Should I add a test that checks in case a response started that the handler is still called?

@tomchristie Thoughts?

@aviramha I'm not sure I understand the use case here. Can you clarify why we'd want/need to move the call to the installed error handler separately from the other cases?

@aviramha I'm not sure I understand the use case here. Can you clarify why we'd want/need to move the call to the installed error handler separately from the other cases?

The use case are exception handlers not being called on background tasks since the response already started. This changes the logic so the handlers will be called even if response is returned. It's extremely important for usage of error loggers like sentry etc.

Any update? :)