Expose types.GenericAlias.__getitem__#3499
Merged
youknowone merged 2 commits intoJan 22, 2022
Merged
Conversation
youknowone
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2021
Member
youknowone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@qingshi163 @Snowapril can this be wriiten with mapping protocol?
Snowapril
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2021
Contributor
Snowapril
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@youknowone ooh yeah, It can. Actually it must be slot-wrapper (wrapper_descriptor) not a bounded method. At current step, as all the other types that implementing mapping protocol have them as bounded method, seems reasonable 😊
752a975 to
964304e
Compare
youknowone
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
While making #3497 work, I found
types.GenericAlias.__getitem__wasn't exposed. This pull request just makes itCheck
You can run the below lines to test.
Before this pull request, you can see: