Question about tags #209
Open
Question about tags #209
Labels
Comments
|
@hbarina That seems like a reasonable feature. I'd be happy to accept a PR for it! |
|
I do have a working patch, just need to update the spec tests and
documentation.
…On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:50 PM Andrew Hayworth ***@***.***> wrote:
@hbarina <https://github.com/hbarina> That seems like a reasonable
feature. I'd be happy to accept a PR for it!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#209?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADNBUMUUB6NKHFCVLBZHY6LQRIFRXA5CNFSM4G7MGSYKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECWASVI#issuecomment-548145493>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNBUMSG4UGIFIGSXHBGLHTQRIFRXANCNFSM4G7MGSYA>
.
|
|
Sounds great, I look forward to it! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is there any way to have octocatalog-diff do the opposite of --ignore-tags? I'd like to be able to specify one or more tags and have octocatalog-diff only compare resources containing those tags? This would help predict the behavior of running puppet with those tags.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: