacco and postnatal SHS exposure and SIDS, including a meta-analysis with 35 case–control studies world-wide.62 The authors found that prenatal maternal smoking was associated with significantly increased risk of SIDS (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 2.03–2.50), and postnatal maternal smoking had a comparable effect (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.77–2.19). Furthermore, smoking cessation during pregnancy is found to decrease the incidence of SIDS.63

As the main neurotoxic component of cigarette smoke, nicotine is hypothesized to affect neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in brainstem nuclei in a manner that results in diminished respiration and arousal during sleep.64 This leading hypothesis suggesting a possible mechanism linking SHS exposure and SIDS is called the “brainstem hypothesis”65 since the brainstem is responsible for controlling temperature control, breathing, blood pressure, chemosensitivity, and upper airway reflexes. This hypothesis suggests that SIDS may be due, at least in part, to impairment of these basal functions, which “impairs the infant’s response to life-threatening, but often occurring, stressors during sleep (e.g., hypoxia, hypercarbia, asphyxia, and hyperthermia) and leads to sudden death in a vulnerable developmental period.”66

A recent study explored this hypothesis mechanistically by comparing the α7 and β2 subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in 8 nuclei of the medulla and 7 nuclei of the pons among 46 SIDS and 14 non-SIDS infants.67 The authors discovered that compared to non-SIDS infants, SIDS infant had significantly decreased α7 and β2 subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, suggesting that SIDS infants responded differently to cigarette smoke exposure that likely predisposed them to the lethal consequences of cigarette smoke.

Another characteristic of SIDS is upregulation of serotonin receptors in the brain. It has been shown that prenatal tobacco exposure elicits hyperactivity of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine pathways, resulting in consequent deficits of these neurotransmitters.68 This in turn results in cardiac sympathetic innervation being decreased, increasing the vulnerability of the fetus and infant to hypoxia during times of stress.

Low Birth Weight

Tobacco smoke exposure is the most important determinant resulting in low birth weight after adjusting for gestational age at the time of birth.69,70 Approximately twice as many mothers who smoke or are exposed to SHS experience term low-birth-weight deliveries (small for gestational age babies) compared to mothers who are not exposed.69 Pregnant non-smokers who are exposed to SHS have an increased risk of giving birth to a child with low birth weight, although with less severity than prenatal maternal smokers.7174 Birth weight has been shown to be improved by reducing or eliminating smoking during pregnancy.75,76 It is estimated that the hospital costs for preterm birth/low-birth-weight births, during the first year of life, totaled near $6 billion in the U.S.77

Reduced birth weight itself, irrespective of tobacco exposure, is independently associated with an increased risk for the behavioral and cognitive problems that are discussed throughout this review. These problems include hyperactivity, learning disabilities, anxiety, and decreased IQ.7880

Decreased Head Circumference

Numerous studies have found that prenatal tobacco exposure is inversely related to head circumference at birth, and that this decrease can persist throughout childhood.81 In utero brain weight has been shown to be a function of fetal head circumference.82 Studies have demonstrated a 0.13-mm83 to 0.56-mm84 reduction per week in fetal head circumference among children exposed to tobacco prenatally. Overall, prenatal tobacco use is associated with a 0.72–0.89-cm decrease in fetal head circumference.85

The association between decreased head circumference and decreased brain volume is strongest in younger children.86 The mean performance IQ in children with low brain volume has been found to be reduced by 15 points compared to individuals with medium total brain volume.86 In 4-year-olds, full scale IQ is increased by 2.41 points for each standard deviation increase in newborn head circumference and is increased by 1.97 points for each standard deviation increase after birth.87 The majority of studies show that the head circumference of these children catches up to normal values as they age; one study, however, found that these decreases in head circumference persist throughout childhood.88

Although the entire brain size is decreased by prenatal tobacco exposure, specific areas of the brain are preferentially affected. The decrease in head circumference appears to be related to reductions in cortical gray matter and total parenchymal volumes.89 Other studies indicate that prenatal smoke exposure is related to fractional anisotropy in anterior cortical white matter and in the corticofugal fibers of the internal capsule of the brain,90 reduction of the mass of the frontal lobe and cerebellum,91 and a deficit of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.36

Impaired brain development and growth during fetal life, infancy, and early childhood is associated with decreased cognitive functions among the elderly.87 Individuals with larger head circumferences between the ages of 66 and 75 years show less cognitive decline and score higher on intelligence tests compared to those with smaller head circumferences.85

As the data have shown, the effect of SHS on head circumference is not limited to childhood, and the deficits caused by these neurological effects persist throughout life.

Upper Respiratory Tract Illnesses

Exposure to SHS is independently associated with an increased incidence of middle ear disease, adenoid hypertrophy, tonsillitis, pharyngitis, and snoring among infants.15 This results in an increased incidence of tonsillectomies, higher rates of antibiotic use, and a greater incidence of hospitalization for respiratory illness.15

Ear Infections.

The research literature documenting the association between SHS exposure and otitis media is extensive and conclusive.2,14,92 The morbidity associated with the ear is not only limited to otitis media but also includes tympanic membrane perforation, cholesteatoma, and sensorineural hearing loss.93

As early as 1998, a systematic review revealed a causal relationship between SHS exposure and otitis media, middle ear effusion, and surgery for these conditions.94 In a subsequent meta-analysis of 61 studies from 1997 to 2010 on the association between SHS exposure and middle ear disease in children, the authors found that maternal postnatal smoking significantly increased the risk of middle ear disease in children (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.33–1.97) as did living with a household smoker (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25–1.50). In contrast, paternal smoking was not associated with a significantly increased risk of childhood middle ear disease (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98–1.5). Additionally, this study identified that the main consequence of childhood exposure to SHS was the increased risk of having to have surgery for chronic middle ear diseases.95 SHS exposure is, therefore, the leading preventable cause of children’s middle ear infection, and as such is the leading cause of outpatient prescriptions for antibiotics.9698

Lower Respiratory Tract Illnesses

The association between SHS exposure and respiratory tract infections in children is very well-established.99 Smoking during pregnancy actually confers an additional risk compared to postnatal exposure alone, and maternal smoking during pregnancy is independently associated with an almost 4-fold increase in respiratory disease in infants.15 The impaired immunologic effects of SHS exposure pre-disposes children not only to respiratory infection but also to allergy and bronchial hyper-responsiveness.100

Both prenatal and postnatal exposure to tobacco is associated with decreased pulmonary function.101,102 Adverse lung effects begin as early as pregnancy demonstrated by one study that found a reduction in fetal lung growth by 33 weeks of gestation.103 A meta-analysis in 1996 found that children exposed to SHS experienced a 1.4% reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 s, a 5% decrease in mid-expiratory flow rate, and a 4.3% decrease in end-expiratory flow rate,104 yet the mechanism of damage has not been elucidated.101

An updated meta-analysis in 2011 extensively examined the evidence of passive smoke exposure and risk of lower respiratory tract infection in infants.95 Among the 60 studies identified, smoking by either parent significantly increased the risk of lower respiratory tract infection (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10–1.35). The odds ratio increased to 1.62 (95% CI: 1.38–1.89) if both parents smoked and was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.40–1.69) if any household member smoked. Overall, postnatal smoking had a stronger effect than prenatal in causing lower respiratory tract infections, especially bronchiolitis.

Asthma.

The relationship between SHS exposure and childhood asthma is widely believed to be causal in nature.30,105,106 A meta-analysis in 1998 by Strachan and Cook107 based on 6 studies of asthma incidence, 7 of prognosis, 22 case–controls, and 10 case series found that if either parent smoked cigarettes, the odds ratio of developing childhood asthma was 1.37. Additionally, maternal smoking was associated with an increased incidence of wheezing illness up to the age of 6 years (pooled odds ratio = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.22–1.41), but less strongly thereafter (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04–1.22).106109

Since 1998, a plethora of studies have emerged on the health effects of exposure to prenatal and postnatal smoking on childhood incidence of wheeze and asthma. Consequently, a more updated meta-analysis in 2012 by Burke et al.110 identified 79 prospective studies and found that exposure to prenatal or postnatal SHS was associated with as much as 70% increased risk of incident wheezing with strongest effect from postnatal maternal smoking on wheeze in children aged ≤2 years (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.24–2.35). Moreover, incident asthma was increased between 21% and 85% with strongest effect from prenatal maternal smoking on asthma in children aged ≤2 years (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.35–2.53).

Both asthma prevalence and severity are increased in children exposed to SHS,111 and affected children have a greater number of visits to the emergency department,112 hospitalization, and a greater risk of intubation.113 Although the mechanisms by which SHS exposure causes these effects have not clearly been elucidated, children’s higher blood cotinine levels are associated with increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness.103 When child and adolescent exposure to SHS is reduced, the severity of asthma is decreased.114

Third-Generation Effects of In Utero Smoking on Asthma.

Although abundant evidence suggests that in utero exposure to maternal smoking increases asthma risk, exacerbates preexisting asthma, and adversely affects postnatal lung function,104,115120 research continues to explore other novel associations of smoking during pregnancy with asthma risk. One study reported that grandmaternal smoking during the mother’s fetal period was linked to increased asthma risk in her grandchildren,121 suggesting the burden of maternal smoking was possibly underestimated and that the inheritance of asthma susceptibility could very well be through epigenetic mechanisms. To study this possibility, Rehan et al.122 used a well-established rat model and found that first-generation offspring of nicotine-treated pregnant rats not only exhibited asthma-like changes in lung function but also epigenetic changes to DNA and histones in both lungs and gonads. They reported, for the first time, that transgenerational transmission of the asthma phenotype was observed in third-generation offspring following perinatal nicotine exposure of the first generation. Therefore, epigenetic as well as genetic mechanisms appear to play an important role in SHS and asthma in children.

Increased Risk of Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Infections

Although it is well-established that maternal smoking is associated with infant respiratory infections, such as pneumonia, bronchitis, bronchiolitis,95,123128 and pulmonary tuberculosis,129,130 growing literature suggests that it is also linked to infectious diseases, such as otitis media,2,14,92,124,131,132 bacterial meningitis,128,133135 necrotizing enterocilitis,136 and increased risk of vertical HIV transmission,137,138 all of which greatly jeopardize infant health. A study by Metzger et al.139 found that infants who were hospitalized or died due to infection during the first year of life were 50% more likely to have had mothers who smoked than those who did not. In subgroup analyses, the authors found that maternal smoking was associated with infant hospitalization due to both respiratory and nonrespiratory infectious diseases.

Effects of Maternal Smoking on Delayed Immune Development

Research has illustrated the complex interactions between antenatal environment and the maturation of fetal immune system. Cytokines are an important part of the immune system and contribute to the development of various allergic diseases, such as atopy and asthma.140142 In a prospective cohort study, Macaubas et al.143 found an inverse relationship between cord blood concentrations of cytokines, such as IL4, IL-γ, and TNFα and the risk of asthma, atopy, or both in children at the age of 6 years. More importantly, these investigators found that maternal smoking was associated with lower concentrations of IL4, IL-γ, and TNFα in cord blood, suggesting a higher likelihood for the child to develop allergic diseases later in life. Moreover, the authors found that infants born to ex-smoking mothers had cord blood concentrations of IL4 and IL-γ intermediate between those of nonsmokers and current smokers, suggesting that the adverse pregnancy outcomes due to maternal smoking may not be entirely preventable by smoking cessation during pregnancy.

SHS and Epigenetic Changes

As noted earlier, it is well-known that tobacco use adversely modifies pregnancy outcomes, resulting in higher perinatal and obstetric complications, such as premature birth, low-birth-weight infants, and impaired lung function,144,145 the mechanism has yet to be elucidated. Some proposed hypotheses include fetal hypoxia,145 carbon monoxide,146 and nicotine exposure.147 More recently, research has focused on the role of epigenetics in maternal tobacco smoke exposure’s effects on fetal growth. Exposure to tobacco smoke can alter gene expression through epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation. In general, aberration of DNA methylation is a typical mechanism of epigenetic change.148 Studies have shown that maternal smoking during pregnancy can alter DNA methylation patterns in myriad locations. For example, it has been found that maternal tobacco use is associated with placental DNA methylation in genes crucial for the proper growth and development of the fetus.146,149 Guerrero-Preston et al.150 found that global DNA methylation was most reduced in cord blood from newborns whose mothers smoked during pregnancy. In addition to the methylation pattern alterations in placental and cord blood, maternal smoking is also associated with methylation changes in leukocytes151 and neurons of the central and peripheral nervous systems associated with cognitive performance, executive function, behaviors, and mental health.152155

Associations of Exposure to Paternal Smoking and Risk of Developing Childhood Cancer

The relationship between prenatal and postnatal exposure to secondhand smoke and subsequent risk of childhood cancer has been studied in multiple epidemiological studies in the past 2 decades. A meta-analysis by Boffetta et al.156 reviewed over 30 epidemiologic studies of exposure to secondhand smoke and development of childhood neoplasms and lung cancer. Their results, based on 12 studies, suggested a small (approximately 10%) increase in risk of all neoplasms, except leukemia and CNS tumors (RR = 1.10, CI: 1.03–1.19), among children exposed to prenatal maternal tobacco smoke. Interestingly, the authors found that there was an association between paternal smoking with brain tumors based on 10 studies (RR = 1.22, CI: 1.05–1.40) and lymphomas based on 4 studies (RR = 2.08, CI: 2.08–3.98). However, more data are needed to confirm that parental tobacco smoke, especially paternal, is a risk factor for developing childhood cancer.

SHS Exposure and Hearing Loss

Recently, studies have begun to investigate the association between exposure to SHS and hearing loss.157 Cigarette smoke damages the entire cochlea, causing hearing loss across the entire frequency spectrum.158 Smokers are up to twice as likely to experience hearing loss as compared to nonsmokers after adjusting for multiple potential confounders.159 Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure has been found to be independently associated with higher pure-tone hearing thresholds and a nearly three-fold increase in unilateral low-frequency hearing loss among adolescents.157,160

Prenatal smoke exposure is associated with decreased performance on auditory tasks as early as the neonatal period161163 and a dose-dependent relationship between SHS exposure and decreased auditory-related tasks.164,165 In utero exposure, even if the mother quits smoking during the first trimester of pregnancy, may be injurious to the developing auditory system, which also develops during the first trimester.166 These hearing deficits may contribute to the cognitive and behavioral deficits that persist throughout life.165

Although no mechanism has been established to explain the association between hearing loss and SHS exposure,157 proposed mechanisms include fetal malnourishment due to altered placental architecture,167 fetal hypoxia due to vasoconstriction,168 or direct damage by nicotine or other chemicals present in cigarette smoke.160 Very similar findings have recently been published concerning prenatal tobacco exposure and sensorineural hearing loss.169

SHS Exposure and Dental Caries

Exposure to SHS has been found to be independently associated with an almost doubled risk of dental caries.170 Three major mechanisms are proposed to explain this phenomenon.171 The first involves the direct exposure of the developing teeth to the chemicals present in SHS. Nicotine and heavy metals such as cadmium may impair mineralization of tooth, and smoking during pregnancy may be related to delayed tooth formation.172174 The chemicals in SHS also result in injury to the salivary glands, which decreases buffering capacity and salivary flow rate.175 Third, SHS increases colonization of the oral mucosa by cariogenic bacteria including Streptococcus mutans,171 and impairs immune function and blood levels of vitamin C, which have been implicated in the formation of dental caries.176,177

SHS Exposure and the Metabolic Syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is a combination of glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, obesity, and hypertension.178 The association between metabolic syndrome and SHS exposure has been well-studied and validated in a number of countries.179181 One recent study found that SHS exposure both before and after birth increases the risk of obesity in children at 6 years of age up to 4.4-fold.181

While it is difficult to explain the exact mechanism underlying this phenomenon due to the numerous behavioral, social, and genetic influences on child growth, a number of hypotheses have been developed. The “thrifty phenotype hypothesis,” also known as Barker’s hypothesis, explains that “early-life metabolic adaptations promote survival, with the developing organism responding to cues of environmental quality by selecting an appropriate trajectory of growth.”182 Proponents of this idea argue that a fetus exposed to SHS, while small for gestational age in utero, would adopt metabolic characteristics to survive in a nutrition-poor environment. Postnatally, the risk of the metabolic syndrome and other associated morbidities would be exacerbated if the infant is exposed to conditions discordant to those in utero, such as the “toxic” diet of western society.182

Another theory postulates that because children born to smokers are more likely to be small, metabolic syndrome is the result of the postnatal growth “catch-up.”183 Others propose that neuroendocrine imbalances caused by SHS exposure contribute to metabolic syndrome.184 Another theory points toward behavioral differences observed between smoking and non-smoking mothers such as breastfeeding frequency,185,186 physical activity, and overall nutrition.187

In addition to the thoroughly studied association between the metabolic syndrome and SHS exposure in children, a study by Cutler et al. found that children living with smokers are twice as likely to experience food insecurity, or the inability to access food in a socially acceptable way every day of the year, than children not living with smokers.188 Food insecurity is associated with poor physical health, neuropsychological development, and poor academic achievement in children.188

Behavioral and Cognitive Effects

Evidence From Animal Models

Nicotine interferes with neurodevelopment, “altering the formation, survival, and differentiation of brain cells, eliciting deficits in structure, synaptic function, and behavioral performance.”189 Nicotine exposure causes premature neuronal differentiation, increasing the cholinergic effects on neurological processes such as mitosis, cellular communication, and neuronal path finding during differentiation.190 Both prenatal and postnatal nicotine exposure cause sex-selective cholinergic hypoactivity in male rats, which can explain the observed effects in humans of “affective, appetitive and sleep disorders in the offspring of women who smoke during pregnancy as well as in adolescent smokers.”43,191196 In addition, a study using rats showed that the concentration of brain DNA was decreased in rats exposed to nicotine.197,198

Animal studies have shown that prenatal exposure to nicotine causes increased motor activity, hyperactivity, and problems with attention, memory, and learning.199,200 One such study found a dose-dependent relationship between levels of nicotine exposure and “stimulation of locomotor activity in offspring,” reporting “involvement of both mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways.”200 SHS exposure in the perinatal period is sufficient to raise levels of nicotine to concentrations great enough to alter normal neurodevelopment.201 It has been shown that the amount of brain damage is equally severe in terms of magnitude and regional selectivity between perinatally and postnatally exposed groups. The nature of the neuromodulation includes cell loss, cell hypertrophy, and neurite formation, a marker of potential damage to neuronal projections.189

Adverse Behavioral Outcomes in Human Studies

Although the nature of human research is fundamentally different from that using animal models, the evidence provided by human studies also strongly suggests that exposure to tobacco smoke, both prenatally and postnatally, increases the risk of poor behavioral and cognitive outcomes in children.

Multiple studies have found children exposed prenatally to tobacco smoke to have increased rates of behavior problems. An early longitudinal study found that such children exhibit overall worse behavior and that they also had increased rates of specific problems like hyperactivity, oppositional defiant disorder, delinquency, and both internalizing and externalizing behaviors.202 A cross-sectional study reported a dose-dependent response between children with prenatal exposure and “hyperactivity/inattention” and “conduct problems,”202 and others have directly linked prenatal tobacco smoke exposure to conduct disorder and ADHD, adjusting for multiple potential confounders and covariates such as income, parental antisocial tendencies, prematurity, birth weight, and poor parenting practices.203

Among children exposed to tobacco smoke either prenatally or postnatally, increased rates of behavioral problems are seen very early in life. Newborns exposed in utero have heightened startle responses, tremors, hypertonicity,164 and have more severe reactions to bowel movements and diapering, and tend to cry more and be more fussy.204 By 18 months, children exposed to SHS in utero manifest increased externalizing behaviors, including defiance, not responding to punishment, inability to pay attention, and hyperactivity.205

During pre-school years, children prenatally or postnatally exposed show more externalizing behavioral problems than unexposed children.206,207 Some of the more common problems include demanding attention, changes in mood, emotional instability, arguing, aggression, and destructive behavior.207,208 The adverse effects seen in early childhood tend to persist into adolescence.209214 Children exposed prenatally to SHS are more likely to exhibit aggression, break rules, and display still other behavioral problems.215

Studies have attempted to separate the effects of prenatal and postnatal maternal smoking and child behavior, although this presents very difficult methodologic problems. The 2006 Surgeon General’s Report points out that this is a daunting challenge, since most women who smoke during pregnancy continue to do so after the birth of the child.14 A study by Weitzman et al.216 showed that postnatal smoking alone and prenatal and postnatal smoking together were each independently associated with behavioral problems in children in a dose-dependent fashion. Findings from still another study show that while both prenatal and postnatal exposures are associated with increased likelihoods of having abnormal behavior, those exposed during the prenatal period were 90% more likely to be classified as abnormal, whereas children exclusively exposed only postnatally were 30% more likely.217

The effect of controlling for potential confounders on examining associations between maternal smoking and behavioral problems in their offspring is a significant hurdle in elucidating meaningful conclusions from the data. Studies have been conducted suggesting that maternal smoking is either marginally associated or not independently associated with behavioral problems, and the link could be completely accounted for by confounding factors.218 Contrary to this finding in select studies, Weitzman et al.219 explained in a review article that the vast majority of studies that take these confounders into account report a positive correlation between maternal smoking and behavior problems even though there may exist differences between non-smoking and smoking mothers. Furthermore, animal studies contradict the notion that confounders alone (rather than tobacco smoke) are the cause of the behavioral problems seen in exposed children.219

Conduct Disorder

Studies have found that children born to mothers who smoke more than a half pack of cigarettes per day during pregnancy are approximately 4 times more likely to have conduct disorders, and that they experience increased rates of oppositional defiant disorder and delinquency.220222 Another study reported that this relationship between tobacco smoke exposure and conduct disorder may be confounded by multiple factors, including an increased prevalence of smoking among young people, poorer education of mothers of lower socioeconomic status, higher prevalence of smoking among women with depressive or antisocial traits, and the idea that prenatal smoking could be a marker of genetic risk for antisocial behavior.223 Clearly, further research needs to be done on this topic to account for all of these confounders.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

The association between ADHD and SHS exposure was reported as early as 1975 in a study that found that mothers who smoked were 3 times more likely to have “hyperkinetic” children.224 Review articles examining almost 40 years of research show that in utero exposure to tobacco smoke is a risk factor for ADHD and similar behavioral disorders,225 and the risk of developing ADHD has been reported from 2.4 to 3.4 times higher than among children not exposed.226,227 Of all of the factors implicated in causing ADHD, maternal smoking during pregnancy has been found to be the most important risk factor identified to date.227

The majority of studies relating prenatal and postnatal SHS exposure to ADHD show a positive and dose-dependent correlation, but some do not take into account important confounders such as familial ADHD, making the ability to establish a causal relationship more difficult. More recent studies have accounted for these confounders.228 A twin cohort study showed that prenatal substance abuse beyond the first trimester is associated with a 3.8-fold increased risk of ADHD after adjustment for maternal genetics.229 Thapar et al.230 found that when confounders such as genetic factors, shared and non-shared environmental influences, birth weight, social adversity, and antisocial symptom scores were considered, maternal smoking was still found to be significant.

Using data from the 1992–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), Braun et al. examined the link between tobacco exposure, lead exposure, and ADHD. Adjusting for confounders, prenatal lead exposure and tobacco exposure were each significantly associated with ADHD with odds ratios of 4.1 and 2.5, respectively. The investigators reported that 32.2% of ADHD cases among children between the ages of 4 and 15 years can be attributed either to prenatal smoke exposure or increased blood lead levels (>2 μg/dL); the investigators could not, however, control for prenatal exposure to other substances or family history of mental health and ADHD.231 Another study suggested that up to 38.2% of ADHD cases among children aged 8–15 years could be attributed to either prenatal smoke exposure, blood lead concentrations above 1.3 μg/dL, or both; the population attributable fraction for prenatal tobacco exposure alone was reported as 21.7% and for blood lead concentrations above 1.3 μg/dL was 25.4%.232

Several studies have examined the interaction between dopaminergic genes and SHS exposure in the etiology of childhood ADHD. One study showed that children with 2 copies of a dopamine transporter gene polymorphism are more likely to develop ADHD in the presence of maternal smoking.233,234 Children with the DAT1 440 allele, or DRD4 7-repeat allele, and a history of prenatal tobacco smoke exposure were found to be 1.8 and 2.1 times more likely, respectively, to be diagnosed with DSM-IV combined subtype ADHD.235 Children with prenatal tobacco smoke exposure plus one such allele were found to be 3 times more likely to have an ADHD diagnosis, and children with both alleles plus maternal prenatal smoke exposure were 9 times more likely to have “population-defined” ADHD diagnosis than children with neither risk factor.235 In contrast, a recent study found no gene–environment interaction between children with the DRD4 7-repeat allele, prenatal SHS exposure, and the diagnosis of ADHD.236 Still another study found that only males containing the DAT1 genotype showed a gene–environment interaction with prenatal smoke exposure and ADHD; no such correlation was found in females.237 Although further research is needed to clarify these discrepancies, the studies represent a new frontier for discerning the relationship between behavioral problems such as ADHD and prenatal tobacco smoke exposure.

Cognitive Impairments and School Performance

Impaired cognitive function appears to be still another consequence of prenatal tobacco or childhood SHS exposure, manifesting as lower scores on intelligence tests and achievement tests, and in poor school performance. In New York City alone, it has been estimated that the annual cost of interventional services as a result of exposure to tobacco smoke is approximately $100 million.238 Despite the many studies showing an association between tobacco smoke exposure and cognitive impairments, some suggest that confounders and certain methodological limitations negatively affect the validity of these conclusions.239,240 One study found that, after accounting for maternal education, there was no correlation between tobacco smoke exposure and children’s impairments of cognitive abilities.240 Breslau et al.241 reported that although children aged 6–11 years exposed prenatally to tobacco smoke scored lower on the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised and on the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale Third Edition (for those aged 17 years), these results could be fully attributed to maternal IQ and education. Another recent study showed that after comparing smoking habits across 2 pregnancies, the cognitive impairments seen among children with smoking mothers were also seen in a successive pregnancy in which the mother did not smoke, thus suggesting that the association between cognitive impairments and prenatal tobacco smoke exposure could be explained by parental education, as well as other confounders.242,243 Multiple studies that have found a significant inverse relationship between prenatal tobacco and childhood SHS exposure and child intelligence scores failed to account for parental intelligence, which is believed to be the most important factor in child intelligence.244246

Despite these problems, other studies have attempted to account for many of the common potential confounders. One such study examined prenatal maternal smoking and offspring intelligence, finding that children born to smoking mothers have a 6-point decrease in IQ at 18 years of age compared to children born to non-smoking mothers. Confounders such as parental social status, parental education, single mother status, mother’s height and age, number of pregnancies, and gestational age were taken into account.247 Another examined the learning outcomes in adolescents prenatally exposed to tobacco smoke, finding that academic achievement suffered in children exposed to SHS even after adjusting for confounders.248

A recent hypothesis attempting to explain the link between children’s exposure to tobacco smoke and cognitive impairments suggests that sleep fragmentation is often seen in children exposed to SHS, which might explain the decrease in IQ seen in these children.249 An increase in arousal frequency of snoring infants, as well as a inverse relationship between respiratory arousal index (central apnea, desaturation, and snoring) and Mental Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development has been found in households with smokers.249 Others have confirmed these findings, demonstrating that after accounting for potential confounding variables such as socioeconomic status, marital status, physical abuse, prenatal medical care, and postnatal cigarette smoke exposure, there remains an independent association between prenatal nicotine exposure and children’s sleep problems persisting throughout the first 12 years of life,250 including longer sleep-onset delay, sleep-disordered breathing, parasomnias, daytime sleepiness, and overall sleep disturbance.246

Numerous studies have documented the association between child tobacco exposure and poorer school performance. One reported that children exposed to parental SHS are 50% more likely to repeat kindergarten or first grade.251 Another found lower scores on mathematics and spelling tests (but not reading tests) associated with maternal smoking. Although this study accounted for maternal education and child behavioral problems, it did not control for parental IQ.252 Still another found children prenatally exposed to tobacco to be at a higher risk for failing to regulate physical aggression.253 Many questions remain about the validity of findings of the relationship between maternal prenatal smoking and cognitive impairments among children.

Prenatal SHS Effects of Alternative Tobacco Products

While cigarette use has dramatically decreased in recent years, there has been a marked upsurge in adolescent and young adult use of new, non-cigarette tobacco products, commonly referred to as alternative tobacco products. Although the total consumption of cigarettes in the U.S. has decreased 33% between 2000 and 2011,254 the consumption of alternative tobacco products such as hookahs (waterpipes), cigarillos, cigars, bidis, kreteks, and smokeless tobacco (snuff, dip, snus, and chewing tobacco) has increased an alarming 123% over the same time period. Many alternative tobacco products are from regions of the world where their use is culturally rooted and widely diffused into mainstream U.S. culture. Such regions include South Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, regions with great numbers of immigrants to the U.S. In contrast to the extensive literature on the serious effects of both mainstream and secondhand cigarette smoke, research on the health consequences of alternative tobacco products is in its infancy. Additionally, there is an even more marked paucity of data about the effect of child health and development of prenatal and postnatal secondhand exposure to alternative tobacco products.

One of the few published prevalence studies of alternative tobacco product use among pregnant women, a multicenter, cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of 7961 pregnant women in 9 developing nations showed a very wide variation in the prevalence of current use of non-cigarette tobacco products. For example, rates of usage varied from 6% in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 33.5% in Orissa, India, and 4.9% in Karnataka, India.255 These data did not, unfortunately, allow for detailed investigation of basic sociodemographic characteristics of users versus nonusers or the type of alternative tobacco product used. More important for public policy and clinical practice in the U.S., there are no comparable data about the prevalence of use of any alternative tobacco products among pregnant women.

Hookahs

Hookahs (also called waterpipes, nargiles, or hubble-bubble) originated in India in the 15th century, and their use then expanded into the Middle East and all of South Asia.256 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention characterizes them as devices used to smoke specially made tobacco and non-tobacco herbal shisha available in a variety of flavors.257 In most hookahs, charcoal is placed on top of punctured aluminum foil.258,259 When the user sucks in air from a mouthpiece, heat from the charcoal warms the tobacco creating smoke, which is then passed through water in the pipe before inhalation.258,259 Hookah users tend to perceive hookah as a safer and less addictive alternative to cigarettes although evidence suggests that hookah use may actually be more harmful and addictive than cigarettes.260,261 A single waterpipe session can equate to smoking up to 100 cigarettes and yield greater levels of nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide than cigarettes.262,263

Hookah use is extremely popular among women in many non-Western societies, especially in the Middle East as well as South Asia (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka).264,265 Studies in Lebanon have found that 5.4–6.1% of pregnant women use hookah.266,267 Another Lebanese study found that while smokers of either hookah or cigarettes were partially knowledgeable about the health risks of cigarette smoking, they knew virtually nothing about the harmful ingredients of hookah smoking and had many misconceptions regarding how hookah worked or how it could produce harm.268 These studies emphasized the importance of more rigorous research to begin to better inform the public and develop other public health and clinical policies to prevent uptake and encourage the cessation of use.

In a study of 106 pregnant hookah users and 512 nonusers in Lebanon, no significant reduction in infant birth weight was found among babies of hookah users. Infants born to hookah smokers in this study, however, had an increased risk of having low Apgar scores, malformations (e.g., cardiac and hip anomalies and hydrocephalus), perinatal complications (e.g., jaundice, respiratory difficulties, and prolapse of the cord) as well as significant increases in infant respiratory distress.269 A more extensive retrospective cohort study of 8592 women in 6 major hospitals in Beirut, Lebanon, from 2000 to 2003 found that 4.4% of pregnant women were exclusive hookah smokers and that mothers smoking hookah more than once per day were at a 2.4 increased odds of having low-birth-weight infants compared with nonsmokers.266 The association of hookah use during pregnancy was also examined in a study in Southern Iran, where it was found that hookah smoking during pregnancy is a risk factor for low-birth-weight babies, and that mothers who started smoking during the first trimester had lower-birth-weight babies compared to those who started during their second or third trimesters.270

Smokeless Tobacco

Smokeless tobacco is tobacco consumed orally, not smoked. The main types of smokeless tobacco in Western countries are chewing tobacco, mostly used in the U.S., and oral snuff, mostly used in Sweden. In developing countries, tobacco is mostly chewed with other ingredients.271 Most reviews conclude that smokeless tobacco use has substantial negative health implications, including oral leukoplakias, gingival recession, cancer, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, peptic ulcers, and increased rates of fetal morbidity and mortality.272

Despite the myriad adverse health consequences, smokeless tobacco use among women is still widespread. Data from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in the U.S. show that 50% of Alaska Native women use chewing tobacco.273,274 A cohort study in South Africa reported that 7.5% of women reported using snuff during pregnancy.275 Another study of 1217 pregnant women in eight selected areas in Mumbai, India, revealed that 16.9% reported using smokeless tobacco.276

In South Africa, another study among a cohort of 1593 pregnant women found that snuff users had a significantly shorter gestational length compared to both cigarette smokers and nonsmokers, although no significant differences in infant birth weight were observed.275 In Sweden, a study examining birth weight, preterm delivery, and preeclampsia in snuff users, cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers found that compared with nonusers, adjusted mean birth weight was reduced in snuff users by 39 g and in cigarette smokers by 190 g. Not surprisingly, preterm delivery was increased among both snuff users and smokers, and while preeclampsia was reduced among smokers, it was increased among snuff users.277 In Mumbai, India, it was shown that smokeless tobacco use was associated with an average reduction of 105 g in birth weight and a reduction in gestational age of 6.2 days with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.4 for preterm delivery (<37 weeks).276 Also in Mumbai, India, the incidence of stillbirth was significantly higher among smokeless tobacco users than nonusers with an adjusted proportional hazard ratio of 2.6 in a cohort of 1217 pregnant women.278 In Jabalpur, India, a study of 70 pregnant smokeless tobacco users found that infants of smokeless tobacco users had a significant reduction in birth weight (395 g) and height (0.5 cm) compared to infants born to nonusers.279 In Pakistan, snuff users were found to have evidence of degenerative placental changes, such as a higher number of chorionic villi with excessive collagen compared with nonusers.280

There is no available study to date on the effects of cigars, cigarillos, bidis, or kreteks on pregnancy outcomes. Nor is there study on the long-term neuro-behaviroal outcomes of prenatal SHS exposure to any alternative tobacco product. Therefore, the SHS effect of alternative tobacco products is a markedly under-studied public health threat. More information is urgently needed to inform health care providers and women about the risks of using alternative tobacco products during pregnancy.

Conclusion

Extensive research documents the numerous health-related consequences to children exposed to tobacco prenatally or to SHS postnatally despite the fact that only a small percentage of the harmful chemicals in SHS have been studied. The rapidly growing body of evidence concerning the aftermath of prenatal tobacco and childhood SHS exposure is compelling from the molecular level to the adverse outcomes in childhood that persist into and throughout adult life.

Abbreviations:

ADHD

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

DNA

deoxyribonucleic acid

ETS

environmental tobacco smoke

5-HT

5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)

IQ

intelligence quotient

PAH

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

SHS

secondhand smoke

SIDS

sudden infant death syndrome

TSNA

tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines

References

  • 1.Guindon G Emmanuel, Boisclair D Past, Current and Future Trends in Tobacco Use. Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 2003. p. 13–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011: Warning about the dangers of tobacco. World Health Organization; 2011; ISBN 978 92 4 156426 7. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Proctor RN. The Nazi War on Cancer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doll R, Hill AB. Smoking and carcinoma of the lung; preliminary report. Br Med J 1950;2(4682):739–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon General: Public Health Service Publication; 1964. 1103. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Campos M, Bravo E, Eugenn J. Respiratory dysfunctions induced by prenatal nicotine exposure. Clin Exp Pharmacol 2009;36(12):1205–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.El-Mohandes AAE, Kiely M, Blake S, Gantz M, El-Khorazaty MN. An intervention to reduce environmental tobacco smoke exposure improves pregnancy outcomes. Pediatrics 2010;125(4):721–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Prabhu N, Smith N, Campbell D, et al. First trimester maternal tobacco smoking habits and fetal growth. Thorax 2010;65(3):235–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cuthbertson L, Britton J. Passive smoking and children’s health. Clin Med 2010;10(2):113–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Herrmann M, King K, Weitzman M. Prenatal tobacco smoke and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure and child neurodevelopment. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008;20(2): 184–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2004;83:1–1438. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Report of Carcinogens. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA; 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.DiFranza Aligne CA, Weitzman M. Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children’s health. Pediatrics 2004;113(4):1007–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luepker RV, Pechacek TF, Murray DM, Johnson CA, Hund F, Jacobs DR. Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. Am J Public Health 1981; 71(12):1320–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 1994;84(7):1086–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maritz G Nicotine and lung development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2008;84(1):45–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matta S, Balfour D, Benowitz N, et al. Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research. Psychopharmacology 2007;190(3):269–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rylander E, Pershagen G, Eriksson M, Bermann G. Parental smoking, urinary cotinine, and wheezing bronchitis in children. Epidemiology 1995;6(3):289–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ostrea EM, Knapp DK, Romero A, Montes M, Ostrea AR. Meconium analysis to assess fetal exposure to nicotine by active and passive maternal smoking. J Pediatr 1994;124(3): 471–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luck W, Nau H. Nicotine and cotinine concentrations in serum and urine of infants exposed via passive smoking or milk from smoking mothers. J Pediatr 1985;107(5):816–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yue B, Kushnir MM, Urry FM, Rockwood AL. Quantitation of nicotine, its metabolites, and other related alkaloids in urine, serum, and plasma using LC-MS-MS. Methods Mol Biol 2010;603:389–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sleiman M, Gundel LA, Pankow JF, Jacob P 3rd, Singer BC, Destaillats H. Formation of carcinogens indoors by surface-mediated reactions of nicotine with nitrous acid, leading to potential thirdhand smoke hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107(15):6576–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rehan VK, Sakurai R, Torday JS. Thirdhand smoke: a new dimension to the effects of cigarette smoke on the developing lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2011;301(1):L1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Matt GE, Quintana PJ, Zakarian JM, et al. When smokers move out and non-smokers move in: residential thirdhand smoke pollution and exposure. Tob Control 2011;20(1):e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Office on Smoking Health. Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dreyfuss JH. Thirdhand smoke identified as potent, enduring carcinogen. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60(4):203–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Joad JP. Smoking and pediatric respiratory health. Clin Chest Med 2000;21(1):37–46 [vii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cook DG, Strachan DP. Health effects of passive smoking. 3. Parental smoking and prevalence of respiratory symptoms and asthma in school age children. Thorax 1997;52(12): 1081–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gergen PJ, Fowler JA, Maurer KR, Davis WW, Overpeck MD. The burden of environmental tobacco smoke exposure on the respiratory health of children 2 months through 5 years of age in the United States: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1994. Pediatrics 1998;101(2):[E8]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Frischer T, Kuehr J, Meinert R, et al. Maternal smoking in early childhood: a risk factor for bronchial responsiveness to exercise in primary-school children. J Pediatr 1992;121 (1):17–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Boyaci H, Etiler N, Duman C, Basyigit I, Pala A. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in school children: parent report and urine cotinine measures. Pediatr Int 2006;48(4): 382–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bush PG, Mayhew TM, Abramovich DR, Aggett PJ, Burke MD, Page KR. Maternal cigarette smoking and oxygen diffusion across the placenta. Placenta 2000;21(8):824–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Albuquerque C, Smith K, Johnson C, Chao R, Harding R. Influence of maternal tobacco smoking during pregnancy on uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral artery blood flows. Early Hum Dev 2004;80(1):31–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eppolito A, Bachus S, McDonald C, Meador Woodruff J, Smith R. Late emerging effects of prenatal and early postnatal nicotine exposure on the cholinergic system and anxiety-like behavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2010;32(3):336–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Howard RB, Hosokawa T, Maguire MH. Hypoxia-induced fetoplacental vasoconstriction in perfused human placental cotyledons. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157(5):1261–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang L, Liu X, Griffith W, Winzer Serhan U. Chronic neonatal nicotine increases anxiety but does not impair cognition in adult rats. Behav Neurosci 2007;121(6): 1342–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kalinka J, Hanke W, Sobala W. Impact of prenatal tobacco smoke exposure, as measured by midgestation serum cotinine levels, on fetal biometry and umbilical flow velocity wave-forms. Am J Perinatol 2005;22(1):41–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nicol CJ, Harrison ML, Laposa RR, Gimelshtein IL, Wells PG. A teratologic suppressor role for p53 in benzo[a]pyrene-treated transgenic p53-deficient mice. Nat Genet 1995;10 (2):181–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Slotkin TA, Orband Miller L, Queen KL. Development of [3H]nicotine binding sites in brain regions of rats exposed to nicotine prenatally via maternal injections or infusions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987;242(1):232–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Slotkin T, Seidler F. Mimicking maternal smoking and pharmacotherapy of preterm labor: interactions of fetal nicotine and dexamethasone on serotonin and dopamine synaptic function in adolescence and adulthood. Brain Res Bull 2010;82(1–2):124–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Slotkin T, MacKillop E, Rudder C, Ryde I, Tate C, Seidler F. Permanent, sex-selective effects of prenatal or adolescent nicotine exposure, separately or sequentially, in rat brain regions: indices of cholinergic and serotonergic synaptic function, cell signaling, and neural cell number and size at 6 months of age. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007;32(5): 1082–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aldridge J, Levin E, Seidler F, Slotkin T. Developmental exposure of rats to chlorpyrifos leads to behavioral alterations in adulthood, involving serotonergic mechanisms and resembling animal models of depression. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113(5):527–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Slotkin T, Seidler F, Qiao D, et al. Effects of prenatal nicotine exposure on primate brain development and attempted amelioration with supplemental choline or vitamin C: neuro-transmitter receptors, cell signaling and cell development biomarkers in fetal brain regions of rhesus monkeys. Neuro-psychopharmacology 2005;30(1):129–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Steingart RA, Abu-Roumi M, Newman ME, Silverman WF, Slotkin TA, Yanai J. Neurobehavioral damage to cholinergic systems caused by prenatal exposure to heroin or phenobarbital: cellular mechanisms and the reversal of deficits by neural grafts. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2000;122(2):125–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vatury O, Barg J, Slotkin T, Yanai J. Altered localization of choline transporter sites in the mouse hippocampus after prenatal heroin exposure. Brain Res Bull 2004;63(1): 25–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yanai J, Pick CG, Rogel Fuchs Y, Zahalka EA. Alterations in hippocampal cholinergic receptors and hippocampal behaviors after early exposure to nicotine. Brain Res Bull 1992;29 (3–4):363–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mao C, Yuan X, Zhang H, et al. The effect of prenatal nicotine on mRNA of central cholinergic markers and hematological parameters in rat fetuses. Int J Dev Neurosci 2008;26(5):467–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gold AB, Keller AB, Perry DC. Prenatal exposure of rats to nicotine causes persistent alterations of nicotinic cholinergic receptors. Brain Res 2009;1250:88–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thomas JD, Garrison ME, Slawecki CJ, Ehlers CL, Riley EP. Nicotine exposure during the neonatal brain growth spurt produces hyperactivity in preweanling rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2000;22(5):695–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lv J, Mao C, Zhu L, et al. The effect of prenatal nicotine on expression of nicotine receptor subunits in the fetal brain. Neurotoxicology 2008;29(4):722–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tizabi Y, Perry DC. Prenatal nicotine exposure is associated with an increase in [125I]epibatidine binding in discrete cortical regions in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000; 67(2):319–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Navarro HA, Mills E, Seidler FJ, et al. Prenatal nicotine exposure impairs beta-adrenergic function: persistent chronotropic subsensitivity despite recovery from deficits in receptor binding. Brain Res Bull 1990;25(2):233–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sobrian SK, Ali SF, Slikker W, Holson RR. Interactive effects of prenatal cocaine and nicotine exposure on maternal toxicity, postnatal development and behavior in the rat. Mol Neurobiol 1995;11(1–3):121–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Feng Y, Caiping M, Li C, et al. Fetal and offspring arrhythmia following exposure to nicotine during pregnancy. J Appl Toxicol 2010;30(1):53–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fu X, Lindstrom J, Spindel E. Nicotine activates and up-regulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2009;41(1): 93–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lanner E, Wickman M, van Hage M, Bergstrm A, Pershagen G, Nordvall L. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and sensitisation in children. Thorax 2008;63(2):172–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wipfli H, Avila-Tang E, Navas-Acien A, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries. Am J Public Health 2008;98(4):672–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bassi JA, Rosso P, Moessinger AC, Blanc WA, James LS. Fetal growth retardation due to maternal tobacco smoke exposure in the rat. Pediatr Res 1984;18(2):127–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fleming P, Blair P. Sudden infant death syndrome and parental smoking. Early Hum Dev 2007;83(11):721–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang K, Wang X. Maternal smoking and increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome: a meta-analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2013;15(3):115–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Alm B, Milerad J, Wennergren G, et al. A case–control study of smoking and sudden infant death syndrome in the Scandinavian countries, 1992 to 1995. The Nordic Epidemiological SIDS study. Arch Dis Child 1998;78(4):329–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cohen G, Roux JC, Grailhe R, Malcolm G, Changeux JP, Lagercrantz H. Perinatal exposure to nicotine causes deficits associated with a loss of nicotinic receptor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102(10):3817–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kinney H, Myers M, Belliveau R, et al. Subtle autonomic and respiratory dysfunction in sudden infant death syndrome associated with serotonergic brainstem abnormalities: a case report. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2005;64(8):689–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kinney H Brainstem mechanisms underlying the sudden infant death syndrome: evidence from human pathologic studies. Dev Psychobiol 2009;51(3):223–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Machaalani R, Say M, Waters KA. Effects of cigarette smoke exposure on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits alpha7 and beta2 in the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) brainstem. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2011;257(3):396–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Slotkin T, Seidler F, Spindel E. Prenatal nicotine exposure in rhesus monkeys compromises development of brainstem and cardiac monoamine pathways involved in perinatal adaptation and sudden infant death syndrome: amelioration by vitamin C. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011;33(3):431–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dejmek J, Solansky I, Podrazilov K, Srm R. The exposure of nonsmoking and smoking mothers to environmental tobacco smoke during different gestational phases and fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110(6):601–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 1987;65(5):663–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hegaard H, Kjaergaard H, Mller L, Wachmann H, Ottesen B. The effect of environmental tobacco smoke during pregnancy on birth weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85(6): 675–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Eskenazi B, Castorina R. Association of prenatal maternal or postnatal child environmental tobacco smoke exposure and neurodevelopmental and behavioral problems in children. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107(12):991–1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ward. Prevalence of maternal smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy and impact on birth weight: retrospective study using Millennium Cohort. BMC Public Health 2007;7:81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Matsubara F, Kida M, Tamakoshi A, Wakai K, Kawamura T, Ohno Y. Maternal active and passive smoking and fetal growth: a prospective study in Nagoya, Japan. J Epidemiol 2000;10(5):335–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sexton M, Hebel JR. A clinical trial of change in maternal smoking and its effect on birth weight. J Am Med Assoc 1984;251(7):911–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Vardavas C, Chatzi L, Patelarou E, et al. Smoking and smoking cessation during early pregnancy and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes and fetal growth. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169(6):741–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dietz PM, England LJ, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Tong VT, Farr SL, Callaghan WM. Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2010;39 (1):45–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.McCarton C Behavioral outcomes in low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1998;102(5 suppl E):1293–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Breslau N, Chilcoat HD, Johnson EO, Andreski P, Lucia VC. Neurologic soft signs and low birthweight: their association and neuropsychiatric implications. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47 (1):71–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Johnson EO, Breslau N. Increased risk of learning disabilities in low birth weight boys at age 11 years. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47(6):490–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jordaan HV, Sattar FA, Shah P, Makarachi A. Simplified method of determining fetal brain weight in utero. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55(6):673–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cooke RW, Lucas A, Yudkin PL, Pryse Davies J. Head circumference as an index of brain weight in the fetus and newborn. Early Hum Dev 1977;1(2):145–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Roza S, Verburg B, Jaddoe VWV, et al. Effects of maternal smoking in pregnancy on prenatal brain development. The Generation R Study. Eur J Neurosci 2007;25(3):611–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jaddoe VWV, Verburg B, de Ridder MAJ, et al. Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy: the generation R study. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165(10):1207–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gale CR, Walton S, Martyn CN. Foetal and postnatal head growth and risk of cognitive decline in old age. Brain 2003;126(Pt 10):2273–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lange N, Froimowitz M, Bigler E, Lainhart J. Associations between IQ, total and regional brain volumes, and demography in a large normative sample of healthy children and adolescents. Dev Neuropsychol 2010;35(3):296–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gale C, O’Callaghan F, Bredow M, Martyn C. The influence of head growth in fetal life, infancy, and childhood on intelligence at the ages of 4 and 8 years. Pediatrics 2006;118(4):1486–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Vik T, Jacobsen G, Vatten L, Bakketeig LS. Pre- and postnatal growth in children of women who smoked in pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 1996;45(3):245–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rivkin M, Davis P, Lemaster J, et al. Volumetric MRI study of brain in children with intrauterine exposure to cocaine, alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana. Pediatrics 2008;121(4):741–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jacobsen L, Picciotto M, Heath C, et al. Prenatal and adolescent exposure to tobacco smoke modulates the development of white matter microstructure. J Neurosci 2007;27 (49):13491–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ekblad M, Korkeila J, Parkkola R, Lapinleimu H, Haataja L, Lehtonen L. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and regional brain volumes in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2010;156(2):185–90:[e181]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ilicali OC, Keleş N, De er K, Sa un OF, Gldken Y. Evaluation of the effect of passive smoking on otitis media in children by an objective method: urinary cotinine analysis. Laryngoscope 2001;111(1):163–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Tos M, Stangerup SE, Holm Jensen S, Srensen CH. Spontaneous course of secretory otitis and changes of the eardrum. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110(5):281–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Strachan DP, Cook DG. Health effects of passive smoking. 4. Parental smoking, middle ear disease and adenotonsillectomy in children. Thorax 1998;53(1):50–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Jones LL, Hashim A, McKeever T, Cook DG, Britton J, Leonardi-Bee J. Parental and household smoking and the increased risk of bronchitis, bronchiolitis and other lower respiratory infections in infancy: systematic review and metaanalysis. Respir Res 2011;12:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics 2004;113(5):1451–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hendley JO. Clinical practice. Otitis media. N Engl J Med 2002;347(15):1169–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ramakrishnan K, Sparks RA, Berryhill WE. Diagnosis and treatment of otitis media. Am Fam Physician 2007;76(11): 1650–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Li JS, Peat JK, Xuan W, Berry G. Meta-analysis on the association between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and the prevalence of lower respiratory tract infection in early childhood. Pediatr Pulmonol 1999;27 (1):5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Carlsen KH, Carlsen KC. Respiratory effects of tobacco smoking on infants and young children. Paediatr Respir Rev 2008;9(1):11–9:[quiz 19–20]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Stocks J, Dezateux C. The effect of parental smoking on lung function and development during infancy. Respirology 2003;8(3):266–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Treyster Z, Gitterman B. Second hand smoke exposure in children: environmental factors, physiological effects, and interventions within pediatrics. Rev Environ Health 2011; 26(3):187–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Carlsen K-H, Carlsen KCL. Respiratory effects of tobacco smoking on infants and young children. Paediatr Respir Rev 2008;9(1):11–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Cook DG, Strachan DP, Carey IM. Health effects of passive smoking. 9. Parental smoking and spirometric indices in children. Thorax 1998;53(10):884–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.DiFranza JR, Lew RA. Morbidity and mortality in children associated with the use of tobacco products by other people. Pediatrics 1996;97(4):560–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gilliland FD, Li YF, Peters JM. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy and environmental tobacco smoke on asthma and wheezing in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163(2):429–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Strachan DP, Cook DG. Health effects of passive smoking. 6. Parental smoking and childhood asthma: longitudinal and case–control studies. Thorax 1998;53(3):204–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Martinez FD, Cline M, Burrows B. Increased incidence of asthma in children of smoking mothers. Pediatrics 1992; 89(1):21–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Weitzman M, Gortmaker S, Walker DK, Sobol A. Maternal smoking and childhood asthma. Pediatrics 1990;85(4): 505–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Burke H, Leonardi-Bee J, Hashim A, et al. Prenatal and passive smoke exposure and incidence of asthma and wheeze: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2012;129 (4):735–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Strachan DP, Carey IM. Home environment and severe asthma in adolescence: a population based case–control study. Br Med J 1995;311(7012):1053–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Crombie IK, Wright A, Irvine L, Clark RA, Slane PW. Does passive smoking increase the frequency of health service contacts in children with asthma? Thorax 2001;56(1):9–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.LeSon S, Gershwin ME. Risk factors for asthmatic patients requiring intubation. I. Observations in children. J Asthma 1995;32(4):285–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Landau LI. Parental smoking: asthma and wheezing illnesses in infants and children. Paediatr Respir Rev 2001;2(3): 202–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Csonka P, Kaila M, Laippala P, Kuusela AL, Ashorn P. Wheezing in early life and asthma at school age: predictors of symptom persistence. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2000;11 (4):225–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Floreani AA, Rennard SI. The role of cigarette smoke in the pathogenesis of asthma and as a trigger for acute symptoms. Curr Opin Pulm Med 1999;5(1):38–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hanrahan JP, Halonen M. Antenatal interventions in childhood asthma. Eur Respir J Suppl 1998;27:46s–51s. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hu FB, Persky V, Flay BR, Zelli A, Cooksey J, Richardson J. Prevalence of asthma and wheezing in public schoolchildren: association with maternal smoking during pregnancy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;79(1):80–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lannero E, Kull I, Wickman M, Pershagen G, Nordvall SL. Environmental risk factors for allergy and socioeconomic status in a birth cohort (BAMSE). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2002;13(3):182–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Young S, Sherrill DL, Arnott J, Diepeveen D, LeSouef PN, Landau LI. Parental factors affecting respiratory function during the first year of life. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000;29 (5):331–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Li YF, Langholz B, Salam MT, Gilliland FD. Maternal and grandmaternal smoking patterns are associated with early childhood asthma. Chest 2005;127(4):1232–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Rehan VK, Liu J, Sakurai R, Torday JS. Perinatal nicotine-induced transgenerational asthma. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2013;305(7):L501–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Carroll KN, Gebretsadik T, Griffin MR, et al. Maternal asthma and maternal smoking are associated with increased risk of bronchiolitis during infancy. Pediatrics 2007;119 (6):1104–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Cook DG, Strachan DP. Health effects of passive smoking-10: summary of effects of parental smoking on the respiratory health of children and implications for research. Thorax 1999;54(4):357–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Duijts L, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, et al. Maternal smoking in prenatal and early postnatal life and the risk of respiratory tract infections in infancy. The Generation R study. Eur J Epidemiol 2008;23(8):547–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Jaakkola JJ, Kosheleva AA, Katsnelson BA, Kuzmin SV, Privalova LI, Spengler JD. Prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health in Russian children. Respir Res 2006;7:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Taylor B, Wadsworth J. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and lower respiratory tract illness in early life. Arch Dis Child 1987;62(8):786–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Lee CC, Middaugh NA, Howie SR, Ezzati M. Association of secondhand smoke exposure with pediatric invasive bacterial disease and bacterial carriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2010;7(12):e1000374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Altet MN, Alcaide J, Plans P, et al. Passive smoking and risk of pulmonary tuberculosis in children immediately following infection. A case–control study. Tuberc Lung Dis 1996;77 (6):537–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.den Boon S, Verver S, Marais BJ, et al. Association between passive smoking and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children. Pediatrics 2007;119(4):734–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.DiFranza JR, Aligne CA, Weitzman M. Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and children’s health. Pediatrics 2004;113(4 suppl):1007–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Haberg SE, Stigum H, Nystad W, Nafstad P. Effects of pre- and postnatal exposure to parental smoking on early childhood respiratory health. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166(6): 679–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Yusuf HR, Rochat RW, Baughman WS, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking and invasive meningococcal disease: a cohort study among young children in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–1996. Am J Public Health 1999;89(5):712–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fischer M, Hedberg K, Cardosi P, et al. Tobacco smoke as a risk factor for meningococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16(10):979–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Murray RL, Britton J, Leonardi-Bee J. Second hand smoke exposure and the risk of invasive meningococcal disease in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2012;12:1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Stuart RL, Tan K, Mahar JE, et al. An outbreak of necrotizing enterocolitis associated with norovirus genotype GII.3. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29(7):644–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Brocklehurst P, French R. The association between maternal HIV infection and perinatal outcome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105(8):836–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Turner BJ, Hauck WW, Fanning TR, Markson LE. Cigarette smoking and maternal-child HIV transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1997;14(4):327–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Metzger MJ, Halperin AC, Manhart LE, Hawes SE. Association of maternal smoking during pregnancy with infant hospitalization and mortality due to infectious diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013;32(1):e1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Gregory A, Doull I, Pearce N, et al. The relationship between anthropometric measurements at birth: asthma and atopy in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29(3):330–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Leadbitter P, Pearce N, Cheng S, et al. Relationship between fetal growth and the development of asthma and atopy in childhood. Thorax 1999;54(10):905–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Rasanen M, Kaprio J, Laitinen T, Winter T, Koskenvuo M, Laitinen LA. Perinatal risk factors for asthma in Finnish adolescent twins. Thorax 2000;55(1):25–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Macaubas C, de Klerk NH, Holt BJ, et al. Association between antenatal cytokine production and the development of atopy and asthma at age 6 years. Lancet 2003;362 (9391):1192–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Hofhuis W, de Jongste JC, Merkus PJ. Adverse health effects of prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure on children. Arch Dis Child 2003;88(12):1086–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Suter M, Abramovici A, Aagaard-Tillery K. Genetic and epigenetic influences associated with intrauterine growth restriction due to in utero tobacco exposure. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2010;8(2):94–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Wilhelm-Benartzi CS, Houseman EA, Maccani MA, et al. In utero exposures, infant growth, and DNA methylation of repetitive elements and developmentally related genes in human placenta. Environ Health Perspect 2012;120 (2):296–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Voigt M, Briese V, Jorch G, Henrich W, Schneider KT, Straube S. The influence of smoking during pregnancy on fetal growth. Considering daily cigarette consumption and the SGA rate according to length of gestation. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2009;213(5):194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Tommasi S, Zheng A, Yoon JI, Li AX, Wu X, Besaratinia A. Whole DNA methylome profiling in mice exposed to secondhand smoke. Epigenetics 2012;7(11):1302–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Suter M, Ma J, Harris A, et al. Maternal tobacco use modestly alters correlated epigenome-wide placental DNA methylation and gene expression. Epigenetics 2011;6(11):1284–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Guerrero-Preston R, Goldman LR, Brebi-Mieville P, et al. Global DNA hypomethylation is associated with in utero exposure to cotinine and perfluorinated alkyl compounds. Epigenetics 2010;5(6):539–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Terry MB, Ferris JS, Pilsner R, et al. Genomic DNA methylation among women in a multiethnic New York City birth cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17 (9):2306–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001;24: 677–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Fuchikami M, Morinobu S, Segawa M, et al. DNA methylation profiles of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene as a potent diagnostic biomarker in major depression. PLoS One 2011;6(8):e23881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Calabrese F, Molteni R, Racagni G, Riva MA. Neuronal plasticity: a link between stress and mood disorders. Psycho-neuroendocrinology 2009;34(suppl 1):S208–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Toledo-Rodriguez M, Lotfipour S, Leonard G, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with epigenetic modifications of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor-6 exon in adolescent offspring. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2010;153b(7):1350–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Boffetta P, Tredaniel J, Greco A. Risk of childhood cancer and adult lung cancer after childhood exposure to passive smoke: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108 (1):73–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Fabry D, Davila E, Arheart K, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure and the risk of hearing loss. Tob Control 2011; 20(1):82–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Agrawal Y, Platz E, Niparko J. Risk factors for hearing loss in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2002. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30(2):139–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS. Cigarette smoking and hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. J Am Med Assoc 1998;279(21):1715–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Lalwani A, Liu Y-H, Weitzman M. Secondhand smoke and sensorineural hearing loss in adolescents. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137(7):655–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Fried PA, O’Connell CM, Watkinson B. 60- and 72-month follow-up of children prenatally exposed to marijuana, cigarettes, and alcohol: cognitive and language assessment. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1992;13(6):383–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Fried PA, Watkinson B. 12- and 24-month neurobehavioural follow-up of children prenatally exposed to marihuana, cigarettes and alcohol. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1988;10(4): 305–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Fried PA, Watkinson B. 36- and 48-month neurobehavioral follow-up of children prenatally exposed to marijuana, cigarettes, and alcohol. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1990;11(2): 49–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Fried PA, Makin JE. Neonatal behavioural correlates of prenatal exposure to marihuana, cigarettes and alcohol in a low risk population. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1987;9(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Fried PA, Watkinson B, Siegel LS. Reading and language in 9- to 12-year olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marijuana. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997;19(3):171–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Roizen N Nongenetic causes of hearing loss. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2003;9(2):120–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Bush PG, Mayhew TM, Abramovich DR, Aggett PJ, Burke MD, Page KR. A quantitative study on the effects of maternal smoking on placental morphology and cadmium concentration. Placenta 2000;21(2–3):247–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Larsen L, Clausen H, Jnsson L. Stereologic examination of placentas from mothers who smoke during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(3):531–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Weitzman M, Govil N, Liu YH, Lalwani AK. Maternal prenatal smoking and hearing loss among adolescents. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139(7):669–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Aligne CA, Moss M, Auinger P, Weitzman M. Association of pediatric dental caries with passive smoking. J Am Med Assoc 2003;289(10):1258–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Hanioka T, Ojima M, Tanaka K, Yamamoto M. Does secondhand smoke affect the development of dental caries in children? A systematic review Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011;8(5):1503–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Billings R, Berkowitz R, Watson G. Teeth. Pediatrics 2004;113(4 suppl):1120–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Chowdhury IG, Bromage TG. Effects of fetal exposure to nicotine on dental development of the laboratory rat. Anat Rec 2000;258(4):397–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Heikkinen T, Alvesalo L, Osborne RH, Tienari J. Maternal smoking and tooth formation in the foetus. III. Thin mandibular incisors and delayed motor development at 1 year of age. Early Hum Dev 1997;47(3):327–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Avşar A, Darka O, Topaloğlu B, Bek Y. Association of passive smoking with caries and related salivary biomarkers in young children. Arch Oral Biol 2008;53(10):969–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Strauss RS. Environmental tobacco smoke and serum vitamin C levels in children. Pediatrics 2001;107(3):540–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kum Nji P, Meloy L, Herrod H. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure: prevalence and mechanisms of causation of infections in children. Pediatrics 2006;117(5):1745–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Ford E, Giles W, Dietz W. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Med Assoc 2002;287(3):356–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Weitzman M, Cook S, Auinger P, et al. Tobacco smoke exposure is associated with the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Circulation 2005;112(6):862–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Oken E, Levitan EB, Gillman MW. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and child overweight: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32(2):201–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Raum E, Kpper-Nybelen J, Lamerz A, Hebebrand J, Herpertz Dahlmann B, Brenner H. Tobacco smoke exposure before, during, and after pregnancy and risk of overweight at age 6. Obesity 2011;19(12):2411–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Wells JCK. The thrifty phenotype as an adaptive maternal effect. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2007;82(1):143–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Ong KK, Ahmed ML, Emmett PM, Preece MA, Dunger DB. Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 2000;320 (7240):967–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Levin E Fetal nicotinic overload, blunted sympathetic responsivity, and obesity. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005;73(7):481–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Ludvigsson J Socio-economic determinants, maternal smoking and coffee consumption, and exclusive breastfeeding in 10205 children. Acta Paediatr 2005;94(9):1310–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Scott J, Binns C, Oddy W, Graham K. Predictors of breastfeeding duration: evidence from a cohort study. Pediatrics 2006;117(4):e646–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Dallongeville J, Marcaux N, Fruchart JC, Amouyel P. Cigarette smoking is associated with unhealthy patterns of nutrient intake: a meta-analysis. J Nutr 1998;128(9):1450–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Cutler Triggs C, Fryer G, Miyoshi T, Weitzman M. Increased rates and severity of child and adult food insecurity in households with adult smokers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162(11):1056–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Slotkin T, Pinkerton K, Seidler F. Perinatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure in rhesus monkeys: critical periods and regional selectivity for effects on brain cell development and lipid peroxidation. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114 (1):34–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Wessler I, Kirkpatrick CJ, Rack K. Non-neuronal acetylcholine, a locally acting molecule, widely distributed in biological systems: expression and function in humans. Pharmacol Ther 1998;77(1):59–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Oken E, Huh S, Taveras E, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman M. Associations of maternal prenatal smoking with child adiposity and blood pressure. Obes Res 2005;13(11):2021–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Patten CA, Choi WS, Gillin JC, Pierce JP. Depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking predict development and persistence of sleep problems in US adolescents. Pediatrics 2000;106(2):[E23]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Salsberry P, Reagan P. Dynamics of early childhood overweight. Pediatrics 2005;116(6):1329–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Toschke AM, Ehlin AGC, von Kries R, Ekbom A, Montgomery S. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and appetite control in offspring. J Perinat Med 2003;31(3):251–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Upadhyaya H, Deas D, Brady K, Kruesi M. Cigarette smoking and psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002;41 (11):1294–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Wu LT, Anthony JC. Tobacco smoking and depressed mood in late childhood and early adolescence. Am J Public Health 1999;89(12):1837–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Slotkin TA, Greer N, Faust J, Cho H, Seidler FJ. Effects of maternal nicotine injections on brain development in the rat: ornithine decarboxylase activity, nucleic acids and proteins in discrete brain regions. Brain Res Bull 1986;17(1):41–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.McFarland BJ, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in neonatal rat brain regions caused by acute nicotine administration. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1991;58 (2):223–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Peters MA, Ngan LL. The effects of totigestational exposure to nicotine on pre- and postnatal development in the rat. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 1982;257(1):155–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Richardson SA, Tizabi Y. Hyperactivity in the offspring of nicotine-treated rats: role of the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1994;47 (2):331–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Slotkin TA, Pinkerton KE, Auman JT, Qiao D, Seidler FJ. Perinatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke upregulates nicotinic cholinergic receptors in monkey brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2002;133(2):175–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Twardella D, Bolte G, Fromme H, Wildner M, von Kries R. Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and child behaviour —results from a cross-sectional study among preschool children in Bavaria. Acta Paediatr 2010;99(1):106–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Gatzke Kopp L, Beauchaine T. Direct and passive prenatal nicotine exposure and the development of externalizing psychopathology. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2007;38 (4):255–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Reijneveld SA, Brugman E, Hirasing RA. Excessive infant crying: definitions determine risk groups. Arch Dis Child 2002;87(1):43–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Stene-Larsen K, Borge AIH, Vollrath M. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and externalizing behavior in 18-month-old children: results from a population-based prospective study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009;48(3):283–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Kahn R, Zuckerman B, Bauchner H, Homer C, Wise P. Women’s health after pregnancy and child outcomes at age 3 years: a prospective cohort study. Am J Public Health 2002;92(8):1312–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Day NL, Richardson GA, Goldschmidt L, Cornelius MD. Effects of prenatal tobacco exposure on preschoolers’ behavior. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2000;21(3):180–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Williams GM, O’Callaghan M, Najman JM, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking and child psychiatric morbidity: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics 1998;102(1):[E11]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey MT. Maternal smoking before and after pregnancy: effects on behavioral outcomes in middle childhood. Pediatrics 1993;92(6):815–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Hardy JME. Does maternal smoking during pregnancy have a long-term effect on the child? Lancet 1972;2:1322–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Milberger S, Biederman J, Faraone SV, Chen L, Jones J. Is maternal smoking during pregnancy a risk factor for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children? Am J Psychiatry 1996;153(9):1138–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Naeye RL, Peters EC. Mental development of children whose mothers smoked during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64 (5):601–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Rantakallio P, Laara E, Isohanni M, Moilanen I. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and delinquency of the offspring: an association without causation? Int J Epidemiol 1992;21 (6):1106–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Wakschlag LS, Lahey BB, Loeber R, Green SM, Gordon RA, Leventhal BL. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of conduct disorder in boys. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54(7):670–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Indredavik M, Brubakk A-M, Romundstad P, Vik T. Prenatal smoking exposure and psychiatric symptoms in adolescence. Acta Paediatr 2007;96(3):377–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Weitzman M, Gortmaker S, Sobol A. Maternal smoking and behavior problems of children. Pediatrics 1992;90(3):342–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Rckinger S, Rzehak P, Chen C-M, et al. Prenatal and postnatal tobacco exposure and behavioral problems in 10- year-old children: results from the GINI-plus prospective birth cohort study. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118 (1):150–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Boutwell B, Beaver K. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and offspring externalizing behavioral problems: a propensity score matching analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7(1):146–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Weitzman M, Byrd R, Aligne CA, Moss M. The effects of tobacco exposure on children’s behavioral and cognitive functioning: implications for clinical and public health policy and future research. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2002;24 (3):397–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Button TM, Thapar A, McGuffin P. Relationship between antisocial behaviour, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and maternal prenatal smoking. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187:155–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Nigg JT, Breslau N. Prenatal smoking exposure, low birth weight, and disruptive behavior disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;46(3):362–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Wakschlag L, Pickett K, Kasza K, Loeber R. Is prenatal smoking associated with a developmental pattern of conduct problems in young boys? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45(4):461–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Maughan B, Taylor A, Caspi A, Moffitt T. Prenatal smoking and early childhood conduct problems: testing genetic and environmental explanations of the association. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61(8):836–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Denson R, Nanson JL, McWatters MA. Hyperkinesis and maternal smoking. Can Psychiatr Assoc J 1975;20(3):183–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Linnet K, Dalsgaard S, Obel C, et al. Maternal lifestyle factors in pregnancy risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and associated behaviors: review of the current evidence. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(6):1028–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Schmitz M, Denardin D, Laufer Silva T, et al. Smoking during pregnancy and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type: a case–control study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45(11):1338–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Langley K, Holmans PA, van den Bree MB, Thapar A. Effects of low birth weight, maternal smoking in pregnancy and social class on the phenotypic manifestation of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and associated antisocial behaviour: investigation in a clinical sample. BMC Psychiatry 2007;7:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Kotimaa A, Moilanen I, Taanila A, et al. Maternal smoking and hyperactivity in 8-year-old children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003;42(7):826–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Knopik V, Heath A, Jacob T, et al. Maternal alcohol use disorder and offspring ADHD: disentangling genetic and environmental effects using a children-of-twins design. Psychol Med 2006;36(10):1461–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Thapar A, Fowler T, Rice F, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in offspring. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(11):1985–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Braun J, Kahn R, Froehlich T, Auinger P, Lanphear B. Exposures to environmental toxicants and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in U.S. children. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114(12):1904–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Froehlich T, Lanphear B, Auinger P, et al. Association of tobacco and lead exposures with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 2009;124(6):e1054–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Becker K, El Faddagh M, Schmidt M, Esser G, Laucht M. Interaction of dopamine transporter genotype with prenatal smoke exposure on ADHD symptoms. J Pediatr 2008;152 (2):263–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Kahn R, Khoury J, Nichols W, Lanphear B. Role of dopamine transporter genotype and maternal prenatal smoking in childhood hyperactive-impulsive, inattentive, and oppositional behaviors. J Pediatr 2003;143(1):104–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Neuman R, Lobos E, Reich W, Henderson C, Sun L-W, Todd R. Prenatal smoking exposure and dopaminergic genotypes interact to cause a severe ADHD subtype. Biol Psychiatry 2007;61(12):1320–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Altink M, Arias-Vsquez A, Franke B, et al. The dopamine receptor D4 7-repeat allele and prenatal smoking in ADHD-affected children and their unaffected siblings: no gene-environment interaction. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008; 49(10):1053–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Becker K, El-Faddagh M, Schmidt M, Esser G, Laucht M. Interaction of dopamine transporter genotype with prenatal smoke exposure on ADHD symptoms. J Pediatr 2008;152 (2):263–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Miller T, Rauh V, Glied SAM, et al. The economic impact of early life environmental tobacco smoke exposure: early intervention for developmental delay. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114(10):1585–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Huizink A, Mulder EJH. Maternal smoking, drinking or cannabis use during pregnancy and neurobehavioral and cognitive functioning in human offspring. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006;30(1):24–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Kafouri S, Leonard G, Perron M, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and cognitive performance in adolescence. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38(1):158–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Breslau N, Paneth N, Lucia V, Paneth Pollak R. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring IQ. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34(5):1047–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Lambe M, Hultman C, Torrng A, Maccabe J, Cnattingius S. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and school performance at age 15. Epidemiology 2006;17(5):524–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Lundberg F, Cnattingius S, D’Onofrio B, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and intellectual performance in young adult Swedish male offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2010;24(1):79–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Eskenazi B, Trupin LS. Passive and active maternal smoking during pregnancy, as measured by serum cotinine, and postnatal smoke exposure. II. Effects on neurodevelopment at age 5 years. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142(9 suppl):S19–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Rauh VA, Whyatt RM, Garfinkel R, et al. Developmental effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and material hardship among inner-city children. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2004;26(3):373–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Yolton K, Xu Y, Khoury J, et al. Associations between secondhand smoke exposure and sleep patterns in children. Pediatrics 2010;125(2):e261–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Mortensen E, Michaelsen K, Sanders S, Reinisch J. A dose-response relationship between maternal smoking during late pregnancy and adult intelligence in male offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005;19(1):4–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.O’Callaghan F, Al Mamun A, O’Callaghan M, Alati R, Williams G, Najman J. Is smoking in pregnancy an independent predictor of academic difficulties at 14years of age? A birth cohort study Early Hum Dev 2010;86(2):71–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Montgomery Downs H, Gozal D. Snore-associated sleep fragmentation in infancy: mental development effects and contribution of secondhand cigarette smoke exposure. Pediatrics 2006;117(3):e496–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Stone K, LaGasse L, Lester B, et al. Sleep problems in children with prenatal substance exposure: the Maternal Lifestyle study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164(5): 452–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Byrd RS, Weitzman ML. Predictors of early grade retention among children in the United States. Pediatrics 1994;93 (3):481–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Batstra L, Hadders-Algra M, Neeleman J. Effect of antenatal exposure to maternal smoking on behavioural problems and academic achievement in childhood: prospective evidence from a Dutch birth cohort. Early Hum Dev 2003;75(1–2): 21–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Tremblay R, Nagin D, Sguin J, et al. Physical aggression during early childhood: trajectories and predictors. Pediatrics 2004;114(1):e43–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Consumption of cigarettes and combustible tobacco—United States, 2000–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61(30):565–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Bloch M, Althabe F, Onyamboko M, et al. Tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy: an investigative survey of women in 9 developing nations. Am J Public Health 2008;98(10):1833–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Aljarrah K, Ababneh ZQ, Al-Delaimy WK. Perceptions of hookah smoking harmfulness: predictors and characteristics among current hookah users. Tob Induc Dis 2009;5(1):16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.An Emerging Deadly Trend: Waterpipe Tobacco Use. Washington: American Lung Association, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Maziak W The global epidemic of waterpipe smoking. Addict Behav 2011;36(1–2):1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Maziak W The waterpipe: an emerging global risk for cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2013;37(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Cobb C, Ward KD, Maziak W, Shihadeh AL, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: an emerging health crisis in the United States. Am J Health Behav 2010;34(3):275–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Noonan D, Kulbok PA. New tobacco trends: waterpipe (hookah) smoking and implications for healthcare providers. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2009;21(5):258–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Shihadeh A, Saleh R. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, “tar”, and nicotine in the mainstream smoke aerosol of the narghile water pipe. Food Chem Toxicol 2005;43(5):655–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Shihadeh AL, Eissenberg TE. Significance of smoking machine toxicant yields to blood-level exposure in water pipe tobacco smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(11):2457–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Mukherjea A, Morgan PA, Snowden LR, Ling PM, Ivey SL. Social and cultural influences on tobacco-related health disparities among South Asians in the USA. Tob Control 2012;21(4):422–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Hammal F, Mock J, Ward KD, Eissenberg T, Maziak W. A pleasure among friends: how narghile (waterpipe) smoking differs from cigarette smoking in Syria. Tob Control 2008; 17(2):e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Tamim H, Yunis KA, Chemaitelly H, Alameh M, Nassar AH. Effect of narghile and cigarette smoking on newborn birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115(1):91–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Bachir R, Chaaya M. Maternal smoking: determinants and associated morbidity in two areas in Lebanon. Matern Child Health J 2008;12(3):298–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Chaaya M, Jabbour S, El-Roueiheb Z, Chemaitelly H. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of argileh (water pipe or hubble-bubble) and cigarette smoking among pregnant women in Lebanon. Addict Behav 2004;29(9):1821–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Nuwayhid IA, Yamout B, Azar G, Kambris MA. Narghile (hubble-bubble) smoking, low birth weight, and other pregnancy outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148(4):375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Mirahmadizadeh A, Nakhaee N. Prevalence of waterpipe smoking among rural pregnant women in Southern Iran. Med Princ Pract 2008;17(6):435–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Critchley JA, Unal B. Health effects associated with smokeless tobacco: a systematic review. Thorax 2003;58(5):435–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Cullen JW, Blot W, Henningfield J, Boyd G, Mecklenburg R, Massey MM. Health consequences of using smokeless tobacco: summary of the Advisory Committee’s report to the Surgeon General. Public Health Rep 1986;101(4): 355–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Kim SY, England L, Dietz PM, Morrow B, Perham-Hester KA. Prenatal cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among Alaska Native and white women in Alaska, 1996–2003. Matern Child Health J 2009;13(5):652–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.van der Eb MM, Leyten EM, Gavarasana S, Vandenbroucke JP, Kahn PM, Cleton FJ. Reverse smoking as a risk factor for palatal cancer: a cross-sectional study in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Cancer 1993;54(5):754–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Steyn K, de Wet T, Saloojee Y, Nel H, Yach D. The influence of maternal cigarette smoking, snuff use and passive smoking on pregnancy outcomes: the Birth To Ten study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006;20(2):90–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Gupta PC, Subramoney S. Smokeless tobacco use, birth weight, and gestational age: population based, prospective cohort study of 1217 women in Mumbai, India. Br Med J 2004;328(7455):1538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.England LJ, Levine RJ, Mills JL, Klebanoff MA, Yu KF, Cnattingius S. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in snuff users. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189(4):939–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Gupta PC, Subramoney S. Smokeless tobacco use and risk of stillbirth: a cohort study in Mumbai, India. Epidemiology 2006;17(1):47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Verma RC, Chansoriya M, Kaul KK. Effect of tobacco chewing by mothers on fetal outcome. Indian Pediatr 1983;20(2):105–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Ashfaq M, Channa MA, Malik MA, Khan D. Morphological changes in human placenta of wet snuff users. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20(2):110–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES