Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Engine Request: Puppet engine #437

Open
sysadmiral opened this issue May 13, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Engine Request: Puppet engine #437

sysadmiral opened this issue May 13, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@sysadmiral
Copy link
Contributor

@sysadmiral sysadmiral commented May 13, 2016

I was wondering if a puppet engine was planned? Given that a chef engine exists...

There is puppet-lint (rubygem) available and puppet validate (although I don't think the output is usable/useful).

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Contributor

@pbrisbin pbrisbin commented May 13, 2016

Hi @sysadmiral, we don't have any specific plans for a puppet engine at the moment but that doesn't mean it won't happen. Certainly if you (or anyone) would like to work on wrapping puppet-lint up as an Engine, we'd love to have it.

We actually have a codeclimate-community slack organization where folks hang out to discuss engine ideas and development. If you're interested (you don't have to be authoring an engine to participate in the discussion), you can join our Developer Program to get an invite.

@bittner
Copy link

@bittner bittner commented May 23, 2018

There is a pdk validate command now for linting file formats present in Puppet modules. See Validating and testing modules using the Puppet Development Kit.

@maxjacobson
Copy link
Contributor

@maxjacobson maxjacobson commented May 23, 2018

Neat. If you (or someone else reading this) are interested in spearheading the effort to add a Puppet engine, I'd recommend:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.