JS: support additional promisification of the fs-module members#3803
Merged
Conversation
esbena
added
the
Awaiting evaluation
erik-krogh
previously approved these changes
Jun 25, 2020
Contributor
Author
|
smoke test / security is uneventful. |
esbena
force-pushed
the
js/more-fs-promises
branch
from
b71805c to
c7f67fa
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
(rebased) |
erik-krogh
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2020
esbena
removed
the
Awaiting evaluation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We already support
util.promisify(fs.readFileSync)(path)as a direct call tofs.readFileSync. This PR adds additional opaque support for that pattern.