Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up'Reference - Simple Statements' Translation #186
Conversation
Requires proofreading.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:35 | ||
| msgid "Expression statements" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| msgstr "Les instructions expressions" |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 16, 2018
Member
Pourquoi pas "Les expressions" ?
Une expression je le voit comme quelque chose qui a une valeur, comme 2 * x + 1, une instruction n'a pas de valeur, une instruction c'est "fait ça", comme x = 42.
Donc bien qu'une expression soit un statement, je suis géné par le fait qu'une expression soit une instruction.
Je pense qu'en traduisant statement en "instruction" on rajoute un poil de sens qui n'existe pas dans statement. Peut être que quand ils écrivent statement ils pensent quelque chose comme "énoncé", sans penser "instruction".
Effectivement 1 * 2 + x est un énoncé, comme return 42 est un énoncé. return 42 est une instruction (Renvoie 42 !) mais 1 * 2 + x ne me semble pas en être une, c'est juste un énonce, juste une expression, qui vaut quelque chose, mais qui ne "fait" rien.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:71 | ||
| msgid "Assignment statements" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| msgstr "Les instructions assignations" |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 16, 2018
Member
ou "Les instructions d'assignation" ? Mais si on part par là il faut vérifier qu'on peut le faire pour chaque titre.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:81 | ||
| msgid "" | ||
| "Assignment statements are used to (re)bind names to values and to modify " | ||
| "attributes or items of mutable objects:" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Les instructions assignations sont utilisées pour (re-)lier des noms à des " |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 16, 2018
Member
Et là on peut probablement prendre le raccourci "Les assignations sont utilisées"... ?
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:95 | ||
| msgid "" | ||
| "(See section :ref:`primaries` for the syntax definitions for *attributeref*, " | ||
| "*subscription*, and *slicing*.)" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Voir la section :ref:`primaries` pour la définition de la syntaxe pour " | ||
| "*attributeref*, *subscription*, and *slicing*." |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:95 | ||
| msgid "" | ||
| "(See section :ref:`primaries` for the syntax definitions for *attributeref*, " | ||
| "*subscription*, and *slicing*.)" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Voir la section :ref:`primaries` pour la définition de la syntaxe pour " |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 16, 2018
Member
Peut être "des syntaxes de" ? Ce sont trois syntaxes qui sont derrière primaries.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:121 | ||
| msgid "" | ||
| "If the target list is a single target in parentheses: The object is assigned " | ||
| "to that target." | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "si la liste cible est une simple cible en parenthèses : l'objet est assigné " |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
| @@ -113,6 +147,11 @@ msgid "" | |||
| "items as there are targets in the target list, and the items are assigned, " | |||
| "from left to right, to the corresponding targets." | |||
| msgstr "" | |||
| "Si la liste cible est une liste de cibles dont les éléments sont séparés par " | |||
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 16, 2018
Member
J'ai ouvert un bug upstream parce que la phrase ne me plaît pas à l'origine : https://bugs.python.org/issue33878 voyons comment ça réagit. Mais ça ne nous empêche pas de merger, on "corrigera" si ça bouge upstream.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 17, 2018
Member
Je merge, elle sera marquée fuzzy de toute façons si elle est modifiée upstream, pas besoin de les attendre.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:216 | ||
| msgid "" | ||
| "For user-defined objects, the :meth:`__setitem__` method is called with " | ||
| "appropriate arguments." | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Pour les objets allogènes, la méthode :meth:`__setitem__` est appelée avec " |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
christopheNan
Jun 17, 2018
Author
Collaborator
J'ai proposé cette traduction pour tout ce qui n'est pas natif, c'est-à-dire pour traduire "user-defined".
La définition dans le wiktionnaire (je sais que tu n'es pas fan) est : "D'une origine différente de celle de la population autochtone".
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
|
||
| #: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:369 | ||
| msgid "" | ||
| "Assert statements are a convenient way to insert debugging assertions into a " | ||
| "program:" | ||
| msgstr "" | ||
| "Les instructions assert sont une manière pratique d'insérer des tests de " |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
| "Sinon, :keyword:`raise` évalue la première expression en tant qu'objet " | ||
| "exception. Ce doit être une sous-classe ou une instance de :class:" | ||
| "`BaseException`. Si c'est une classe, l'instance de l'exception est obtenue " | ||
| "en tant que de besoin en instanciant la classe sans argument." |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
christopheNan
Jun 17, 2018
Author
Collaborator
Archaïque d'après l'Académie française mais a priori correct (http://www.academie-francaise.fr/questions-de-langue#31_strong-em-en-tant-que-de-ou-autant-que-de-besoin-raison-em-strong).
Je reformule.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
JulienPalard
Jun 17, 2018
Member
Wah c'est correct en plus :] J'ai vraiment cru que tu t'étais mélangé les doigts sur le clavier ! Cool si tu reformule.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
On pourra toujours s/allogène/nouveau terme/.
Le dim. 17 juin 2018 à 21:28, Julien Palard <notifications@github.com> a
écrit :
… *@JulienPalard* commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In reference/simple_stmts.po
<#186 (comment)>:
>
#: ../Doc/reference/simple_stmts.rst:216
msgid ""
"For user-defined objects, the :meth:`__setitem__` method is called with "
"appropriate arguments."
msgstr ""
+"Pour les objets allogènes, la méthode :meth:`__setitem__` est appelée avec "
Si on ne trouve pas "plus accessible" prennons ça.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#186 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AhYW0AV_2x2Sq_TG7nNKu9bmKqq-OSE9ks5t9q33gaJpZM4UZy5C>
.
--
Christophe Nanteuil
|
Oui pas de souci. |
christopheNan commentedJun 4, 2018
•
edited
Completed.
Requires proofreading.