Skip to content

[3.9] bpo-42340: Document issues around KeyboardInterrupt (GH-23255) #32184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Mar 29, 2022

Update documentation to note that in some circumstances,
KeyboardInterrupt may cause code to enter an inconsistent state. Also
document sample workaround to avoid KeyboardInterrupt, if needed.
(cherry picked from commit d0906c9)

Co-authored-by: benfogle benfogle@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue42340

Update documentation to note that in some circumstances,
KeyboardInterrupt may cause code to enter an inconsistent state. Also
document sample workaround to avoid KeyboardInterrupt, if needed.
(cherry picked from commit d0906c9)

Co-authored-by: benfogle <benfogle@gmail.com>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@benfogle and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 2 of 5 required status checks are expected..

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra self-assigned this Mar 29, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@benfogle and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit c26af2b into python:3.9 Mar 29, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-d0906c9-3.9 branch March 29, 2022 21:48
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@benfogle and @JelleZijlstra: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants