[GHSA-cf6r-3wgc-h863] Polymorphic deserialization of malicious object in jackson-databind#1768
Closed
Osmankic-Adis_pfghub wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
changed the base branch from
main
to
Osmankic-Adis_pfghub/advisory-improvement-1768
|
Hi @Osmankic-Adis_pfghub, do you have any references to support changing the Integrity and Availability impacts from None to High? |
|
Hi @ronwoch, if you view the NIST NVD entry you can see that the Integrity and Availability impacts are listed as High (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-14892). |
Collaborator
|
👋 This pull request has been marked as stale because it has been open with no activity. You can: comment on the issue or remove the stale label to hold stale off for a while, add the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates
Comments
Looks like this was using the CVSS:3.0 score from CNA instead of the CVSS:3.1 score from NVD. I think we'd want to use the 3.1 score over the 3.0