-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
Open
Labels
In DiscussionNot yet reached consensusNot yet reached consensusSuggestionAn idea for TypeScriptAn idea for TypeScript
Description
Search Terms
constructor return type
Suggestion
Add an ability to specify return type of a class constructor.
Right now the compiler produces the following error: "Type annotation cannot appear on a constructor declaration."
Use Cases
Consider this example:
interface MyInterface {
readonly data: ReadonlyArray<string>
add(item: string): void
remove(item: string): void
// ...more
}
class MyClass implements MyInterface {
data = [] as string[]
constructor(): MyInterface {} // right now it's an error
add(item: string) {
this.data.push(item)
}
// ...more
}
Current behavior:
const c = new MyClass() // typeof c == MyClass
c.data = [] // oops! no error from the compiler
Suggested behavior:
const c = new MyClass() // typeof c == MyInterface
c.data = [] // the compiler generates an error here, correct behavior
Of course, there are several ways to achieve this result (like using private constructor with factory function, or using a type converter like this:
type AsInterface<T, C> = C extends new (...args: infer A) => T ? new (...args: A) => T : never
But I think that the proposed feature is more concise
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript / JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. new expression-level syntax)
dragomirtitian, demurgos, trotyl, artbud, jcalz and 31 morechharvey and ErroneousFatalityIceReaper, missmoode, robbiespeed and kravetsone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
In DiscussionNot yet reached consensusNot yet reached consensusSuggestionAn idea for TypeScriptAn idea for TypeScript