Abstract

The world's domestic cats carry patterns of sequence variation in their genome that reflect a history of domestication and breed development. A genetic assessment of 979 domestic cats and their wild progenitors—Felis silvestris silvestris (European wildcat), F. s. lybica (Near Eastern wildcat), F. s. ornata (central Asian wildcat), F. s. cafra (southern African wildcat), and F. s. bieti (Chinese desert cat)—indicated that each wild group represents a distinctive subspecies of Felis silvestris. Further analysis revealed that cats were domesticated in the Near East, probably coincident with agricultural village development in the Fertile Crescent. Domestic cats derive from at least five founders from across this region, whose descendants were transported across the world by human assistance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (1139518_sfigs.zip)
File (driscoll.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
J. A. Clutton-Brock, Natural History of Domesticated Mammals (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999).
2
A. Kitchener, The Natural History of the Wild Cats (Comstock Associates, Ithaca, NY, 1991).
3
G. Stephens, T. Yamazaki, Legacy of the Cat: The Ultimate Illustrated Guide (Chronicle, San Francisco, 2001).
4
S. Budiansky, The Covenant of the Wild: Why Animals Chose Domestication (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, 1999).
5
J. M. Legay, C. R. Acad. Sci. III303, 709 (1986).
6
J.-D. Vigne, J. Guilaine, K. Debue, L. Haye, P. Gérard, Science304, 259 (2004).
7
M. D. Donalson, The Domestic Cat in Roman Civilization (Mellen, New York, 1999).
8
B. Kurten, Acta Zool. Fenn.111, 3 (1965).
9
R. I. Pocock, Catalogue of the Genus Felis (British Museum–Natural History, London, 1951).
10
C. M. Vella, L. M. Shelton, J. J. McGonagle, T. W. Stanglein, Robinson's Genetics for Cat Breeders & Veterinarians (Elsevier Science, Edinburgh, 2003).
11
D. W. Macdonald et al., Adv. Ethol.28, 1 (1987).
12
K. Nowell, P. Jackson, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Wild Cats (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland, 1996).
13
M. E. Sunquist, F. Sunquist, Wild Cats of the World (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002).
14
R. I. Pocock, Proc. Zool. Soc. London1907, 656 (1907).
15
E. Randi, B. Ragni, J. Mammal.72, 79 (1991).
16
D. W. Macdonald, M. J. Daniels, C. Driscoll, A. C. Kitchener, N. Yamaguchi, The Scottish Wildcat: Analyses for Conservation and an Action Plan (Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford, 2004).
17
M. Beaumont et al., Mol. Ecol.10, 319 (2001).
18
E. Randi et al., Mol. Biol. Evol.18, 1679 (2001).
19
R. Lecis et al., Mol. Ecol.15, 119 (2006).
20
W. E. Johnson et al., Science311, 73 (2006).
21
M. Menotti-Raymond et al., Cytogenet. Genome Res.102, 272 (2003).
22
D. L. Swofford, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) (Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, 1985).
23
J. P. Huelsenbeck, F. Ronquist, Bioinformatics17, 754 (2001).
24
N. Yamaguchi et al., Anim. Conserv.7, 339 (2004).
25
J. K. Pritchard, P. Donnelly, Theor. Popul. Biol.60, 227 (2001).
26
N. Takezaki et al., Mol. Biol. Evol.12, 828 (1995).
27
J. V. Lopez, M. Culver, J. C. Stephens, W. E. Johnson, S. J. O'Brien, Mol. Biol. Evol.14, 277 (1997).
28
See supporting material on Science Online.
29
S. J. O'Brien, W. E. Johnson, Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.6, 407 (2005).
30
K. Tanno, G. Willcox, Science311, 1886 (2006).
31
G. Willcox, in 13th IWGP Symposium, R. Buxo, S. Jacomet, F. Bitmann, Eds. (Springer, Girona, Spain, 2005), pp. 534–541.
32
P. L. Morrell, M. T. Clegg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 3289 (2007).
33
We thank M. W. Smith, A. Schmidt-Kuntzel, C. O'hUigen, and B. Gold for discussions and J. Bruksch, A. Brandt, S. Rosendale, and F. Hussain for technical assistance. We appreciate the efforts of all of our collaborators listed in fig. S1 who provided biological specimens used in this study. All tissues were collected in full compliance with federal fish and wildlife permits [Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)] issued to the National Cancer Institute (NCI; principal officer, S.J.O.) by the Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Supported by NCI grant N01-CO-12400 and the Intramural Research Program of the NCI Center for Cancer Research. Sequences have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers EF587016 to EF587179.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 317 | Issue 5837
27 July 2007

Article versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

Submission history

Received: 4 January 2007
Accepted: 18 June 2007
Published in print: 27 July 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
SOM Text
Tables S1 to S6
Figs. S1 and S2
References

Authors

Affiliations

Carlos A. Driscoll*
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Marilyn Menotti-Raymond
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Alfred L. Roca
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, SAIC-Frederick Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Karsten Hupe
Jagd Einrichtungs Büro, Am Sahlbach 9a, 37170 Fürstenhagen, Germany.
Warren E. Johnson
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Eli Geffen
Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Eric H. Harley
Division of Chemical Pathology, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Miguel Delibes
Department of Applied Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Avda Maria Luisa s/n Pabellón del Perú, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.
Dominique Pontier
UMR-CNRS 5558 Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, 43 boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Andrew C. Kitchener
Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK.
Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK.
Nobuyuki Yamaguchi
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Stephen J. O'Brien*
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
David W. Macdonald*
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Genetic relationships and inbreeding levels among geographically distant populations of Felis catus from Japan and the United States, Genomics, 113, 1, (104-110), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.11.018
    Crossref
  2. A review of the history of taxonomy and species criteria in the family Felidae, Novitates Theriologicae, 12, (300-314), (2021).https://doi.org/10.53452/nt1247
    Crossref
  3. Pleistocene extinction and geographic singularity explain differences in global felid ensemble structure, Evolutionary Ecology, 35, 2, (271-289), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-021-10103-2
    Crossref
  4. On the use of genome‐wide data to model and date the time of anthropogenic hybridisation: An example from the Scottish wildcat, Molecular Ecology, 30, 15, (3688-3702), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16000
    Crossref
  5. Patterns and drivers of genetic diversity among Felidae species, Biodiversity and Conservation, 30, 2, (519-546), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02103-5
    Crossref
  6. Inexperienced but still interested – Indoor-only cats are more inclined for predatory play than cats with outdoor access, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 241, (105373), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105373
    Crossref
  7. Study of non-metric characters of the skull to determine the epigenetic variability in populations of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus), Mammalian Biology, 101, 4, (407-417), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00119-0
    Crossref
  8. Do all roads lead to resistance? State road density is the main impediment to gene flow in a flagship species inhabiting a severely fragmented anthropogenic landscape, Ecology and Evolution, 11, 13, (8528-8541), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7635
    Crossref
  9. Cats Felis catus as a threat to bats worldwide: a review of the evidence , Mammal Review, 51, 3, (323-337), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12240
    Crossref
  10. Genomic evidence for the Chinese mountain cat as a wildcat conspecific (Felis silvestris bieti) and its introgression to domestic cats, Science Advances, 7, 26, (2021)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg0221
    Abstract
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media