Skip to content
clojure.spec for Javascript
Branch: master
Clone or download
Permalink
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
dist Export the Spec class as AbstractSpec so one can implement a Spec cla… Feb 18, 2018
lib Spec name is not actually optional and cannot be defaulted to empty s… Feb 14, 2018
test Move types-test.ts to the test folder Feb 19, 2018
types Move types-test.ts to the test folder Feb 19, 2018
.babelrc Eslint babel parser, object spread babel plugin Aug 14, 2017
.eslintrc.json
.eslintrc.test.json Update eslint and prettier Nov 30, 2017
.gitignore 🔧 #13 host UMD bundle Dec 5, 2016
.npmignore 🔧 #13 ignore browser bundle for npm Dec 5, 2016
.travis.yml Test node 9 in Travis Nov 29, 2017
LICENSE Initial commit Nov 3, 2016
README.md Fix documentation link in README Oct 11, 2018
example.js Throw on undefined predicates Aug 13, 2017
index.js Export the Spec class as AbstractSpec so one can implement a Spec cla… Feb 18, 2018
logo.png 💄 logo yay Jan 2, 2017
logo.svg 💄 logo yay Jan 2, 2017
package.json v1.0.0-23 Feb 19, 2018
webpack.config.js Update dependencies Aug 13, 2017
yarn.lock Move types from DefinitelyTyped to here. Feb 19, 2018

README.md

js.spec

clojure.spec for Javascript

Latest build Coverage Status npm version

logo

There is clojure.spec, a part of Clojure's core library that is intended to help with specification, testing and error messages. I recommend you to read the linked rationale, you will get the gist even without knowledge of Clojure. In any case here's my best attempt of a summary:

In a dynamic language like Javascript or Clojure it is common to represent information with data. For instance, you could encode the score of a soccer match with a list of two integers [0, 1]. (In a statically typed language like Java the idiomatic way would be an instance of a SoccerScore class.) This data is passed around between modules of your code or sent to external systems, yet the knowledge about what this list of integers stands for is not available anywhere. Maybe you described it in the project's documentation, which is likely outdated. Most probably it is implicitly assumed in your code (var goals_scored = score[0] + score[1];). If the semantics change (e.g. list contains also teams), your code breaks.

One way to mitigate this is by static analysis tools (Flow) or typed languages (Typescript), but they only get you so far. For instance they don't work at runtime (duh!) and offer limited expressiveness. (They also need more tooling, but that's another story.) So what you're left with is manual parsing and checking, which is repetitive and half-assed at worst (if (!Array.isArray(score)) ...), and non-standard at best, ie. there is no way for users of your function to know where exactly their provided input failed your specification.

Another issue is that schemas get more popular in the Javascript community (JSON Schema, React.PropTypes...), yet there is no uniform way to define them. Error messages differ from system to system. You can't port your schemas, but need to define them multiple times in different syntax.

js.spec tries to solve those problems.

Usage

For a quick usage example see example.js. Otherwise please refer to the documentation.

Documentation

https://prayerslayer.gitbooks.io/js-spec/content/

Installation

npm install js.spec

This will install the current release candidate, as there is no 1.0 yet.

If you want to include it into a web page directly via script, please use the UMD build like this:

<script src="./js.spec.bundle.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  const {spec, valid} = window['js.spec']
  const foo = spec.map("foo", {
    name: spec.string
  })
  alert(valid(foo, {name: 'hugo'}))
</script>

Implementation Status

The 0.0.x published versions should be seen as developer previews. Code may or may not work. API may or may not witness breaking changes.

  • Specs
    • Primitives
    • Map
    • Collection
    • Combination
      • And
      • Or
    • Tuple
    • Nilable
    • Enum
  • Spec Registry Removed after discussion in #21
  • 🚧 Spec Regexes (cat, alt, *, ?, +)
  • 😰 Generator Functions
  • 😫 Function Specs (Not even sure if it's possible the way it works in clojure.spec)

Why not use Clojurescript?

If you already thought about using CLJS, go ahead. clojure.spec is already available there. However if you meant to pull in CLJS as a dependency: clojure.spec is macro-heavy. Macros exist only at compile-time, so all the "functions" (they are macros) are gone.

License

MIT, see LICENSE

You can’t perform that action at this time.