Block or Report
Block or report seberg
Report abuse
Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.
Report abusePopular repositories
-
-
-
experimental_user_dtypes Public
This repository houses experimental numpy DTypes using the new API (and related features). EXPECT THIS TO VANISH, I plan to move this to the NumPy org when the dust settles.
1,073 contributions in the last year
Less
More
Activity overview
Contribution activity
December 2022
Created 47 commits in 3 repositories
Created 1 repository
Created a pull request in numpy/numpy that received 61 comments
ENH,DEP: Add DTypePromotionError and finalize the == and != FutureWarning/Deprecation
Opening as a draft, because I think I should probably split it out the pieces (although it isn't as huge as one might think). The PR effectively do…
+407
−258
•
61
comments
Opened 9 other pull requests in 3 repositories
numpy/numpy
4
merged
1
open
numpy/numpy-user-dtypes
3
merged
python/cpython
1
open
Reviewed 15 pull requests in 2 repositories
numpy/numpy
14 pull requests
- BUG: Quantile function on complex number now throws an error (#22652)
- BLD: bump pypy testing version, add pypy3.9 wheels
- DOC: add numerical integration of x^2 to trapz
- DOC: Fix release note link to out-of-bounds integer deprecation
- API: Hide exceptions from the main namespace
- DOC: Improve description of the dtype parameter in np.array docstring
-
BUG:
keepdims=Trueis ignored ifoutis notNoneinnumpy.median. -
ENH: Added
bit_countUFuncs - DOC: Add examples for setbufsize & getbufsize
- ENH,DEP: Add DTypePromotionError and finalize the == and != FutureWarning/Deprecation
- ENH: Speedup masked array creation when mask=None
- BUG: Fix some valgrind errors (and probably harmless warnings)
- DEV: Add initial devcontainer config for codepaces
- TST: Skip when numba/numpy compat issues cause SystemError
numpy/numpy-user-dtypes
1 pull request
Created an issue in numpy/numpy that received 2 comments
DISCUSS: Change the context setup used in "ArrayMethod" ufunc loops?
This is just an early thought, but I am wondering whether we should change the "context" used in the ufunc inner-loop. We currently have a context:
C…
2
comments




