New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: use ArrayBufferViewContents more frequently #27920
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Using `ArrayBufferViewContents` over `Buffer::Data()`/`Buffer::Length()` or `SPREAD_BUFFER_ARG` has the advantages of creating fewer individual variables to keep track off, not being a “magic” macro that creates variables, reducing code size, and being faster when receiving on-heap TypedArrays.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
May 28, 2019
|
Any other interested reviewers? :) |
sam-github
approved these changes
May 29, 2019
cjihrig
approved these changes
May 29, 2019
|
Landed in 5026db1 |
pull bot
pushed a commit
to zys-contrib/node
that referenced
this issue
May 29, 2019
Using `ArrayBufferViewContents` over `Buffer::Data()`/`Buffer::Length()` or `SPREAD_BUFFER_ARG` has the advantages of creating fewer individual variables to keep track off, not being a “magic” macro that creates variables, reducing code size, and being faster when receiving on-heap TypedArrays. PR-URL: nodejs#27920 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 31, 2019
Using `ArrayBufferViewContents` over `Buffer::Data()`/`Buffer::Length()` or `SPREAD_BUFFER_ARG` has the advantages of creating fewer individual variables to keep track off, not being a “magic” macro that creates variables, reducing code size, and being faster when receiving on-heap TypedArrays. PR-URL: #27920 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Using
ArrayBufferViewContentsoverBuffer::Data()/Buffer::Length()orSPREAD_BUFFER_ARGhas theadvantages of creating fewer individual variables to keep track off,
not being a “magic” macro that creates variables, reducing code size,
and being faster when receiving on-heap TypedArrays.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes