Collections
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Twitter will not mute world leaders – after calls to remove Trump´s timeline
http://iuvmpress.com/20786
http://iuvmpress.com/20786
Post has attachment
Scientist Reveals What is so Special About the New Chinese Moon Mission
https://search.app.goo.gl/B6eo
Shared from my Google feed
https://search.app.goo.gl/B6eo
Shared from my Google feed
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
President Uhuru Kenyatta is this week expected to send the names of three nominees for the position of Cabinet Secretaries and that of an ambassador to Parliament to pave way for the vetting process.
Post has attachment
Whales and dolphins exhibit human-like behavior.
'Human-Like' Dolphins and Whales Kept Back From World Domination by Thumbs -- They have complex and social societies, just like us.
Dolphins, whales, and porpoises live “human-like” lives, and it’s all thanks to their big, expansive brains. As scientists report in a new international study, the sophisticated, cooperative behavior of these animals contributes to a rich marine culture that’s uncannily similar to ours. This is because both cetaceans and humans have benefitted from the process of encephalization — an increase in the complexity and size of the brain driven by evolution.
'Human-Like' Dolphins and Whales Kept Back From World Domination by Thumbs -- They have complex and social societies, just like us.
Dolphins, whales, and porpoises live “human-like” lives, and it’s all thanks to their big, expansive brains. As scientists report in a new international study, the sophisticated, cooperative behavior of these animals contributes to a rich marine culture that’s uncannily similar to ours. This is because both cetaceans and humans have benefitted from the process of encephalization — an increase in the complexity and size of the brain driven by evolution.
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Senator Rand Paul's proposal to cut aid to Pakistan & use the money for building infrastructure in the US is surely one of the most reasonable ones.
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
New Design on www.ipSpace.net
One of my readers sent me a polite email a while ago saying “ your site is becoming like $majorVendor’s web site – every corner looks completely different based on when you made it ” Source: Wikimedia Commons The worst part is that he was right, so I spent ...
One of my readers sent me a polite email a while ago saying “ your site is becoming like $majorVendor’s web site – every corner looks completely different based on when you made it ” Source: Wikimedia Commons The worst part is that he was right, so I spent ...
Post has attachment
Woo... "Photographer: Roberto Porto
Summary Authors: Roberto Porto; Jim Foster
Shown above is fantastical sky that looks like it could have been painted by an impressionist artist. I captured this photo in Teide National Park, on the Canary Island of Tenerife (Spain), during the afternoon of November 26, 2017. Referred to as asperatus clouds, it now seems that they form in similar atmospheric conditions that result in mammatus type clouds -- air cooled by the sublimation of ice crystals punching through an existing cloud base. However, with asperatus, strong wind shear at the cloud level causes the clouds to shape into wave-like structures called undulatus. They're not often seen, but when they are, they're always captivating."
Summary Authors: Roberto Porto; Jim Foster
Shown above is fantastical sky that looks like it could have been painted by an impressionist artist. I captured this photo in Teide National Park, on the Canary Island of Tenerife (Spain), during the afternoon of November 26, 2017. Referred to as asperatus clouds, it now seems that they form in similar atmospheric conditions that result in mammatus type clouds -- air cooled by the sublimation of ice crystals punching through an existing cloud base. However, with asperatus, strong wind shear at the cloud level causes the clouds to shape into wave-like structures called undulatus. They're not often seen, but when they are, they're always captivating."
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment

Golden Bubble
This morning we had nice cold temps and little to no wind which are perfect conditions for capturing frozen soap bubbles. So here is my obligatory first frozen soap bubble shot of the season:) I used a different surface to place the soap bubble on and I like the blue reflection it generates. This image edited completely in On1 Photo Raw 2018. Have a great week!
Website: http://georgefletcher.photography
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/georgefletcherphotography 500px: https://500px.com/gffphotos
#BTPMacroPro – +BTP Macro Pro . founded by +Rinus Bakker , owned by +Nancy Dempsey ,curated by +Kenny Jones
#hqspmacro for +HQSP Macro
#winter #cold #frozen #soapbubble #macro #f
This morning we had nice cold temps and little to no wind which are perfect conditions for capturing frozen soap bubbles. So here is my obligatory first frozen soap bubble shot of the season:) I used a different surface to place the soap bubble on and I like the blue reflection it generates. This image edited completely in On1 Photo Raw 2018. Have a great week!
Website: http://georgefletcher.photography
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/georgefletcherphotography 500px: https://500px.com/gffphotos
#BTPMacroPro – +BTP Macro Pro . founded by +Rinus Bakker , owned by +Nancy Dempsey ,curated by +Kenny Jones
#hqspmacro for +HQSP Macro
#winter #cold #frozen #soapbubble #macro #f
Post has attachment

King of the hill?
Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrynchus)
Svalbard
Judging by the amazing size of the antlers, this is perhaps a leader, if not a runner up, as these gloriously large antlers are still in the making.
It was one of a sizeable number of individuals grazing like there was no tomorrow, and what a delicious smorgasbord indeed, as this was a sheltered slope receiving the full force of the sun's light and warmth.
This is one of several sites with an exceptional micro climate where most of the plant species reach their maximum size and the reindeer have easy pickings.
It is an amazing experience to walk in such lush fields in warm sunlight. It resembles a pasture much further south - in mainland Scandinavia.
What is unique to Svalbard is these reindeer are not afraid of humans as they have long been protected, so they will come up towards you and continue to approach if there is anything to eat, just as seen here. In fact a tele lens is not at all necessary!
Image Copyright © 2016 +Morten Ross
Image Capture Date: 01 August 2016 11:57
Altitude: 99 meters
#svalbard #arctic #polar #wildlife
#hqspanimals +HQSP Animals
#BTPAnimalPRO - +BTP Animal Pro , owned by +Nancy Dempsey , curated by +Annette Junge Daugaard
Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrynchus)
Svalbard
Judging by the amazing size of the antlers, this is perhaps a leader, if not a runner up, as these gloriously large antlers are still in the making.
It was one of a sizeable number of individuals grazing like there was no tomorrow, and what a delicious smorgasbord indeed, as this was a sheltered slope receiving the full force of the sun's light and warmth.
This is one of several sites with an exceptional micro climate where most of the plant species reach their maximum size and the reindeer have easy pickings.
It is an amazing experience to walk in such lush fields in warm sunlight. It resembles a pasture much further south - in mainland Scandinavia.
What is unique to Svalbard is these reindeer are not afraid of humans as they have long been protected, so they will come up towards you and continue to approach if there is anything to eat, just as seen here. In fact a tele lens is not at all necessary!
Image Copyright © 2016 +Morten Ross
Image Capture Date: 01 August 2016 11:57
Altitude: 99 meters
#svalbard #arctic #polar #wildlife
#hqspanimals +HQSP Animals
#BTPAnimalPRO - +BTP Animal Pro , owned by +Nancy Dempsey , curated by +Annette Junge Daugaard
Post has attachment

On the door step
“Woe, destruction, ruin, and decay; the worst is death and death will have his day.”
― William Shakespeare, Richard II
#pakistan #blackandwhite #blackandwhitephotography #monochrome #monochromephotography #street #streetphotography
#hqspStreetDoc for +HQSP Street & Documentary
#StreetPhotographySaturday
+Street Photography Saturday curated by +Sunny Wu
#hqspmonochrome for +HQSP Monochrome
+ShowYourBestWork +Britta Rogge +Promote Photography
#promotephotography +Edith Kukla
+BTP Monochrome Pro +BTP Street PRO +BTP Editors' Choice (Top Photo page)
“Woe, destruction, ruin, and decay; the worst is death and death will have his day.”
― William Shakespeare, Richard II
#pakistan #blackandwhite #blackandwhitephotography #monochrome #monochromephotography #street #streetphotography
#hqspStreetDoc for +HQSP Street & Documentary
#StreetPhotographySaturday
+Street Photography Saturday curated by +Sunny Wu
#hqspmonochrome for +HQSP Monochrome
+ShowYourBestWork +Britta Rogge +Promote Photography
#promotephotography +Edith Kukla
+BTP Monochrome Pro +BTP Street PRO +BTP Editors' Choice (Top Photo page)
Post has attachment

Little world
Still life with a helmet https://www.paolodalprato.com/helmet
#macrophotography #hqspmacro #hqspflowers #fotomaniaitalia #ilovephotography #wildflowers
Still life with a helmet https://www.paolodalprato.com/helmet
#macrophotography #hqspmacro #hqspflowers #fotomaniaitalia #ilovephotography #wildflowers
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
... Smartphones are chock-full of sensors -- including cameras, microphones, gyroscopes, and accelerometers -- and Haven uses those sensors to detect disturbances near the phone, alerting you via text. The idea is that you install Haven on a “burner” phone you have lying around, one running Android 4.1 or higher. Once installed, you can set Haven up to detect sound or motion, configuring the levels of detection, and you can use either of the phone's cameras to record video. ...
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
#SocialMediaMarketing strategy starts with measuring your goals, creating measurable social media objectives and developing a #socialmedia content schedule. Pillars of strategy are the following :
#DigitalMarketing #Facebook #Youtube #Twitter #Instagram
#DigitalMarketing #Facebook #Youtube #Twitter #Instagram
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
- SoccerArchitecture PhotographyStar TrekEnvironmental DesignArticles To Get You ThinkingRenewable EnergyBasketballVR & GamesAndroidBeautiful BritainThe Ancient WorldDoodling & DrawingIrelandJapanSci-FiGenealogyAnime80's and 90's Pop CulturePest ControlNorse MythologyArtificial Intelligence & RoboticsWoodworkingThe Global EconomyToy Models & CraftsLandscapingAmazing EarthThe World of Maps and NavigationChessWeddingsCookingCats and DogsCoffee & Tea
Post has attachment
Via Hacker News [ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16094925 ]. As this story shows, discovering Meltdown isn't something new. "The recent reveal of Meltdown and Spectre reminded me of the time I found a related design bug in the Xbox 360 CPU – a newly added instruction whose mere existence was dangerous.
Back in 2005 I was the Xbox 360 CPU guy. I lived and breathed that chip. I still have a 30-cm CPU wafer on my wall, and a four-foot poster of the CPU’s layout. I spent so much time understanding how that CPU’s pipelines worked that when I was asked to investigate some impossible crashes I was able to intuit how a design bug must be their cause.
[...]
All these years later, and even after reading about Meltdown, it’s still nerdy cool to see solid proof that instructions that were not executed were causing crashes."
+Ed S +Alan Cox
Back in 2005 I was the Xbox 360 CPU guy. I lived and breathed that chip. I still have a 30-cm CPU wafer on my wall, and a four-foot poster of the CPU’s layout. I spent so much time understanding how that CPU’s pipelines worked that when I was asked to investigate some impossible crashes I was able to intuit how a design bug must be their cause.
[...]
All these years later, and even after reading about Meltdown, it’s still nerdy cool to see solid proof that instructions that were not executed were causing crashes."
+Ed S +Alan Cox
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
The future historians of +Crooks and Liars examine how Two Minutes Hate will have become from a surreal dystopian concept into a phenomenon of reality.
Post has attachment
Coutinho opens up on his Liverpool departure - 'I gave 100%'
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/philippe-coutinho-leaving-liverpool-join-14124966#ICID=Android_LFCEchoNewsApp_AppShare
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/philippe-coutinho-leaving-liverpool-join-14124966#ICID=Android_LFCEchoNewsApp_AppShare
Post has attachment
We have picked out all these unhealthy habits along with smart changes that will boost the health of your heart.
Post has attachment
COL Reminder Beta Test
https://www.testingcatalog.com/project/141
This is a community to allow people receive the latest Beta version of COL Reminder directly through Google Play.
Just join the community and click on the link below!
Url to join after joining this community:
https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.colapps.reminder
#calendar #reminder #androidapp #betatesting #testmyapp
https://www.testingcatalog.com/project/141
This is a community to allow people receive the latest Beta version of COL Reminder directly through Google Play.
Just join the community and click on the link below!
Url to join after joining this community:
https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.colapps.reminder
#calendar #reminder #androidapp #betatesting #testmyapp
Post has attachment
The 75th year of the Golden Globes was used in the best way possible as a platform to shine a light on issues that really needed to be spoken about.
Post has attachment
There's been a striking technical question about the Mueller investigation, if you're into lawyers going meta. How can Rosenstein possibly be supervising Mueller, if Mueller is looking at Trump's firing of Comey, given that Rosenstein was right in the middle of that? Why hasn't Rosenstein had to recuse himself?
Recall, Rosenstein wrote the letter that Trump used as a pretext for firing Comey. Is reported that he wrote this letter with awareness that Trump wanted this to quash the FBI's Russia counterintelligence investigation. You'd think Mueller would have Rosenstein as a witness.
One can imagine pragmatic reasons why Rosenstein might think that staying in the role actually protects the investigation, but utilitarian arguments are of little weight on a recusal question. And it's hard to imagine either Rosenstein or Mueller would want any kind of stretching of normal ethics rules under the circumstance. They must think they have solid reasons why this is fine.
Here's one proposal from a June 2017 article: so maybe Mueller's not investigating Comey's firing. Nobody with knowledge has stated that he is.
https://www.justsecurity.org/42249/basis-rod-rosenstein-recuse/
I came to post it here, but… reading it over again, I'm not a lawyer but Lederman's argument seems to me to have some soft spots. Any lawyer in the house? In the end I am still very puzzled what's going on with Rosenstein.
Lederman argues, first, even if Mueller is investigating Comey's firing, he doesn't need Rosenstein's testimony. He needs to establish a motive meeting the standard of "corrupt". But Trump already stated motive to CNN and to the Russians, Lederman argues, and Rosenstein would just confirm. I don't think this makes sense, though. First, if you were prosecuting a case of this seriousness, wouldn't you want all the evidence in your favor? But a more fundamental issue with the argument -- can you seriously finesse the need to recuse by playing "speak no evil, hear no evil" with a witness? That seems absurd. If two people robbed a bank, and one is willing to confess, can the other one still supervise the prosecutor?
Then Lederman's main subject is why "it is very unlikely that Mueller is investigating whether the removal was unlawful".
First he tosses out the argument that "it’s not obvious that Mueller would have much to do in investigating that question other than to question Trump himself", which is largely a restatement of the above. (So, what, when he's ready he would question Trump and at that time (on this argument) Rosenstein would consider recusal?)
But Lederman's larger point is he "would be very surprised if Mueller investigates whether a President’s exercise of his at-will removal power" would meet the legal standard. First there's some backing and filling about how some would argue that exercise of a granted power can never be unlawful… but Lederman agrees it can be. (See Charles Black's famous hypothetical of if the President states he'll be pardoning all police officers who kill black people.) So what's the problem? Lederman restates again "there are not really any serious factual disputes at issue" so that "the only function" Mueller could serve is to state his legal opinion about whether Presidential powers are unconstrained by general laws, which would then be contested in the courts.
Look though, the prosecutor is actually reporting both factual and legal assessments to prosecute. If he doesn't "state his opinion" about that, the entire matter doesn't reach the courts to be contested. He serves the function of letting that contest occur, on the basis of factual findings.
(Lederman also talks about the question of whether the serving President can be indicted or prosecuted, but this is a red herring -- as he admits Mueller would still investigate "where culpability does turn on serious, disputed factual questions, not so that the President might face criminal charges now, but for possible purposes of post-term prosecution and/or impeachment.")
It all turns on this single point, that there are no serious and disputed factual questions. Lederman seems to hold the position that (aside from the presidency in play) Mueller could file charges tomorrow and immediately rest his case with what he has from CNN. I actually think that's a fair take on Lederman's argument, even though it sounds ridiculous that way. The more I reread this sentence the more I boggle: investigating could have "no practical impact" versus not? Having court fights over the matter would be the same as not having them?
"Therefore, the only function that would be served by a publicly stated conclusion by Mueller that the removal violated Section 1505 or section 1512(c)(2) would be the revelation of Mueller’s own considered view on the contested legal question of whether such an at-will removal can ever amount to a violation of those statutes–a statement of law that would have no practical impact (and that would inevitably be contested by others)."
Recall, Rosenstein wrote the letter that Trump used as a pretext for firing Comey. Is reported that he wrote this letter with awareness that Trump wanted this to quash the FBI's Russia counterintelligence investigation. You'd think Mueller would have Rosenstein as a witness.
One can imagine pragmatic reasons why Rosenstein might think that staying in the role actually protects the investigation, but utilitarian arguments are of little weight on a recusal question. And it's hard to imagine either Rosenstein or Mueller would want any kind of stretching of normal ethics rules under the circumstance. They must think they have solid reasons why this is fine.
Here's one proposal from a June 2017 article: so maybe Mueller's not investigating Comey's firing. Nobody with knowledge has stated that he is.
https://www.justsecurity.org/42249/basis-rod-rosenstein-recuse/
I came to post it here, but… reading it over again, I'm not a lawyer but Lederman's argument seems to me to have some soft spots. Any lawyer in the house? In the end I am still very puzzled what's going on with Rosenstein.
Lederman argues, first, even if Mueller is investigating Comey's firing, he doesn't need Rosenstein's testimony. He needs to establish a motive meeting the standard of "corrupt". But Trump already stated motive to CNN and to the Russians, Lederman argues, and Rosenstein would just confirm. I don't think this makes sense, though. First, if you were prosecuting a case of this seriousness, wouldn't you want all the evidence in your favor? But a more fundamental issue with the argument -- can you seriously finesse the need to recuse by playing "speak no evil, hear no evil" with a witness? That seems absurd. If two people robbed a bank, and one is willing to confess, can the other one still supervise the prosecutor?
Then Lederman's main subject is why "it is very unlikely that Mueller is investigating whether the removal was unlawful".
First he tosses out the argument that "it’s not obvious that Mueller would have much to do in investigating that question other than to question Trump himself", which is largely a restatement of the above. (So, what, when he's ready he would question Trump and at that time (on this argument) Rosenstein would consider recusal?)
But Lederman's larger point is he "would be very surprised if Mueller investigates whether a President’s exercise of his at-will removal power" would meet the legal standard. First there's some backing and filling about how some would argue that exercise of a granted power can never be unlawful… but Lederman agrees it can be. (See Charles Black's famous hypothetical of if the President states he'll be pardoning all police officers who kill black people.) So what's the problem? Lederman restates again "there are not really any serious factual disputes at issue" so that "the only function" Mueller could serve is to state his legal opinion about whether Presidential powers are unconstrained by general laws, which would then be contested in the courts.
Look though, the prosecutor is actually reporting both factual and legal assessments to prosecute. If he doesn't "state his opinion" about that, the entire matter doesn't reach the courts to be contested. He serves the function of letting that contest occur, on the basis of factual findings.
(Lederman also talks about the question of whether the serving President can be indicted or prosecuted, but this is a red herring -- as he admits Mueller would still investigate "where culpability does turn on serious, disputed factual questions, not so that the President might face criminal charges now, but for possible purposes of post-term prosecution and/or impeachment.")
It all turns on this single point, that there are no serious and disputed factual questions. Lederman seems to hold the position that (aside from the presidency in play) Mueller could file charges tomorrow and immediately rest his case with what he has from CNN. I actually think that's a fair take on Lederman's argument, even though it sounds ridiculous that way. The more I reread this sentence the more I boggle: investigating could have "no practical impact" versus not? Having court fights over the matter would be the same as not having them?
"Therefore, the only function that would be served by a publicly stated conclusion by Mueller that the removal violated Section 1505 or section 1512(c)(2) would be the revelation of Mueller’s own considered view on the contested legal question of whether such an at-will removal can ever amount to a violation of those statutes–a statement of law that would have no practical impact (and that would inevitably be contested by others)."
Post has attachment
Mark Zuckerberg Essentially Launched Facebook’s Reelection Campaign
https://search.app.goo.gl/Hwye
Shared from my Google feed
https://search.app.goo.gl/Hwye
Shared from my Google feed
Wait while more posts are being loaded































