Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide support code for making HTTP requests and processing the responses #89

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 14, 2022

Conversation

brettcannon
Copy link
Owner

@brettcannon brettcannon commented Dec 11, 2022

Closes #75
Closes #77

@brettcannon brettcannon self-assigned this Dec 11, 2022
@brettcannon brettcannon requested a review from d3r3kk Dec 11, 2022
d3r3kk
d3r3kk approved these changes Dec 12, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@d3r3kk d3r3kk left a comment

Looks good.

Need to fix the nit the CI is reporting.

Should we include a negative test here as well, showing that the documented assert is raised when you give any non-accepted type? (That might actually be related to the missing ~3.5% coverage perhaps).

@brettcannon brettcannon requested a review from d3r3kk Dec 14, 2022
@brettcannon
Copy link
Owner Author

brettcannon commented Dec 14, 2022

@d3r3kk you were right as to why coverage wasn't passing. 😅

@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 914489e into main Dec 14, 2022
7 checks passed
@brettcannon brettcannon deleted the content_type_helper branch Dec 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants