
PONTUS, a Greek word meaning “sea,” generally taken in the ancient world to refer to the Black Sea, Pontos Euxeinos, or Axeinos (Strabo 1.2.10 C21). It also came to be applied more specifically to the Hellenistic kingdom of the Mithridatid rulers that emerged in northern Asia Minor at the end of the 4th century BCE. Strabo (12.1.4 C534) says that both Pontus and its neighbor to the south, Cappadocia, developed from the two Cappadocian satrapies of the Persian empire, and that it was the Macedonians—presumably he means the Seleucids—who had named one Pontus and the other Cappadocia. There is, however, no contemporary evidence that the Mithridatids called themselves “kings of Pontus”; and, although they had a notion of their ancestral domains, it was more probably the influence of the Roman province of Pontus, formed in 63 BCE after the death of Mithridates VI Eupator, that led Strabo and subsequent commentators to apply the term retrospectively to the Mithridatid kingdom. This convenient anachronism has survived to the present day.
Geographically, Pontus divided into two distinct parts—a narrow, coastal strip,and a mountainous, inland region interspersed with fertile river valleys and separated from the sea by the Pontic Alps, which run parallel and close to the coast and which limited routes of communications between the two zones. Strabo, a native of the inland town of Amaseia, gives us valuable information about the region. Greek colonies dominated the coast, most importantly Sinope, the best harbor on the south shore of the Black Sea, which planted its own colonies at Cotyora, Cerasus, and Trapezus. Stamped amphora handles demonstrate the extensive trading links of the coastal cities both with other Black Sea settlements and with the Aegean world. The kingdom was rich in natural resources: a valuable tunny-fishing industry; abundant supplies of wood for shipbuilding; cattle, horses, grains, and fruits in the particularly fertile plain of Themiscyra to the east of Amisus; famous mineral resources in the Paryadres mountains south of Pharnaceia; vines, olives, and other agricultural produce inland at the confluence of the Iris and Lycus rivers in the plain of Phanaroea, the best part of Pontus according to Strabo (12.3.30 C556).
There were three main cultural strands in the population: Greek (mostly on the coast), Persian, and native Anatolian, both associated more with the interior. The most common form of social organization, the villages, can scarcely have had other than age-old Anatolian connotations; they had been there from time immemorial. The best example of their prominence in Pontus is the plain of a thousand villages, Chiliocomum (Strabo 12.3.39 C539). Also representing an enduring symbol of Anatolian continuity was the great temple estate of Ma at Comana, with its six thousand temple servants and extensive sacred territory, all under the authority of the priest, who ranked second in importance after the king (Strabo 12.3.32-36 C557-9). Anatolian too was the temple estate of Men Pharnakou and Selene at Ameria (Strabo 12.3.31 C556), probably founded in the 2nd century BCE by King Pharnakes I (
Bibliography
J. G. C. Anderson, Studia Pontica I. A journey of exploration in Pontus, Brussels, 1903.
J. G. C. Anderson, F. Cumont, H. Grégoire, Studia Pontica III. Recueil des inscriptions grecqus et latines du Pont et de l’Arménie, Brussels, 1910.
A. B. Bosworth, P. V. Wheatley, “The origins of the Pontic house,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 118, 1998, pp. 155-64.
L. Ballasteros Pastor, Mitrídates Eupátor, rey del Ponto, Granada, 1996.
P. Briant, Histoire de l’empire perse de Cyrus à Alexandre, Paris, 1996.
F. Cumont, E. Cumont, Studia Pontica II. Voyage d’exploration archéologique dans le Pont at la Petite Arménie, Brussels, 1906.
B. C. McGing, The foreign policy of Mithridates VI Eupator king of Pontus, Leiden, 1986.
Idem, “On the fringes. Culture and history in the kingdom of Pontus,” VDI 3 1998, no. 3, pp. 97-112 (in Russian).
Ed. Meyer, Geschichte des Königreichs Pontos, Leipzig, 1879.
S. Mitchell, “In search of the Pontic community in antiquity,” in A. K., Bowman, H. M. Cotton, M. Goodman, S. Price, eds., Representations of empire. Rome and the Mediterranean world, Oxford, 2002, pp. 35-64.
E. Olshausen, “Pontos,” in Pauly-Wissowa Suppl. 15, 1978, cols 396-442.
E. Olshausen and J. Biller, Untersuchungen zur historischer Geographie von Pontos unter den Mithridatiden, Wiesbaden, 1984.
T. Reinach, Mithridates Eupator. König von Pontos, Leipzig, 1895.
S. J. Saprykin, The Pontic kingdom, Moscow, 1996 (in Russian).
D. R. Wilson, The historical geography of Bithynia, Paphlagonia and Pontus in the Greek and Roman periods, B.Litt. thesis, Oxford, 1960.
