Skip to content

/ jedi

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create a Database Index for Jedi #1059

Open
davidhalter opened this issue Mar 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Create a Database Index for Jedi #1059

davidhalter opened this issue Mar 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
database-index discussion

Comments

@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner

@davidhalter davidhalter commented Mar 12, 2018

For a lot of things (especially usages) jedi's completely lazy approach is not good enough. It is probably better to use a database index cache. The index will basically be a graph that saves all the type inference findings.

This is just an issue for discussion and collection of possible ideas.
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2018
Closed
@hajs
Copy link

@hajs hajs commented Mar 21, 2018

Recently I wrote my own source indexer using jedi.
I used a sqlite databases with four tables: file, name, definition and reference.
Indexing stdlib took about four minutes using multiprocessing on four cores,

It would be great if the index could be exposed to the public api in some way.
Besides finding all usages of a definition, a database could be used to offer auto imports and fast fuzzy auto-complete.
@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

@davidhalter davidhalter commented Mar 21, 2018

That's actually pretty fast. Did you index all the subfolders (asyncio, multiprocessing, json, etc)?

Also can you post the script? I wonder if it's "complete".
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2018
Closed
This was referenced Sep 30, 2018
Closed
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Dec 23, 2018
Closed
@davidhalter
Copy link
Owner Author

@davidhalter davidhalter commented Dec 23, 2018

@hajs I would still be interested :)
This was referenced Feb 24, 2019
Closed
Closed
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2019
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2019
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Jun 12, 2019
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Jun 22, 2019
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Aug 11, 2019
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Sep 19, 2019
Closed
@scarab5q scarab5q mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2019
Closed
@kirk86 kirk86 mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2019
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2019
Closed
This was referenced Dec 13, 2019
Closed
Closed
This was referenced Jan 5, 2020
Closed
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Feb 3, 2020
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Feb 20, 2020
Closed
@davidhalter davidhalter mentioned this issue Mar 5, 2020
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
database-index discussion
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
@davidhalter @hajs
You can’t perform that action at this time.