Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename Jetbrains Ignore-File and Add Some Symlinks, to Improve Visibility #3349

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

@drothmaler
Copy link
Contributor

@drothmaler drothmaler commented Mar 25, 2020

Reasons for making this change:

The Jetbrains.gitignore, actually only covers JetBrains products, that are based on the IntelliJ Platform.
JetBrains also offers other products, that are not base on it (e. g. Resharper) and
therefore would need a totally different gitignore file.

So it seems to be more appropriate to name it according to the platform instead of the company.

Also the names "JetBrains" or "IntelliJ" might not be obvious to somebody looking for "GoLang" or "PhpStorm". I think this is one of the factors, why Pull Requests are created again an again, seeking to add IntelliJ ignore rules to all kinds of other languages or even new ignore files.

Adding some symlinks will hopefully solve the problem and will make it easier for people to find what they are looking for.

…lity

This gitignore, only covers JetBrains products,
that are based on the IntelliJ Platform.
JetBrains also offers other products,
that are not base on IntelliJ (e. g. Resharper) and
therefore would need a totally different gitignore file.

So it seems to be more appropriate to name it according to
the platform instead of the company.

Also the names "JetBrains" or "IntelliJ" might not be obvious to somebody
looking for "GoLang" or "PhpStorm".
Adding some symlinks will hopefully solve the problem and
will make it easier for people to find what they are looking for.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants