Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: move tooltest to before jstest target #29220

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Member

@danbev danbev commented Aug 20, 2019

This commit moves the tooltest target to come before the jstest target
to make the console output consistent with it was before I introduced
the tooltest target.

Currently the output looks like this which is might give the impression
that only one test was run:

/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -s tooltest
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

Compared to the usual:

[03:58|% 100|+ 2739|-   0]: Done

@nodejs/build-files

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

This commit moves the tooltest target to come before the jstest target
to make the console output consistent with it was before I introduced
the tooltest target.

Currently the output looks like this which is might give the impression
that only one test was run:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -s tooltest
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

Compared to the usual:
[03:58|% 100|+ 2739|-   0]: Done
@danbev
Copy link
Member Author

@danbev danbev commented Aug 20, 2019

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung left a comment

LGTM considering what the message looks like, though to be honest I think piling non-functional tests before functional tests is not ideal..

@danbev
Copy link
Member Author

@danbev danbev commented Aug 20, 2019

LGTM considering what the message looks like, though to be honest I think piling non-functional tests before functional tests is not ideal..

Would you prefer taking it out of the test target, and have in a different target, or let it be a target to be run manually?

@danbev
Copy link
Member Author

@danbev danbev commented Aug 23, 2019

Landed in db3fdfb.

@danbev danbev closed this Aug 23, 2019
danbev added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2019
This commit moves the tooltest target to come before the jstest target
to make the console output consistent with it was before I introduced
the tooltest target.

Currently the output looks like this which is might give the impression
that only one test was run:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -s tooltest
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

Compared to the usual:
[03:58|% 100|+ 2739|-   0]: Done

PR-URL: #29220
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@danbev danbev deleted the build-move-tooltest branch Aug 23, 2019
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2019
This commit moves the tooltest target to come before the jstest target
to make the console output consistent with it was before I introduced
the tooltest target.

Currently the output looks like this which is might give the impression
that only one test was run:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/make -s tooltest
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.000s

Compared to the usual:
[03:58|% 100|+ 2739|-   0]: Done

PR-URL: #29220
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants