Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-44522: Fix inaccurate information in open() function (GH-27650) #27681

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2021

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 9, 2021

  • Use "Low surrogate code units" instead of "Unicode Private Use Area"
    (cherry picked from commit b05e9b6)

Co-authored-by: meowmeowmeowcat meowmeowcat1211@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue44522

)

- Use "Low surrogate code units" instead of "Unicode Private Use Area"
(cherry picked from commit b05e9b6)

Co-authored-by: meowmeowmeowcat <meowmeowcat1211@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@meowmeowmeowcat and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Copy link
Contributor

@ambv ambv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doc-only change.

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit c79aa42 into python:3.10 Aug 9, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-b05e9b6-3.10 branch August 9, 2021 14:35
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@meowmeowmeowcat and @ambv: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants