Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would be good to have bottles #27

Open
BrendanSimon opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 10 comments
Open

Would be good to have bottles #27

BrendanSimon opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 10 comments
Labels

Comments

@BrendanSimon
Copy link

@BrendanSimon BrendanSimon commented Sep 5, 2018

Would be good to have bottles, for quicker installs and also know the exact binaries people have installed.
Is that possible or just too hard?

@sashkab
Copy link
Owner

@sashkab sashkab commented Sep 6, 2018

Hi, thanks for suggestion. I agree, but I don't have a space to host bottles.

@desertkun
Copy link

@desertkun desertkun commented Sep 27, 2018

AFAIK you can upload them to bintray (For Open Source Plan).

@sashkab
Copy link
Owner

@sashkab sashkab commented Sep 27, 2018

Thanks for the link @desertkun. I'll research this.

@sashkab
Copy link
Owner

@sashkab sashkab commented Oct 8, 2018

I don't think I will be doing anything here. Due to removal of i386 SDK in latest version of command line tools, there is no way to support universal binaries on macOS 10.13+. I've deprecated this project.

@sashkab sashkab closed this Oct 8, 2018
@BrendanSimon
Copy link
Author

@BrendanSimon BrendanSimon commented Oct 8, 2018

That's a shame :(
I don't use this project for i386 builds. I use this project to get the various versions of python (e.g 2.7, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7) and keep them up to date (instead of the latest 2.x or 3.x which homebrew does by default)

@desertkun
Copy link

@desertkun desertkun commented Oct 9, 2018

Same, could you please at lease support x64?

@sashkab
Copy link
Owner

@sashkab sashkab commented Oct 9, 2018

@BrendanSimon @desertkun — didn't know someone was using this for something other than universal binaries. Wondering why you decided to use this, while there is better solution — pyenv?

@desertkun
Copy link

@desertkun desertkun commented Oct 9, 2018

AFAIK, pyenv doesn't do binaries, which is the whole purpose of this issue. I, in the other hand, just want to have a quick install instead.

@sashkab
Copy link
Owner

@sashkab sashkab commented Nov 26, 2018

Reopening, to implement at some time in a future.

@sashkab sashkab added the help wanted label Jan 4, 2019
@sashkab
Copy link
Owner

@sashkab sashkab commented Jan 9, 2019

Depends on #34.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.