Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
Yep. That's not a very informative message. |
Contributor
|
Taking a bit of a deeper look here and I can add a message, but there is a limit to how precise it can be. All we can know is that there is a tuple that does not have the expected number of columns. To get more info here (or to find it earlier before evaluation), we will need to integrate deeper with the compiler, which is not planned for the next quarter. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a reproduction example for getting an error message in case the number of elements in the arrays provided as data extensions values do not match the arity of the extensible predicate.
To reproduce, checkout this branch and
codeql test run java/ql/test/library-tests/dataflow/external-modelsThis leads to the following error message.
@aeisenberg: Would it somehow be possible to improve the error message?