To get one GIL per interpreter (bpo-40512), either PyObject.ob_refcnt member must become an atomic variable, or subinterpreters must not share any object.

Right now, subinterpreters share Python objects. For example, PyModule_Type is declared statically and so shared by all interpreters and so PyModule_Type.tp_mro tuple is accessed in parallel by multiple interpreters. If PyObject.ob_refcnt is not atomic, Py_INCREF() and Py_DECREF() are unsafe and tp_mro tuple can be destroyed whereas it is still used.

I propose to make PyObject.ob_refcnt atomic for now, when Python is built with EXPERIMENTAL_ISOLATED_SUBINTERPRETERS macro defined. It's a temporary workaround until subinterpreters stop sharing objects.

Yep, before per-interpreter GIL is official we must get to the point where *no* PyObject objects are shared.

Making PyObject.ob_refcnt atomic until then (only as part of the experiment) should be fine.

> Yep, before per-interpreter GIL is official we must get to the point where *no* PyObject objects are shared.

I would like to add: "no PyObject objects are shared in the stdlib" ;-)

New changeset d8135e913ab7c694db247c86d0a84c450c32d86e by Victor Stinner in branch 'master':
bpo-40533: Disable GC in subinterpreters (GH-19961)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d8135e913ab7c694db247c86d0a84c450c32d86e

> For example, PyModule_Type is declared statically and so shared by all interpreters and so PyModule_Type.tp_mro tuple is accessed in parallel by multiple interpreters.

Another example of this issue are parallel Py_INCREF/Py_DECREF calls on the tp_bases member of a type.

> To get one GIL per interpreter (bpo-40512), either PyObject.ob_refcnt member must become an atomic variable, or subinterpreters must not share any object.

The current plan is to not share any object between two interpreters, so this PR is not needed. I close my PR 19958 which marked PyObject.ob_refcnt as atomic.