<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://subtbiol.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">9</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F9D0807C-3C52-5A33-8AB6-FB2607A29353</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E14246FD-79C0-4B14-A52F-3F6A3D7ECCA8</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Subterranean Biology</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">SB</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1768-1448</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-2615</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">177524</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Demospongiae</subject>
          <subject>Haplosclerida</subject>
          <subject>Invertebrata</subject>
          <subject>Porifera</subject>
          <subject>Spongillidae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Faunistics &amp; Distribution</subject>
          <subject>Molecular systematics</subject>
          <subject>Systematics</subject>
          <subject>Taxonomy</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Americas</subject>
          <subject>Mexico</subject>
          <subject>North America</subject>
          <subject>Yucatan</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>New discovery of the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759) in cenote ecosystems of Yucatan, Mexico: Morphological and molecular insights</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Hernández-Solis</surname>
            <given-names>Pablo Alberto</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9052-5315</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Gómez-Bretón</surname>
            <given-names>Víctor Eduardo</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">veduardogb@comunidad.unam.mx</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1116-618X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>de la Cruz-Fernández</surname>
            <given-names>Dalia Angélica</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-2688</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Simões</surname>
            <given-names>Nuno</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7490-3147</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A5">5</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Docencia e Investigación Sisal (UMDI-Sisal), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (FC, UNAM), Yucatán, C.P. 97356, Mexico</addr-line>
        <institution>Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (FC, UNAM)</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Yucatán</addr-line>
        <country>Mexico</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Laboratorio de Ingeniería y Procesos Costeros, Instituto de Ingeniería, Unidad Sisal, UNAM, Yucatán, Mexico</addr-line>
        <institution>Laboratorio de Ingeniería y Procesos Costeros, Instituto de Ingeniería</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Yucatán</addr-line>
        <country>Mexico</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Límnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UMDI-Sisal, Hunucmá, Yucatán, Mexico</addr-line>
        <institution>Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Límnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Yucatán</addr-line>
        <country>Mexico</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A4">
        <label>4</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Laboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera (LANRESC), Laboratorios Nacionales, CONACYT, Sisal, C.P. 97356, Mexico</addr-line>
        <institution>Harte Research Institute, Texas A and M University-Corpus Christi</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Corpus Christi</addr-line>
        <country>United States of America</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A5">
        <label>5</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">International Chair for Coastal and Marine Studies, Harte Research Institute, Texas A and M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, 78412, USA</addr-line>
        <institution>Laboratorio Nacional de Resiliencia Costera (LANRESC)</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Sisal</addr-line>
        <country>Mexico</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Víctor Eduardo Gómez-Bretón (<ext-link xlink:href="mailto:eddezth019@gmail.com" ext-link-type="uri">eddezth019@gmail.com</ext-link>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Renata Manconi</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>55</volume>
      <fpage>109</fpage>
      <lpage>136</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/484AE66F-1A66-59B5-BDD9-7CAA2B326BCA">484AE66F-1A66-59B5-BDD9-7CAA2B326BCA</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/F54F6BD5-A6D1-4172-AAD4-57DE2DAF5069">F54F6BD5-A6D1-4172-AAD4-57DE2DAF5069</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>01</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Pablo Alberto Hernández-Solis, Víctor Eduardo Gómez-Bretón, Dalia Angélica de la Cruz-Fernández, Nuno Simões</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/F54F6BD5-A6D1-4172-AAD4-57DE2DAF5069</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>For over five decades, the biodiversity of freshwater sponges from Yucatan cenotes has remained largely unexplored. Scientific documentation is limited to studies from 1936 and 1968, which highlights a significant knowledge gap. It is here reported the presence of the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in the Sabak-Ha and Suhem cenotes of Yucatan, Mexico. It is provided detailed descriptions of the spicules to accurately characterize morphology and ease comparison with other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species. Additionally, we conducted molecular analyses using DNA sequences from the ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions, as well as partial 18S and 28S sequences, to determine phylogenetic relationships within the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Spongillidae">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> family. DNA sequences from both cenotes were nearly identical to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> GenBank sequences (&lt;3% divergence), confirming species identification. Spicule analysis revealed gemmuloscleres birotules with shafts densely covered by spines as long as the rotular rays as recorded throughout the entire geographic range of this species in both lentic and lotic water bodies. This study expands our knowledge of the diversity and distribution of freshwater sponges in Yucatan cenotes, where only <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> had been previously reported. Our results lay the groundwork for future research on cenote sponge biodiversity in this unique karst ecosystem and underscore the importance of integrating molecular and morphological data for accurate species identification.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Biodiversity</kwd>
        <kwd>Karst environment</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>Sabak-Ha Cenote</kwd>
        <kwd>Sinkholes</kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Spongillida">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Spongillidae">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>Suhem Cenote</kwd>
        <kwd>Yucatan Peninsula</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Hernández-Solis PA, Gómez-Bretón VE, de la Cruz-Fernández DA, Simões N (2026) New discovery of the freshwater sponge <italic>Ephydatia fluviatilis</italic> (Linnaeus, 1759) in cenote ecosystems of Yucatan, Mexico: Morphological and molecular insights. Subterranean Biology 55: 109–136. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Cenotes are aquatic ecosystems with characteristic karst formations located throughout the Yucatan Peninsula, they represent Mexico’s hydrogeological heritage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Beddows et al. 2007</xref>). These systems originate from the dissolution of limestone and the subsequent collapse of underground cavities’ roofs. These cavities are fed by rainfall infiltration through calcareous soil structures, forming circular depressions connected to aquifers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">Schmitter-Soto et al. 2002</xref>). The interaction between fresh and marine water generates chemical and biological stratification in these environments, as a result, cenotes constitute biodiversity reservoirs with high levels of endemism. These formations function as main connectors to the aquifer, housing highly specialized biological communities such as stygobiont crustaceans and fish adapted to low-luminosity and low-oxygen conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Camargo-Guerra et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Álvarez et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Angyal et al. 2021</xref>). This environment provides invaluable information about the dynamics of groundwater and the biogeochemical processes occurring in these ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">Socki et al. 2002</xref>).</p>
      <p>Recent studies of aquatic biodiversity in cenotes main focus is on crustacean taxa, including <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subclass" reg="Copepoda">Copepoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Remipedia">Remipedia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Ostracoda">Ostracoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Thermosbaenacea">Thermosbaenacea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Mysida">Mysida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Amphipoda">Amphipoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Isopoda">Isopoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subphylum" reg="Decapoda">Decapoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">Suárez-Morales and Reid 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Boxshall et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Álvarez et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Angyal et al. 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2020a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Chávez-Solís et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Espinasa et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Chávez-Solís et al. 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Liévano-Beltrán and Simões 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Macario-González et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Jaime et al. 2025</xref>), also fish from the families <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Cichlidae">Cichlidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Poeciliidae">Poeciliidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Characidae">Characidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Pimelodidae">Pimelodidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Synbranchidae">Synbranchidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Medina-González et al. 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Camargo-Guerra et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">Schmitter-Soto 2020</xref>), as well as gastropod mollusks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Grego et al. 2019</xref>) and photosynthetic microorganisms, particularly cyanobacteria and phytoplankton have been studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Águila et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Díaz-Hernández et al. 2023</xref>). However, for other taxa, such as sponges (Phylum <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), there has been a significant gap in research regarding the updating of their species richness, ecology and distribution in cenotes.</p>
      <p>The first sponge species documented in cenotes from Yucatan were <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lacustris">lacustris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, which is now recognized as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Potts, 1882), both were identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Old (1936b)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek (1968)</xref> later described a new species, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, from a different cenote than those studied by Old (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Subsequent research by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Poirrier (1976)</xref> confirmed that the material previously identified as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lacustris">lacustris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in cenotes was actually <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Consequently, all specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lacustris">lacustris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> found in Yucatan Peninsula cenotes were reassigned to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Since these early studies, the biodiversity of freshwater sponges in Yucatan Peninsula cenotes has remained largely unexplored.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Spicular morphometry of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> specimens by cenote. Measurements are presented as mean (minimum-maximum) values for oxeas length × width. For birotules gemmuloscleres, measurements include length × shaft width × rotule diameter.</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Cenote</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Specimen</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Smooth oxeas I (μm)</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Smooth oxeas II (μm)</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Spiny oxeas (μm)</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Birotules (μm)</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Sabak-Ha</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">316.11 (274.74–359.11) × 15.9 (14.51–17.66)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">184.18 (168.67–199.68) × 5.04 (4.93–5.14)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">110.71 (88.92–132.51) × 10.13 (9.1–11.17)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">53.32 (50.47–55.39) × 8.67 (6.81–10.15) × 24.43 (21.43–31.74)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Sabak-Ha</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref>)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">335.07 (309.89–365.42) × 18.17 (15.97–19.71)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">172.2 (167.94–176.45) × 4.8 (4.67–4.93)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not found</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">57.93 (44.65–72.96) × 8.31 (5.24–9.9) × 22.75 (21.33–23.54)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Suhem</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref>)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">328.13 (243.28–373.53) × 13.19 (10.09–15.85)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">161.29 (147.27–175.3) × 4.25 (3.77–4.73)</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not found</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">37.74 (32.66–43.15) × 5.61 (4.64–6.96) × 22.92 (19.18–26.18)</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Description, location and spicular diversity of sponges reported in Yucatan Cenotes, Mexico. Records and descriptions obtained from: <sup>1</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Old (1936b)</xref>, <sup>2</sup><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek (1968)</xref>. The spicules are presented with average length measurements. Spicule drawings for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were made based on the illustrations descriptions by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Old (1936b)</xref>. Drawings depicting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were rendered directly from specimens examined in the current study.</p>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                <bold>Species</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                <bold>External description</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                <bold>Cenote registration</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="3">
                <bold>Spicules</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Oxeas</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Birotules</bold>
              </th>
              <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <bold>Microscleres</bold>
              </th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Potts, 1882)</td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Sponge encrusting, thin, texture very loose, forming no tangible skeleton.<sup>1</sup></td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><bold>Dzadz Aguada</bold><sup>1</sup> (10 km southwest of Chichen Itzá), Yucatán, México</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">260 µm</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">90 µm</td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i001.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564536.jpg"/>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i002.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564537.jpg"/>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Penney &amp; Racek, 1968)</td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Sponge irregular, and more or less massive cushions, surface smooth.<sup>2</sup></td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><bold>Xtoloc Cenote</bold><sup>2</sup> (20.68°N, -88.56°W), <bold>Xanaba Cenote Grande</bold><sup>1</sup> (8 km southwest of Chichen Itzá), <bold>Xanaba Cenote</bold><sup>1</sup> (8 km southeast of Chichen Itzá), <bold>Dzadz Aguada</bold><sup>1</sup>, Yucatán, México</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">310–410 µm</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65–86 µm</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">68–123 µm</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i003.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564538.jpg"/>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i004.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564539.jpg"/>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i005.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564540.jpg"/>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759)</td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Sponge massive, encrusting, often forming a discoidal growth.</td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><bold>Sabak-Ha Cenote</bold> (20.58°N, -89.58°W). <bold>Suhem Cenote</bold> (20.64°N, -89.40°W), Yucatán, México</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">147–365 µm</td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44–72 µm</td>
              <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i006.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564541.jpg"/>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                <inline-graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-i007.jpg" xlink:type="simple" id="oo_1564542.jpg"/>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Mexico spans both the Nearctic and Neotropical regions, there, approximately 10 species of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Spongillidae">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) have been documented across various aquatic ecosystems, including lakes, lagoons, and rivers in the country’s central and northern areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ehrenberg 1841</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Potts 1885a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">1885b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Arndt 1933</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Zorrilla 1935</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Old 1936a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Martínez 1940</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Rioja 1940a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">1940b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">1940c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">Rioja and Herrera 1952</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Rioja 1953</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bushnell 1971</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Manconi and Pronzato 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Carballo et al. 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Gómez et al. 2019</xref>). In contrast, there are only two reports of marine sponges in cenotes from Quintana Roo, specifically those located near the coast with an influx of seawater, one from the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Xestospongia">Xestospongia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">Suárez-Moo et al. 2024</xref>), and the marine endemic species <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Amphibleptula">Amphibleptula</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="aaktun">aaktun</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from the anchialine Aerolito cenote (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Gómez et al. 2021</xref>). Notably, these marine sponges do not belong to the order <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Spongillida">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, which comprises predominantly freshwater species. Additionally, an unidentified sponge was recorded in Los Sabinos Cave in San Luis Potosí in the northern part of Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Legendre et al. 2023</xref>). Overall, the knowledge of freshwater sponges in Mexican subterranean ecosystems is extremely limited compared to other freshwater habitats, where they have been studied more extensively.</p>
      <p>The genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lamouroux, 1816, is included among the freshwater sponges reported in Mexico. There are documented old records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Potts, 1888) in lacustrine ecosystems, such as Lakes Xochimilco and Pátzcuaro in central Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Potts 1885b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Zorrilla 1935</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Old 1936a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek 1968</xref>). However, there are no recent status updates of this genus in Mexico. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is a cosmopolitan genus widely distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere and present in the Southern Hemisphere as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Manconi and Pronzato 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Manconi and Pronzato 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Rasbold et al. 2023</xref>). These sponges primarily colonize rocky substrates and tree trunks in the shallow waters of ponds, rivers, lakes, lagoons and still bodies of water (lentic habitats) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Muricy et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Nicacio and Pinheiro 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Evans and Montagnes 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Gost et al. 2023</xref>). There, they play important ecological roles in water filtration, food webs, and symbiotic interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Hall et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Saxena 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Giudice and Rizzo 2024</xref>). Their extensive distribution and remarkable ability to thrive in diverse habitats make them particularly valuable for evolutionary and paleolimnological studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Harrison 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Manconi and Pronzato 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Pisera et al. 2016</xref>). Considering the lack of updated information on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Mexican ecosystems, despite its ecological significance and scientific value, it is crucial to conduct new surveys to document its current distribution patterns.</p>
      <p>This study documents the presence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in two cenotes in Yucatán, Mexico, using morphological by both Light Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Light Microscopy">LM</abbrev>) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>) and molecular analyses to clarify its taxonomic identity and systematic position, including the investigation of diagnostic microcharacters. Our findings represent the first record of this species in subterranean freshwater ecosystems of the region and the first update for Mexico in over 80 years since its documentation in Lake Xochimilco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Rioja 1940a</xref>). This research expands current knowledge of sponge biodiversity in cenote environments, updates the known distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and highlights its capacity to colonize diverse habitats. Furthermore, it provides a foundation for future studies on the ecology and biogeography of freshwater sponges in cenote ecosystems.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Sampling sites" id="sec4">
        <title>Sampling sites</title>
        <p>Sabak-Ha Cenote is located at the municipality of Sacalum in Yucatan, Mexico (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">20.5801°N, 89.5881°W</named-content>), while Suhem Cenote is located at the municipality of Pixya in Yucatan, Mexico (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">20.6403°N, 89.4031°W</named-content>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). Both are open-type cenotes (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">33E369A9-8576-5EDC-9DAA-5FBB6250DA5A</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in cenote ecosystems of Yucatan, Mexico. <bold>A</bold> records in Yucatan Cenotes: Sabak-Ha (green point) and Suhem (red point). The record of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> at Xtoloc Cenote is also shown (yellow square) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek 1968</xref>). Blue points indicate cenote locations. Gray area represents Mérida city (Mid), the capital city of Yucatan. The sky-blue area represents the protected natural area “Reserva Estatal Geohidrológica Anillo de Cenotes” (SDS 2013) <bold>B</bold> close-up of the Chichen Itzá area (brown triangle) illustrating the potential locations of cenotes where <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Old (1936b)</xref> documented <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The red line indicates a limit of 10 km southwest of Chichen Itzá, where <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">R.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was recorded in the Dzadz Aguada. Light blue and green lines represent areas 8 km southwest and southeast, respectively of Chichen Itzá, where <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was documented in Xanaba Cenote (southeast) and Xanaba Cenote Grande (southwest). Surrounding cenotes are also displayed: X’Tikinka (XTk), Usil (Usl), X’Jotun (XJt), X’Tojil (XTl), X’Katún (XKn), X’Tohil (XTh), Ticimul (Tcm), Nicte-Ha (NtH) and Popola (Ppl) <bold>C</bold> a close-up view of the area surrounding Sabak-Ha Cenote (Sbk). Nearby settlements (black areas) are labeled in black: Mucuyché (Mcy) and Yunkú (Ynk), with regional cenotes designated in blue: Mucuyché (McyC), Yaal Utzil (Ylt), San Marco (SnM), Crucero (Crc). The gray line depicts the local road network <bold>D</bold> a close-up view of the area surrounding Suhem Cenote (Shm). Nearby settlements (black areas) are labeled in black: Telchaquillo (Tlc) and Pixya (Pxy), with regional cenotes designated in blue: Uhua (Uhu), Burro (Brr), Burro I (BrI), Caldero (Cld), Nah-Yah (NhY), Cruz Chen (CrC), Noh-Mozón (NMz), Ti’Muul (Tml) and Ti’Muul 2 (Tml2). The gray line depicts the local road network.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g001.jpg" id="oo_1564527.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564527</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">3F229C71-D51B-5305-886D-043859104D71</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Cenote Sabak-Ha in Sacalum, Yucatan. <bold>A</bold> external view of the cenote <bold>B</bold> general view of cenote wall at 11 m depth in the organic matter layer where the sponges (indicated with arrows) were found <bold>C</bold> general view of cenote wall in clear water zone at 35 m depth.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g002.jpg" id="oo_1564528.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564528</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">C84DE500-8684-5798-8EC5-06210AE65C70</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Morphological and size variations in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Sabak-Ha Cenote. <bold>A</bold> typically discoidal form, sponges in shaded areas at 8 m depth present a pink coloration and soft texture <bold>B</bold> growth form adapting to substrata instead of the typical discoidal form at 6 m depth <bold>C</bold> sponge <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 in lighted areas present yellow to green color and a slightly harder texture, collected at 4 m depth <bold>D</bold> sponge <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671 collected at 11 m depth. Scale bars: 2 cm (<bold>A</bold>); 1 cm (<bold>B</bold>); 2 cm (<bold>C</bold>); 4 cm (<bold>D</bold>).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g003.jpg" id="oo_1564529.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564529</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">4718DE8E-3614-517C-A2B8-16595BD7CFD5</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Suhem Cenote in Pixya, Yucatan. <bold>A</bold> external view of the cenote entrance <bold>B</bold> panoramic view of the cenote bottom at 3 m depth <bold>C</bold> detailed view of the rocky wall at 4 m depth showing sponge specimen locations (indicated by arrows delimiting a typical rounded area).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g004.jpg" id="oo_1564530.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564530</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Sabak-Ha is 60 m long and 30 m wide, with a recorded depth of 120 m, although its true depth is unknown (SDS 2024). From the surface to an average depth of 15 m, Sabak-Ha has a layer of organic matter with extremely low visibility where the sponge has been found attached to its walls, while no sponges have been found in the crystal-clear waters below this layer. The depth of Suhem ranges from 4 m to around 35 m at its deepest point and is a popular site for tourist activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cenoteando 2025</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Sampling and identification" id="sec5">
        <title>Sampling and identification</title>
        <p>Sponges were collected in both cenotes by SCUBA (Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus) and the specimens were placed into the national collection “Colección Nacional del Phylum <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> – Gerardo Green” (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev></bold>) at the Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (<bold><abbrev content-type="institution" xlink:title="Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México">UNAM</abbrev></bold>). In Sabak-Ha, four samples from four individual sponges were collected at depths of 4 m, 6 m, 8 m and 11 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). All samples were analyzed using Light Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Light Microscopy">LM</abbrev>). Two specimens, corresponding to the light (<abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670) and dark (<abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671) morphotypes, were deposited in the <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev> and were used for spicule measurements and Scanning Electron Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>) imaging. Three samples were submitted for molecular sequencing, although one failed to yield usable results. In Suhem, samples from three individual sponges were collected at depths of 4 m, 4.7 m and 5.3 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). All samples were analyzed by <abbrev xlink:title="Light Microscopy">LM</abbrev>; due to their morphological similarity, only one specimen (<abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673) was deposited in the <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev> and selected for molecular sequencing. All samples were fixed and preserved in alcohol (96%). Sponges were photographed <italic>in situ</italic> (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">2D28AD5E-BB3C-5DEA-B046-2E40AEB29744</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Morphological and size variations in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Suhem Cenote. Specimens collected at depths of 4 m (<bold>A</bold>), 4.7 m (<bold>B</bold>), and 5.3 m (<bold>C</bold>) <bold>C</bold> this photography belongs to the collected sponge <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673. Scale bars: 1 cm (<bold>A, B</bold>); 4 cm (<bold>C</bold>).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g005.jpg" id="oo_1564531.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564531</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Small sponge fragments were manually cut and prepared for detailed microscopic analysis and examination of the spicules arrangement within the skeletal architecture. The procedure for the Scanning Electron Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>) observation followed the methodological standards established by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Hooper (2003)</xref>. Spicules and gemmules were cleaned with nitric acid and exhaustively washed with distilled water to remove organic material and allow detailed examination. Sponge fragments were hand-sectioned for the analysis of spicule arrangement within the skeletal architecture. For Light Microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Light Microscopy">LM</abbrev>), cleaned spicules and gemmules were mounted on glass slides using Canada balsam to ensure permanent preservation, whereas skeletal sections were embedded in Entellan® resin. For scanning electron microscopy (<abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev>), cleaned spicules were mounted on aluminum stubs, and coated with gold. Spicule dimensions were determined by measuring fifteen representative spicules from each morphological category, and results were reported as average length and width, including minimum and maximum values.</p>
        <p>The morphological identification of the sponges followed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Manconi and Pronzato (2002)</xref> for genus-level classification, and the descriptions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Potts (1888)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek (1968)</xref> for species-level identification. The systematic classification adheres to the authoritative World <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de Voogd et al. 2024</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Molecular analysis" id="sec6">
        <title>Molecular analysis</title>
        <p>DNA was extracted from 96% ethanol-preserved sponge samples collected in this study, two from Cenote Sabak-Ha (samples taken at two different times), and one sample from Cenote Suhem, the extraction was performed using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and Tissue Kit.</p>
        <p>For amplification primers were selected according to sequences of freshwater sponges from GenBank, and studies have shown that it has a higher variability in all demosponge subclasses. The primers used were RA2 (5’- GTC CCT GCC CTT TGT ACA CA -3’) and ITS2.2 (5’- CCT GGT TAG TTT CTT TTC CTC CGC – 3’), the amplified fragments would thus include ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and small parts of the 18S and 28S regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">Wörheide 1998</xref>). The cycle parameters were initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR-products were run in a 1.2% agarose gel to corroborate the positive amplification. The sequences of cenote sponges obtained in this study are deposited in GenBank (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</ext-link>) with the accession numbers <ext-link xlink:href="PX492551" ext-link-type="gen">PX492551</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="PX492552" ext-link-type="gen">PX492552</ext-link> and <ext-link xlink:href="PX492553" ext-link-type="gen">PX492553</ext-link>.</p>
        <p>The obtained sequences were assembled and edited with Geneious Prime 2025.2.2 (<ext-link xlink:href="https://www.geneious.com" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.geneious.com</ext-link>). The assignment of the sequences obtained was performed using the BLAST check on NCBI GenBank (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/</ext-link>). Sequences were initially aligned using Muscle on Geneious under default parameters and adjusted manually, including some available sequences of related freshwater sponges available from GenBank, resulting in a data matrix of 21 samples and 813 bp, including sequences of cenote sponge and members of the family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Spongillidae">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Based on the latest studies, we used <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="lacustris">lacustris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><ext-link xlink:href="EF151944" ext-link-type="gen">EF151944</ext-link>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Penney &amp; Racek, 1968) <ext-link xlink:href="EF151952" ext-link-type="gen">EF151952</ext-link> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trochospongilla">Trochospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Veidoyský, 1883) <ext-link xlink:href="PP853641" ext-link-type="gen">PP853641</ext-link> as outgroups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Itskovich et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Itskovich et al. 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Gómez et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Zhao et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
        <p>Phylogenetic analyses were performed by Maximum Likelihood (<abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev>) using PhyML (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Guindon et al. 2010</xref>) and Bayesian Inference (<abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev>) using MrBayes 3.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Ronquist et al. 2012</xref>). For the <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> analysis, the GTR+G+I model was selected as the best-fitting model. Node support was estimated by bootstrap resampling with 500 replicates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Felsenstein 1985</xref>). Bayesian analyses were run with four Markov chains for 1,100,000 generations, sampling every 200 generations, using the GTR+G+I model selected by JModelTest 2.1.10. program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Darriba et al. 2012</xref>). The first 25% of sampled trees were discarded as burn-in. Convergence was assessed by examining the average standard deviation of split frequencies, which fell below 0.01. Additionally, parameter stationarity was verified using Tracer v1.7, ensuring that Effective Sample Size values for all parameters exceeded 200.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec7">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Systematics" id="sec8">
        <title>Systematics</title>
        <p>
          <bold>Phylum <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Grant, 1836</bold>
        </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Class <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Demospongiae">Demospongiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Sollas, 1885</bold>
        </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Subclass <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subclass" reg="Heteroscleromorpha">Heteroscleromorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Cárdenas, Pérez &amp; Boury-Esnault, 2012</bold>
        </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Order <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Spongillida">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Manconi &amp; Pronzato, 2002</bold>
        </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Spongillidae">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Gray, 1867</bold>
        </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lamouroux, 1816</bold>
        </p>
        <tp:taxon-treatment>
          <tp:treatment-meta>
            <kwd-group>
              <label>Taxon classification</label>
              <kwd>
                <named-content content-type="order">Spongillida</named-content>
              </kwd>
              <kwd>
                <named-content content-type="family">Spongillidae</named-content>
              </kwd>
            </kwd-group>
          </tp:treatment-meta>
          <tp:nomenclature>
            <tp:taxon-name><object-id content-type="arpha">2C7FBF6B-6C3A-59A3-B13A-94EF277788FF</object-id>
                    		<tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part>
                    	</tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-authority>(Linnaeus, 1759)</tp:taxon-authority>
            <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figs 3</xref>
            <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">, 5</xref>
          </tp:nomenclature>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Synonymy and references">
            <title>Synonymy and references.</title>
            <p><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Clypeatula">Clypeatula</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cooperensis">cooperensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Peterson &amp; Addis, 2000, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="chui">chui</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Gee, 1926, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="hastifera">hastifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rezvoj, 1930, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="intha">intha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Annandale, 1918, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="teberdana">teberdana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Rezvoj, 1928, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraspecific-rank">var.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="variety" reg="capensis">capensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
 Kirkpatrick, 1907, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraspecific-rank">var.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="variety" reg="himalayensis">himalayensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Annandale, 1912, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="goriaevii">goriaevii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Swartschewsky, 1901, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Meyenia">Meyenia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759), <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Meyenia">Meyenia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraspecific-rank">var.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="variety" reg="angustibirotulata">angustibirotulata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Carter, 1885, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Meyenia">Meyenia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="infraspecific-rank">var.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="variety" reg="gracilis">gracilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Carter, 1885, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Meyenia">Meyenia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mexicana">mexicana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Potts, 1885, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Linnaeus, 1759, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pulvinata">pulvinata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Lamarck, 1816, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sceptrifera">sceptrifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Bowerbank, 1874, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="stagnalis">stagnalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Dawson, 1875.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Type locality">
            <title>Type locality.</title>
            <p>The Netherlands, Western Palearctic Region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek 1968</xref>).</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Material examined">
            <title>Material examined.</title>
            <p>• <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670, Cenote Sabak-Ha, Sacalum, Yucatan, Mexico (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">20.5801°N, 89.5881°W</named-content>), 4 m deep, collected by Victor Eduardo Gómez Bretón, March 3<sup>rd</sup> 2024; • <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671, Cenote Sabak-Ha, Sacalum, Yucatan, Mexico (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">20.5801°N, 89.5881°W</named-content>), 11 m deep, collected by V. E. Gómez Bretón, March 3<sup>rd</sup> 2024; • <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673, Cenote Suhem, Pixya, Yucatan, Mexico (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">20.6403°N, 89.4031°W</named-content>), 5.3 m deep, collected by V. E. Gómez Bretón, March 29<sup>th</sup> 2025.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Distribution">
            <title>Distribution.</title>
            <p>Canada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Dawson 1875</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Ricciardi and Reiswig 1993</xref>), China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Gee 1926</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B117">Zhang 1948</xref>), Himalaya (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Annandale 1912</xref>), Estonia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Roovere et al. 2006</xref>), Germany (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Linnaeus 1759</xref>), France (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B112">Topsent (1930)</xref>), Ireland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">Stephens 1920</xref>), Italy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Cardone 2014</xref>), Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Potts 1885a</xref>), Myanmar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Annandale 1918</xref>), Netherlands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B114">Vorstman 1954</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B113">Van Soest 2025</xref>), Poland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Linnaeus 1759</xref>), South Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Kirkpatrick 1907</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Manconi 2008</xref>), Sweden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Linnaeus 1759</xref>), United Kingdom (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Evans and Montagnes 2019</xref>), United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lauer and Spacie 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Manconi and Pronzato 2016</xref>), Russia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Schletterer and Eggers 2006</xref>), Spain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Gost et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="External description">
            <title>External description.</title>
            <p>In Sabak-Ha Cenote, the sponge exhibits a predominantly massive encrusting morphology, creating prominent mounded structures and frequently developing into distinctive discoidal formations. In contrast, specimens from the Suhem cenote present as diminutive, attenuated, and irregularly encrusting forms (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Smooth and porous texture. The consistency of the living sponge is fragile and easily brittle upon contact. Oscula not visible to the naked eye. Exhibiting two colors <italic>in vivo</italic>, greenish yellow in the presence of light and dull pinkish in its absence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Whitish color when preserved in alcohol.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Skeleton">
            <title>Skeleton.</title>
            <p>Forming paucispicular tracts, composed of 2–5 intersecting oxea spicules producing regular mesh (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6D</xref>). The tracts form an alveolate structure, clearly forming rounded meshes. Spongin is generally scarce but present in most tracts.</p>
            <fig id="F6">
              <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure6</object-id>
              <object-id content-type="arpha">FE5B9CA8-97F6-57A6-9F38-47B822A3CB1B</object-id>
              <label>Figure 6.</label>
              <caption>
                <p>Gemmule, spicules and skeletal architecture of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Sabak-Ha and Suhem Cenotes. <bold>A</bold> gemmule with visible birotules (Gml) <bold>B</bold> smooth oxeas <bold>C</bold> spiny oxeas exclusively from Sabak-Ha Cenote sampled sponges <bold>D</bold> skeletal network tracts (Tr) composed of oxeas (Ox), spongin (Sp) and alveolate cavities (Ac) by <abbrev xlink:title="Light Microscopy">LM</abbrev><bold>E</bold> spines (Sp) and microspines (Msp) of the birotules shaft by <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev><bold>F</bold> birotules gemmuloscleres by <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev><bold>G</bold> detail of a rotule (top view) by <abbrev xlink:title="Scanning Electron Microscopy">SEM</abbrev><bold>A</bold> taken from specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673 <bold>B–E, G</bold> taken from the specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 <bold>F</bold> taken from specimens <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 and <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671. Scale bars: 50 μm (<bold>A, B</bold>); 20 μm (<bold>C</bold>) 100 μm (<bold>D</bold>); 2 μm (<bold>E</bold>); 10 μm (<bold>F, G</bold>).</p>
              </caption>
              <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g006.jpg" id="oo_1564532.jpg">
                <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564532</uri>
              </graphic>
            </fig>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Gemmules">
            <title>Gemmules.</title>
            <p>Gemmules scarce and scattered, hemispherical measuring 200.56 (190.77–210.36) μm in diameter (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6A</xref>). Gemmules were observed exclusively in specimens from Suhem Cenote.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Spicules">
            <title>Spicules.</title>
            <p>Megascleres consist primarily of smooth oxeas that are slender and slightly curved at the midpoint, occurring in two distinct size categories. Oxeas I are the most common spicules in specimens from both cenotes, measuring 327.13 (243.28–373.53) μm × 15.15 (10.09–19.71) μm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6B</xref>). Oxeas II are much less frequent than type I and are noticeably shorter and thinner, measuring 172.55 (147.27–199.68) μm × 4.7 (3.77–5.14) μm. These measurements were obtained from the total number of spicules measured in specimens <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>), <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref>) from the Sabak-Ha Cenote and <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref>) from the Suhem Cenote.</p>
            <p>Additionally, smaller and less abundant spiny oxeas were observed; these are mostly straight and were found exclusively in specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 from the Sabak-Ha Cenote. They measure 110.71 (88.92–132.51) μm × 10.13 (9.10–11.17) μm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6C</xref>).</p>
            <p>Gemmuloscleres consist of birotules with spined shafts and rotules of nearly identical morphology at both extremities (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6F</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>), measuring 46.76 (32.66–72.96) μm × 7.04 (4.64–10.15) μm. The rotules have a diameter of 23.41 (19.18–31.74) μm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6G</xref>). This size range was obtained from the total number of gemmulosclere birotules measured in all three collected specimens: <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 and <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671 from the Sabak-Ha Cenote, and <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673 from the Suhem Cenote. Detailed measurements for each specimen are provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>.</p>
            <fig id="F7">
              <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure7</object-id>
              <object-id content-type="arpha">A9C28EE3-26DE-583A-AC30-2466CC7A1C12</object-id>
              <label>Figure 7.</label>
              <caption>
                <p>Comparison of birotules from sponges collected in Sabak-Ha Cenote (<bold>A, B</bold>) and Suhem Cenote (<bold>C, D</bold>). Birotule <bold>A</bold> corresponds to specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>), and birotule <bold>B</bold> to specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2671 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref>). Birotule <bold>C</bold> corresponds to specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2673 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5C</xref>), while birotule <bold>D</bold> corresponds to a sponge from Suhem not deposited in the <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev> collection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A</xref>). Scale bars: 10 μm.</p>
              </caption>
              <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g007.jpg" id="oo_1564533.jpg">
                <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564533</uri>
              </graphic>
            </fig>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Molecular results">
            <title>Molecular results.</title>
            <p>The molecular analyses using Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood methods yielded congruent topologies, revealing a well-supported monophyletic clade containing specimens together with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, confirming species-level identification (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>). Sequences from both cenotes (Sabak-Ha and Suhem) were identical in nucleotide composition, and BLAST searches against GenBank confirmed assignment to <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Spongillida">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with our samples differing by less than 3% from reference sequences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. This clade clustered as sister to a monophyletic group formed by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Heterorotula">Heterorotula</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Penney &amp; Racek, 1968) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Racekiela">Racekiela</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Bass &amp; Volkmer-Ribeiro, 1984), with both clades sister to the main <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> assemblage. The genera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eunapius">Eunapius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Gray, 1867) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Lamarck, 1816) were recovered as monophyletic, while <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trochospongilla">Trochospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remained unresolved.</p>
            <fig id="F8">
              <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure8</object-id>
              <object-id content-type="arpha">B27D1C7A-BDEE-5E84-AAAF-3430319B5F1C</object-id>
              <label>Figure 8.</label>
              <caption>
                <p>Tree topology of rDNA region (18s-ITS1-5.8-ITS2-28s) based on comparisons of 813 bp from 21 freshwater sponge samples, obtained by Bayesian Inference (MrBayes) and Maximum Likelihood (PhyML). The number at each node represents the <abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev> Posterior Probability, followed by <abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev> Bootstrap Values. The GenBank sequence accession code was included after each species name. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trochospongilla">Trochospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><ext-link xlink:href="PP853641" ext-link-type="gen">PP853641</ext-link> were used as outgroups. Taxon names of sequences obtained in this study are indicated in green.</p>
              </caption>
              <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g008.jpg" id="oo_1564534.jpg">
                <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564534</uri>
              </graphic>
            </fig>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Remarks">
            <title>Remarks.</title>
            <p>The morphological and molecular results strongly support the assignment of the specimens to the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. First, BLAST-based molecular analyses confirmed the identity of our specimens within the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Spongillidae">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> family, revealing that the samples present a divergence of less than 3% from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. This low genetic divergence is common in the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> group and indicates a very close relationship (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Zhao et al. 2023</xref>). The molecular assignment was solidified through phylogenetic reconstruction, where the trees obtained by Maximum Likelihood (<abbrev xlink:title="Maximum Likelihood">ML</abbrev>) and Bayesian Inference (<abbrev xlink:title="Bayesian Inference">BI</abbrev>) were congruent, demonstrating that the sponges from both cenotes consistently cluster together and form a robust clade alongside <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In this grouping, the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> group was positioned as a sister group to monophyletic clades composed of the genera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Heterorotula">Heterorotula</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Penney &amp; Racek, 1968) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Racekiela">Racekiela</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cresciscrystae">cresciscrystae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Gómez, Carballo, Cruz-Barraza &amp; Camacho-Cancino, 2019). This particular topology is notable as it is consistent with previous studies on <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Spongillida">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> phylogeny based on ITS sequences and underscores the taxonomic complexity of the group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Gómez et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Itskovich et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Zhao et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
            <p>Regarding morphology, the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is characterized by birotules with short shafts, rotules of equal diameter, and megasclere oxeas that may be either microspined or smooth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Manconi and Pronzato 2002</xref>), all features observed in our specimens. In addition, the morphology of the collected specimens is consistent with the bulbous and corrugated, flat encrustating and discoidal typical growth forms reported for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek 1968</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Pronzato and Manconi 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Lopp et al. 2007</xref>).</p>
            <p>In terms of spicule dimensions, the length of smooth oxeas I (243.28–373.53 µm) falls within the range reported in the original species description (210–400 µm) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek 1968</xref>). Notably, the specimen <abbrev xlink:title="Colección Nacional del Phylum Porifera – Gerardo Green">CNPGG</abbrev>-2670 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>) from Sabak-Ha also possessed uncommon, smaller, more heavily spined oxeas not previously documented in the literature. In addition, dimensions showed interpopulation variation, specimens from Sabak-Ha cenote exhibited longer birotules (44.65–72.96 µm) than the typical range for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (26–30 µm), while those from Suhem Cenote are more closely related to the expected range (32.66–43.15 µm) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). This variation suggests that site-specific environmental conditions within each cenote may influence spicule formation and growth, consistent with previous reports of this species sensitivity to changes in alkalinity and light intensity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Gost et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
            <p>About the presence of spines in birotules, some studies have revealed them as response to the water chemistry, spine development has been linked to habitats with elevated chloride concentrations and high alkalinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Poirrier et al. 1974</xref>), conditions characteristic of cenote ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Pérez-Ceballos et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Cruz-Sánchez et al. 2018</xref>). These conditions allow the spination in birotules of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in cenote ecosystems.</p>
            <p>In North America, in addition to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the species <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Potts, 1888), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="millsii">millsii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Potts, 1888), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="muelleri">muelleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Lieberkühn, 1856), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="subtilis">subtilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Weltner, 1895) have been reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Carter 1885</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Potts 1885b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Potts 1888</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">Weltner 1895</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">Smith 1918</xref>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). However, descriptions of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="millsii">millsii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="subtilis">subtilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remain outdated and have not been revised since their original descriptions. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was described as having large birotules with cylindrical or conical shafts bearing long spines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Potts 1888</xref>), while <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="millsii">millsii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> presents symmetrical birotules with nearly cylindrical shafts bearing a single median spine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Potts 1888</xref>). The identity of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="subtilis">subtilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> remains uncertain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">Weltner 1895</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Harrison 1979</xref>). In contrast, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="muelleri">muelleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is the only species with recent molecular and updated morphological data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Lopp et al. 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Kenny et al. 2020</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is morphologically similar to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="muelleri">muelleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, differing mainly in birotule shaft length and oxeas spination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Lopp et al. 2007</xref>), although their genetic relationship remains unclear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Zhao et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F9">
              <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/subtbiol.55.177524.figure9</object-id>
              <object-id content-type="arpha">56CD534D-CC0A-5F5E-93C4-5A91475CBBBB</object-id>
              <label>Figure 9.</label>
              <caption>
                <p>Distribution of six <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species across North America. Records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were obtained from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2025a), with historical records in Mexico from Pátzcuaro and Xochimilco Lakes documented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Rioja (1942)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek (1968)</xref>, respectively, and a recent record of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. in Nazas River by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Rodríguez-Ríos et al. (2024)</xref>. Records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="millsii">millsii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Potts (1888)</xref>, with additional <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> records from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Laubenfels (1932)</xref> and GBIF (2025b). Records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="muelleri">muelleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">Smith (1918)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Ricciardi and Reiswig (1993)</xref>, records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="subtilis">subtilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">Weltner (1895)</xref> and the record of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="facunda">facunda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> was from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Manconi and Pronzato (2005)</xref>.</p>
              </caption>
              <graphic xlink:href="subterranean_biology-55-109_article-177524__-g009.jpg" id="oo_1564535.jpg">
                <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1564535</uri>
              </graphic>
            </fig>
            <p>These limitations highlight gaps in species delimitation, as morphological differences are largely based on the presence or absence of spines on oxeas or birotule shafts. Given the wide distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> across freshwater habitats in the Northern Hemisphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Oscoz et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Lucentini et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Erpenbeck et al. 2020</xref>), integrative studies combining molecular and morphological data are required to improve species delimitation in this region and across the genus range (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Zhao et al. (2023)</xref> suggested that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> represents a species complex, with birotule shaft length being more informative than spine presence. Our morphological and molecular data support this view, indicating that shaft spines in Yucatan cenote populations reflect environmentally induced variation rather than species-level diagnostic characters.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
        </tp:taxon-treatment>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec9">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In Mexico, knowledge of the diversity and distribution of the freshwater sponge genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> has remained outdated and underexplored. Old records report the species <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Lake Xochimilco and Pátzcuaro (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Zorrilla 1935</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Old 1936a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Rioja 1942</xref>). Recently, the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Rodríguez-Ríos et al. (2024)</xref> reported a sponge of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Nazas River in Fernández Canyon, Lerdo, Durango; however, their study focused on insect larvae and the sponge species was not identified to species level. Therefore, our record of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fluviatilis">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in cenote ecosystems extends the distribution range, updates the morphological description and integrates the first molecular data for this species in Mexico.</p>
      <p>Earlier records are taxonomically problematic, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Zorrilla (1935)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Old (1936a)</xref> merely mentioned the presence of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Lake Xochimilco without providing formal descriptions, photographs, or illustrations to support identification. These authors variously identified specimens of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from this lake as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="subdivisa">subdivisa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Potts, 1888) (now recognized as a synonym of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="robusta">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="viridis">viridis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (a taxonomically uncertain designation), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">E.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (now reclassified as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Such inconsistencies underscore the considerable uncertainty that has historically characterized our knowledge of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Mexico.</p>
      <p>Recent taxonomic research examining freshwater sponge specimens collected during the last century has proven that historical identifications frequently require revision when subjected to contemporary molecular analysis and detailed morphological examination of spicules and gemmules. This need for taxonomic reassessment has been clearly demonstrated in studies of the genera <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Racekiela">Racekiela</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Bass &amp; Volkmer-Ribeiro, 1998) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Heteromeyenia">Heteromeyenia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Carballo et al. 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2021</xref>). Consequently, a comprehensive review and update of the reported occurrences of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species is essential to clarify the actual diversity and distribution of this genus in Mexico.</p>
      <p>Despite the potential taxonomic ambiguity in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species in Mexico, our study updates the biodiversity records of cenote sponges in Yucatan. Prior to this research, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> had not been documented in these ecosystems. With the inclusion of our records and the previously reported <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">Radiospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Old 1936b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Penney and Racek 1968</xref>), the number of known cenote sponge species has increased to three, each from a different genus. Additionally, two new cenotes were added to existing records, resulting in six cenote ecosystems with freshwater sponge populations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Given the high number of cenotes in Yucatan (POETY 2021), further undiscovered species are likely.</p>
      <p>Both previous and current studies consistently recorded sponges in open-type cenotes with vertical walls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Hall 1936</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Beddows et al. 2007</xref>), suggesting that these environments may favor sponge presence. These cenotes receive sufficient light to support primary productivity and associated microalgae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Godefroy et al. 2019</xref>). Light exposure may also explain the observed color variation, as greenish-yellow coloration in illuminated specimens is likely linked to photosynthetic symbionts, a phenomenon reported in marine and freshwater sponges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Lemloh et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Giudice and Rizzo 2024</xref>) and in other <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ephydatia">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Hustus et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
      <p>Future studies should aim to verify the records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Spongilla">S.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="cenota">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">R.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> documented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Old (1936b)</xref> in their original locations. These include Xanaba Cenote Grande, Xanaba Cenote, and Dzadz Aguada, which are currently referenced only by their near location from the archaeological site Chichen Itzá (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>), rendering their precise geographical positioning is uncertain. Specifically, the Xanaba cenotes lack entries in the existing cenote database (POETY 2021), while multiple cenotes named Dzadz Aguada are located in different regions from Old’s (1936b) original description. This geographic ambiguity prevented us from accurately representing <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Radiospongilla">R.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="crateriformis">crateriformis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> locations on our cenote sponge map (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). Instead, we provide an estimated reference point centered around Chichen Itzá, where these historical records might be situated.</p>
      <p>Finally, this study emphasizes the importance of documenting and recording sponge populations in cenote ecosystems of Yucatan. With sponges frequently being overlooked in biodiversity inventories of cenotes, there has been a significant information gap for over 40 years regarding this taxonomic group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cervantes-Martínez et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Mejía-Ortiz and Yáñez 2024</xref>). As a result, numerous fundamental aspects of sponge ecology and biology within these ecosystems remain unknown, creating valuable opportunities for future research. These research opportunities include investigating the specific environmental conditions that determine sponge presence and absence in cenotes, as well as understanding their spatiotemporal distribution patterns throughout the cenotes network in Yucatan.</p>
      <p>Research on freshwater sponges can provide important insights into water chemical conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Hill and Hill 2002</xref>), illustrate the evolutionary history of ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Erpenbeck et al. 2020</xref>), and offer valuable resources for biotechnological applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Keller-Costa et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Giudice and Rizzo 2024</xref>). Additionally, comprehensive sponge records will help complete the understanding of species diversity in cenotes, potentially supporting conservation efforts for these unique ecosystems. It is noteworthy that most of the cenotes where sponges have been reported are not located within the “Reserva Estatal Geohidrológica Anillo de Cenotes,” a Natural Protected Area (known in Spanish as ANP) established in 2013 (SDS 2013). Given this situation, it is imperative to intensify research efforts focused on understanding sponge populations together with their associated invertebrates, microalgae and microbiome in Yucatan’s cenote ecosystems.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We thank David Leonardo Alvarado González, Emmanuel Alvarado Mazum, and Susana Eunice Calva Pérez for their assistance with field work logistics, specimen collection, and sponge photography. We are also grateful to Susana Eunice Calva Pérez for proofreading and translating the manuscript. To Patricia Gómez from national collection “Colección Nacional del Phylum <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Porifera">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Gerardo Green-ICMyL” for reception and entering of the specimens. We also gratefully acknowledge Laura Elena Gómez Lizárraga from Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología-<abbrev content-type="institution" xlink:title="Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México">UNAM</abbrev> for her technical assistance with scanning electron microscopy imaging of spicules.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Annandale N (1912) Observations on the invertebrate fauna of the Kumaon Lakes, with special reference to the sponges and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Polyzoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. II. Systematic and geographical notes on the sponges and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Polyzoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Records of the Indian Museum 7: 137–139.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Annandale N (1918) Sponges, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Hydrozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Polyzoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> of the Inle Lake. Records of the Indian Museum 14: 75–78. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5962/bhl.part.18605" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.18605</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Águila B, Yanez-Montalvo A, Mercado-Juárez RA, Montejano GA, Becerra-Absalón I, Falcón LI (2022) Microbialites show a distinct cyanobacterial phylogenetic structure and functional redundancy in Bacalar lagoon and Cenote Azul sinkhole, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 98: 1–13. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/femsec/fiac039" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiac039</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Álvarez F, Iliffe TM, Benitez S, Brankovits D, Villalobos JL (2015) New records of anchialine fauna from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Check List 11(1): 1–10. <ext-link xlink:href="10.15560/11.1.1505" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.15560/11.1.1505</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Angyal D, Chávez-Solís EM, Magaña B, Balázs G, Simoes N (2018) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Mayaweckelia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">troglomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, a new subterranean amphipod species from Yucatán state, México (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Amphipoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Hadziidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). ZooKeys 735: 1–25. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/zookeys.735.21164" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.735.21164</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Angyal D, Chávez-Solís EM, Liévano-Beltrán LA, Magaña B, Simões N, Mascaró M (2020a) New distribution records of subterranean crustaceans from cenotes in Yucatan (Mexico). ZooKeys 911: 21–49. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/zookeys.911.47694" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.911.47694</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Angyal D, Simões N, Mascaró M (2020b) Updated checklist, historical overview and illustrated guide to the stygobiont <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Malacostraca</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Arthropoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subphylum">Crustacea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) species of Yucatan (Mexico). Subterranean Biology 36: 83–108. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/subtbiol.36.53558" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.36.53558</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Angyal D, Chávez-Solís EM, Liévano-Beltrán LA, Simoes N (2021) Quick identification guide to the subterranean fauna of the cenotes in the Yucatan Peninsula. Zenodo. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.4661450" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4661450</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Arndt W (1933) Zur Kenntnis der Susswasserschwammfauna Mexicos. Fragmenta Faunistica. Musei Zoologici Polonici 2(5): 18–29.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Beddows P, Blanchon P, Escobar E, Torres-Talamante O (2007) Los cenotes de la península de Yucatán. Arqueología Mexicana 83: 32–35.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Boxshall GA, Zylinski S, Jaume D, Iliffe TM, Suárez-Morales E (2014) A new genus of speleophriid copepod (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subclass">Copepoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Misophrioida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from a cenote in the Yucatan, Mexico with a phylogenetic analysis at the species level. Zootaxa 3821(3): 321–336. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.3821.3.2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3821.3.2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Bushnell JH (1971) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Ectoprocta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in Mexico: architecture and environment of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Carterius</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">latitentus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Fredericella</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">australiensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Fredericellidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). The Southwestern Naturalist 15(3): 331–346. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/3669884" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/3669884</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Camargo-Guerra T, Escalera-Vázquez LH, Zambrano L (2013) Fish community structure dynamics in cenotes of the Biosphere Reserve of Sian Ka’an, Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 901–911. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7550/rmb.33019" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.33019</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Carballo JL, Cruz-Carranza JA, Yáñez B, Gómez P (2017) Taxonomy and molecular systematic position of freshwater genus <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Racekiela</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with the description of a new species from North-west Mexico. Systematics and Biodiversity 16(2): 160–170. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/14772000.2017.1359216" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1359216</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Carballo JL, Gómez P, Cruz-Barranza JA, Yáñez B (2021) Taxonomy and molecular systematic position of freshwater genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Heteromeyenia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with description of a new species from Mexico. Systematics and Biodiversity 19(8): 940–956. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/14772000.2021.1953184" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1953184</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Cardone F, Corriero G, Fianchini A, Gravina MF, Nonnis-Marzano C (2014) Biodiversity of transitional waters: species composition and comparative analysis of hard bottom communities from the south-eastern Italian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 94(1): 25–34. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/s0025315413001306" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315413001306</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Carter HJ (1885) On a variety of the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Meyenia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Florida. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 5(16): 179–181. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00222938509459867" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938509459867</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Cenoteando (2025) Suhem. <ext-link xlink:href="https://cenoteando.mx/job_listing/suhem/" ext-link-type="uri">https://cenoteando.mx/job_listing/suhem/</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Cervantes-Martínez A, Gutiérrez-Aguirre MA, Elías-Guitérrez M, Arce-Ibarra AM, García-Morales A (2018) Aquatic biodiversity in cenotes from the Yucatan Peninsula (Quintana Roo, Mexico). Teoría y Praxis 25: 49–68.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Chávez-Solís EM, Mejía-Ortíz LM, Simoes N (2018) Predatory behavior of the cave shrimp <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Creaseria</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">morleyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Creaser, 1936) (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Caridea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Palaemonidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), the blind hunter of the Yucatan cenotes, México. Journal of Crustacean Biology 38(1): 1–7. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/jcbiol/rux098" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jcbiol/rux098</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Chávez-Solís EM, Solís C, Simões N, Mascaró M (2020) Distribution patterns, carbon sources and niche partitioning in cave shrimps (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Atyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Typhlatya</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Scientific Reports 10: e12812. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-020-69562-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69562-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Cruz-Sánchez M, Mora-Mora J, Girón-García P, Salcedo LC (2018) Caracterización hidroquímica de cenotes del Estado de Yucatán, México. Revista Tendencias en Docencia e Investigación en Química 4: 183–193.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: e772. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/nmeth.2109" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Dawson GM (1875) On some Canadian species of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Canadian Naturalist 8(1): 1–5. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5962/bhl.title.38518" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.38518</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>de Voogd NJ, Alvarez B, Boury-Esnault N, Cárdenas P, Díaz MC, Dohrmann M, Downey R, Goodwin C, Hajdu E, Hooper JNA, Kelly M, Klautau M, Lim SC, Manconi R, Morrow C, Pinheiro U, Pisera AB, Ríos P, Rützler K, Schönberg C, Turner T, Vacelet J, van Soest RWM, Xavier J (2024) World <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Database. <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.marinespecies.org/porifera" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.marinespecies.org/porifera</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Díaz-Hernández JA, Ugalde-Silva P, Berriozabal-Islas C, Novelo A, Hernández-Uc J, Arana-May A, Pech-Patrón SD, Nava-Jiménez IA, Borbolla-Vázquez J (2023) Aquatic microdiversity from urban cenotes in Cancun, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Subterranean Biology 46: 129–145. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/subtbiol.46.108082" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.46.108082</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Ehrenberg GC (1841) Weitere Resultate seiner Untersuchungen über die in Berlin lebenden mikroskopischen unterirdischen Organismen. Monatsberichte der königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1841: 362–364. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/andp.18411301112" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18411301112</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Erpenbeck D, Galitz A, Wörheide G, Albrecht C, Pronzato R, Manconi R (2020) Having the balls to colonize – The <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> group and the origin of (ancient) lake “endemic” sponge lineages. Journal of Great Lakes Research 46(5): 1140–1145. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.028" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.028</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Espinasa L, Chávez-Solís EM, Mascaró M, Rosas C, Simoes N, Violette G (2019) A new locality and phylogeny of the stygobitic <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Typhlatya</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> shrimps for the Yucatan Peninsula. Speleobiology Notes 10: 19–27.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Evans KL, Montagnes DJS (2019) Freshwater sponge (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) distribution across a landscape: Environmental tolerances, habitats, and morphological variation. Invertebrate Biology 138(3): e12258. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ivb.12258" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12258</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Gee NG (1926) Chinese freshwater sponges. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society North China Branch 57: 110–112.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Giudice AL, Rizzo C (2024) Freshwater sponges as a neglected reservoir of bacterial biodiversity. Microorganisms 12(1): 1–25. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/microorganisms12010025" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010025</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>GBIF [Global Biodiversity Information Facility] (2025a) GBIF Occurrence Download (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). <ext-link xlink:href="10.15468/dl.r6vap8" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.r6vap8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>GBIF [Global Biodiversity Information Facility] (2025b) GBIF Occurrence Download (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">robusta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). <ext-link xlink:href="10.15468/dl.r67r93" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.r67r93</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Godefroy N, Goff EL, Martinand-Mari C, Belkhir K, Vacelet J, Baghdiguian S (2019) Sponge diverse system diversity and evolution: filter feeding to carnivory. Cell and Tissue Research 377: 341–351. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00441-019-03032-8" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-019-03032-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Gómez P, Carballo JL, Cruz-Barraza JA, Camacho-Cancino M (2019) On the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Racekiela</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Mexico: molecular and morphological description on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Racekiela</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">cresciscrystae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> n. sp. Journal of Natural History 53(21–22): 1351–1368. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00222933.2019.1637475" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1637475</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Gómez P, Calderón-Gutiérrez F, González-Gándara C, Rojas-Terán MDLA (2021) New species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Microscleroderma</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Amphibleptula</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Demospongiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Tetractinellida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Scleritodermidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from two contrasting marine environments. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 101(2): 241–251. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0025315421000114" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315421000114</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Gost M, Pinya S, Sureda A, Tejeda S, Ferriol P (2023) Effect of alkalinity and light intensity on the growth of the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Aquatic Ecology 57: 353–367. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10452-023-10014-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-023-10014-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Grego J, Angyal D, Liévano-Beltrán LA (2019) First record of subterranean freshwater gastropods (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subkingdom">Mollusca</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Gastropoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Cochliopidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from the cenotes of Yucatán state. Subterranean Biology 29: 79–88. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/subtbiol.29.32779" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.29.32779</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximumlikelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syq010" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Hall C, Camilli S, Dwaah H, Kornegay B, Lacy C, Hill MS, Hill AL (2021) Freshwater sponge hosts and their green algae symbionts: a tractable model to understand intracellular symbiosis. PeerJ 9: e10654. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7717/peerj.10654" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10654</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Hall FG (1936) Physical and chemical survey of cenotes of Yucatan. In: Pearse AS, Creaser EP, Hall FG, Bequaert J, Brown CJD, Clench WJ, Darlington PJ, Furtos NC, Thompson-Gaige H, Hubbs CL (Eds) The Cenotes of Yucatan. A Zoological and Hydrographic Survey. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C., 5–16.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Harrison FW (1979) The taxonomic and ecological status of the environmentally restricted spongillid species of North America. V. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">subtilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Weltner) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Stratospongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">penneyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. nov. Hydrobiologia 65: 99–105. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/bf00017415" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00017415</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Hill MS, Hill AL (2002) Freshwater sponges as indicators of water pollution: an investigative undergraduate lab. In: O’Donnell MA (Ed.) Testes Studies for Laboratory Teaching. Proceedings of the 23<sup>rd</sup> Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE), 385–389.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Harrison FW (1988) Utilization of freshwater sponges in paleolimnological studies. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 62(1–4): 387–397. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/0031-0182(88)90063-6" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(88)90063-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Hooper JNA (2003) ‘Sponguide’: Guide to Sponge Collection and Identification. Queensland Museum, Queensland, 26 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Hustus K, Díez-Vives C, Mitsi K, Nutakki J, Kering V, Nguyen IT, Spencer MG, Leys SP, Hill MS, Riesgo A, Hill AL (2023) Algal symbionts of the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">muelleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Symbiosis 90: 259–273. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s13199-023-00934-8" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-023-00934-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Itskovich V, Gontcharov A, Masuda Y, Nohno T, Belikov S, Efremova S, Janussen D (2008) Ribosomal ITS sequences allow resolution of freshwater sponge phylogeny with alignments guided by secondary structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Evolution 67(6): 608–620. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00239-008-9158-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-008-9158-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Itskovich V, Glyzina O, Kaluzhnaya O (2017) Intraspecific and interspecific sequence variability in the ITS region of the rDNA of freshwater sponges of Lake Baikal and East Siberia. Inland Waters 7(3): 259–266. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/20442041.2017.1320507" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2017.1320507</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Itskovich V, Kaluzhnaya O, Glyzina O (2022) The utility of 28S rDNA for barcoding of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Diversity 14(12). <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d14121126" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121126</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Itskovich VB, Kaluzhnaya OV, Veynberg E, Erpenbeck D (2015) Endemic Lake Baikal sponges from deep water. 1: Potential cryptic speciation and discovery of living species known only from fossils. Zootaxa 3990(1): 123–137. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.3990.1.7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3990.1.7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Jaime S, Cervantes-Martínez A, Gutiérrez-Aguirre MA, Hernández-Flores G, González-Herrera RA, Sánchez-Rivera G, Enseñat-Soberanis F, Delgado-Blas VH (2025) Toward an integrative overview of stygobiotic crustaceans for aquifer delimitation in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Diversity 17(2): 1–77. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d17020077" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d17020077</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Kenny NJ, Francis WR, Rivera-Vicéns RE, Juravel K, de Mendoza A, Díez-Vives C, Lister R, Bezares-Calderón LA, Grombacher L, Roller M, Barlow LD, Camilli S, Ryan JS, Wörheide G, Hill AL, Riesgo A, Leys SP (2020) Tracing animal genomic evolution with the chromosomal-level assembly of the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">muelleri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Nature communications 11: e3676. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41467-020-17397-w" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17397-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Keller-Costa T, Jousset A, van Overbeek L, van Elsas JD, Costa R (2014) The freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> harbours diverse <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pseudomonas</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Gammaproteobacteria</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pseudomonadales</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. PLoS ONE 9(2): e88429. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0088429" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088429</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Kirkpatrick R (1907) Notes on two species of African freshwater sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7(20): 523–525. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00222930709487384" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930709487384</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Laubenfels MW (1932) The marine and fresh-water sponges of California. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 81(2927): 1–140. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5479/si.00963801.81-2927.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.81-2927.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Lauer TE, Spacie A (1996) New records of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) for Southern Lake Michigan. Journal of Grear Lakes Research 22(1): 77–82. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S0380-1330(96)70936-X" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(96)70936-X</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Legendre L, Espinasa L, Lacaille-Múzquiz JL, Alaniz-Garfía G, Ornelas-García P, Rétaux S (2023) First record of a freshwater cave sponge (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, unknown gen. and sp.) in a cave inhabited by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Astyanax</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> cavefish in the Sierra de El Abra, San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Subterranean Biology 45: 187–198. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/subtbiol.45.105323" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.45.105323</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Lemloh ML, Fromont J, Brümmer F, Usher KM (2009) Diversity and abundance of photosynthetic sponges in temperate Western Australia. BMC Ecology 9: 1–4. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1472-6785-9-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-9-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Liévano-Beltrán LA, Simões N (2021) Updated distribution of the mysid <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Antromysis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">cenotensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subphylum">Crustacea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superorder">Peracarida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a protected key species in Yucatan Peninsula Cenotes. Diversity 13(4): e154. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d13040154" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040154</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Linnaeus C (1759) Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Reformata Holmiæ (L. Salvii) 1: 825–1384.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <mixed-citation>Lopp A, Reintamm T, Vallmann K, Päri M, Mikli V, Richelle-Maurer E, Kelve M (2007) Molecular identification, characterization and distribution of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Estonia. Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie 168(1): 93–103. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1127/1863-9135/2007/0168-0093" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1127/1863-9135/2007/0168-0093</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <mixed-citation>Lucentini L, Gigliarelli L, Puletti ME, Palomba A, Caldelli A, Fontaneto D, Panara F (2013) Spatially explicit genetic structure in the freshwater sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759) within the framework of the monopolisation hypothesis. Journal of Limnology 72(1): e14. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4081/jlimnol.2013.e14" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2013.e14</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <mixed-citation>Macario-González L, Cohuo S, Angyal D, Pérez L, Mascaró M (2021) Subterranean waters of Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico reveal epigean species dominance and intraspecific variability in freshwater ostracodes (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subphylum">Crustacea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Ostracoda</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Diversity 13(2): 1–44. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d13020044" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d13020044</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <mixed-citation>Manconi R, Pronzato R (2002) Suborder <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Spongillina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> subord. nov.: Freshwater Sponges. In: Hooper JNA, Van Soest RWM (Eds) Systema <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 921–1021. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/978-1-4615-0747-5_97" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0747-5_97</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <mixed-citation>Manconi R, Pronzato R (2005) Freshwater sponges of the West Indies: Discovery of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Haplosclerida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Spongillina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Cuba with biogeographic notes and a checklist for the Caribbean area. Journal of Natural History 39(36): 3235–3253. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00222930500307327" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930500307327</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <mixed-citation>Manconi R, Pronzato R (2008) Global diversity of sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Spongillina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 27–33. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10750-007-9000-x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9000-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <mixed-citation>Manconi R (2008) The genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Spongillina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>; <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Africa: a case of Mediterranean vs southern Africa disjunct distribution. Biogeographia-The journal of Integrative Biogeography 29(1). <ext-link xlink:href="10.21426/b6110084" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.21426/b6110084</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <mixed-citation>Manconi R, Pronzato R (2016) How to survive and persist in temporary freshwater? Adaptative traits of sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>; <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): A review. Hydrobiologia 782(1): 11–22. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10750-016-2714-x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2714-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <mixed-citation>Manconi R, Pronzato R (2016) Phylum <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. In: Thorp J, Rogers DC (Eds) Keys to Nearctic Fauna. Thorp and Covich's Freshwater Invertebrates (4<sup>th</sup> Edn., Vol. 2). Academic Press, London, 39–83. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/B978-0-12-385028-7.00003-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385028-7.00003-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <mixed-citation>Martínez L (1940) Nota bioestadística sobre los amfidiscos de <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies">mexicana</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> y <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Heteromeyenia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">repens</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies">spinulosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> de Xochimilco. Anales del Instituto de Biología México 11: 191–196.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <mixed-citation>Medina-González R, Proudlove G, Chumba-Segura L, Iliffe TM (2001) Threatened fishes of the world: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ophisternon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">infernale</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Hubbs, 1938) (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Synbranchidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Environmental Biology of Fishes 62: e170. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1023/A:1011816312583" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011816312583</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <mixed-citation>Mejía-Ortiz LM, Yáñez G (2024) Subterranean biodiversity in cenotes in Mexico. Biodiversity Online Journal 4(3): e000590. <ext-link xlink:href="10.31031/BOJ.2024.04.000590" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.31031/BOJ.2024.04.000590</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <mixed-citation>Muricy G, Lopes DA, Hajdu E, Carvalho MS, Moraes FC, Klautau M, Menegola C, Pinheiro U (2011) Catalogue of Brazilian <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Museu Nacional, Série Livros, Rio de Janeiro, 300 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <mixed-citation>Nicacio G, Pinheiro U (2015) Biodiversity of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Spongillina</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from northeast Brazil: new species and notes on systematics. Zootaxa 3981(2): 220–240. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.3981.2.4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3981.2.4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <mixed-citation>Old MC (1936a) Additional North American fresh-water sponges records. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 55: 1–11. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/3223006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/3223006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <mixed-citation>Old MC (1936b) Yucatan fresh-water sponges. In: Pearse AS, Creaser EP, Hall FG, Bequaert J, Brown CJD, Clench WJ, Darlington PJ, Furtos NC, Thompson-Gaige H, Hubbs CL (Eds) The Cenotes of Yucatan. A zoological and Hydrographic Survey. Carnegie Institution of Washington, 29–32.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <mixed-citation>Oscoz J, Tomás P, Durán C (2009) New records of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Eunapius</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fragilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Leidy, 1851) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Linnaeus, 1759) (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Ebro River Basin (N Spain). Limnetica 28(2): 185–188. <ext-link xlink:href="10.23818/limn.28.14" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.28.14</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <mixed-citation>Penney JT, Racek AA (1968) Comprehensive revision of a worldwide collection of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Bulletin of the United States National Museum 272: 1–184. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5479/si.03629236.272.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.272.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <mixed-citation>Pérez-Ceballos R, Pacheco-Ávila J, Eúan-Ávila JI, Hernández-Arana H (2012) Regionalization based on water chemistry and physicochemical traits in the Ring of Cenotes, Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 74(1): 90–102. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4311/2011es0222" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4311/2011es0222</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B82">
        <mixed-citation>Pisera A, Manconi R, Siver PA, Wolfe AP (2016) The sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from the high-latitude middle Eocene: environmental and evolutionary significance. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 90: 673–680. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s12542-016-0328-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-016-0328-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B83">
        <mixed-citation>POETY [Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico y Territorial del Estado de Yucatán] (2021) Ecosistemas kársticos de Yucatán (Base de Datos Mapa Base). Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico del Territorio Costero del Estado de Yucatán. <ext-link xlink:href="https://bitacoraordenamiento.yucatan.gob.mx/documentos/detalles.php?IdArchivo=1725" ext-link-type="uri">https://bitacoraordenamiento.yucatan.gob.mx/documentos/detalles.php?IdArchivo=1725</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B84">
        <mixed-citation>Poirrier MA (1974) Ecomorphic variation in gemmuloscleres of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Linnaeus (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with comments upon its systematics and ecology. Hydrobiologia 44(4): 337–347. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/BF00036300" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036300</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B85">
        <mixed-citation>Poirrier MA (1976) A taxonomic study of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">alba</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">cenota</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">wagneri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species group (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with ecological observations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">alba</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In: Harrison FW, Cowden RR (Eds) Aspects of Sponge Biology, New York, Academic, 203–213. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/b978-0-12-327950-7.50019-1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-327950-7.50019-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B86">
        <mixed-citation>Potts E (1885a) A fresh-water sponge from Mexico. American Naturalist 19: 810–811.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B87">
        <mixed-citation>Potts E (1885b) Freshwater Sponges from Mexico. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 8(542): 587–589. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5479/si.00963801.8-542.587" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.8-542.587</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B88">
        <mixed-citation>Potts E (1888) Contributions towards a synopsis of the American forms of fresh-water Sponges with descriptions of those named by other authors and from all parts of the world. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 39(1887): 158–279.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B89">
        <mixed-citation>Pronzato R, Manconi R (1995) Long‐term dynamics of a freshwater sponge population. Freshwater Biology 33(3): 485–495. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00408.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00408.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B90">
        <mixed-citation>Rasbold GG, Calheira L, Domingos-Luz L, Pessenda LCR, Pinheiro U, McGlue MM (2023) A morphological guide of neotropical freshwater sponge spicules for paleolimnological studies. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10: e1067432. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fevo.2022.1067432" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1067432</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B91">
        <mixed-citation>Ricciardi A, Reiswig HM (1993) Freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) of eastern Canada: taxonomy, distribution, and ecology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 665–682. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1139/z93-091" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-091</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B92">
        <mixed-citation>Rioja E (1940a) Estudios hidrobiológicos. I. Estudio crítico sobre las esponjas del lago de Xochimilco. Anales del Instituto de Biología México 11(1): 173–189.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B93">
        <mixed-citation>Rioja E (1940b) Esponjas, Hydrozoarios y Briozoos del Lago de Pátzcuaro. Anales del Instituto de Biología México 11(2): 443–448.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B94">
        <mixed-citation>Rioja E (1940c) Estudios hidrobiológicos. III. Una nueva variedad de <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fragilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Leidy de las Lagunas de Zempoala. Anales del Instituto de Biología México 11(2): 555–557.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B95">
        <mixed-citation>Rioja E (1953) Estudios hidrobiológicos. XI. Contribución al estudio sobre las esponjas de agua dulce de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología de México 24: 425–433.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B96">
        <mixed-citation>Rioja E (1942) Estudios hidrobiológicos. VI. Identidad de la <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> del lago de Pátzcuaro con la var. mexicana Potts. Anales del Instituto de Biología de México XII: 123–124.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B97">
        <mixed-citation>Rioja E, Herrera T (1952) Ensayo ecológico sobre el Limnobio de Lerma y sus alrededores. Anales del Instituto de Biología 22(2): 565–591.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B98">
        <mixed-citation>Rodríguez-Ríos EA, Cardoza-Martínez GF, Estrada-Arellano JR, Ávila-Rodríguez V, Yáñez-Chávez B, Carballo-Cenizo JJL (2024) <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Climacia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">chapini</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> on Freshwater Sponges in the Cañón de Fernández, Durango, Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist 49(3): 1038–1042. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3958/059.049.0323" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3958/059.049.0323</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B99">
        <mixed-citation>Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/sys029" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B100">
        <mixed-citation>Roovere T, Lopp A, Reintamm T, Kuusksalu A, Richelle-Maurer E, Kelve M (2006) Freshwater sponges in Estonia: genetic and morphological identification. Proceedings of Estonian Academy of Science, Biolology and Ecology 55(3): 216–227. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3176/biol.ecol.2006.3.03" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3176/biol.ecol.2006.3.03</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B101">
        <mixed-citation>Saxena MM (2021) Freshwater sponge fauna (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) of coastal waters of India. Wetlands Ecology Management 29: 767–774. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11273-020-09761-w" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09761-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B102">
        <mixed-citation>Schletterer M, Eggers TO (2006) Evidence of freshwater sponges (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in the Upper Volga River (Russia). Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich-medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck 93: 73–84.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B103">
        <mixed-citation>Schmitter-Soto JJ (2020) La ictiofauna cenotícola (peces de cenote) más relevante de la península de Yucatán. Bioagrociencias 13(1): 9–22. <ext-link xlink:href="10.56369/BAC.3219" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.56369/BAC.3219</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B104">
        <mixed-citation>Schmitter-Soto JJ, Comín FA, Escobar-Briones E, Herrera-Silveira J, Alcocer J, Suárez-Morales E, Elías-Gutiérrez M, Díaz-Arce V, Marín LE, Steinich B (2002) Hydrogeochemical and biological characteristics of cenotes in the Yucatan Peninsula (SE Mexico). Hydrobiologia 467: 215–228. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1023/A:1014923217206" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014923217206</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B105">
        <mixed-citation>SDS [Secretaría de Desarrollo Sustentable] (2013) Reserva Estatal Geohidrológica Anillo de Cenotes. <ext-link xlink:href="https://sds.yucatan.gob.mx/areas-naturales/anillo_cenotes.php" ext-link-type="uri">https://sds.yucatan.gob.mx/areas-naturales/anillo_cenotes.php</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B106">
        <mixed-citation>SDS [Secretaría de Desarrollo Sustentable] (2024) Cenote Sabak Há, Sacalum, Yucatán. <ext-link xlink:href="https://sds.yucatan.gob.mx/cenotes-grutas/cenote-sabakha-sacalum-yucatan.php" ext-link-type="uri">https://sds.yucatan.gob.mx/cenotes-grutas/cenote-sabakha-sacalum-yucatan.php</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B107">
        <mixed-citation>Smith F (1918) A new species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Spongilla</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Oneida Lake, New York. Technical Publications New York State University Coll. For. Cornell University 9: 239–243.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B108">
        <mixed-citation>Socki RA, Perry EC, Romanek CS (2002) Stable isotope systematics of two cenotes from the northern Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Limnology and Oceanography 47(6): 1808–1818. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4319/lo.2002.47.6.1808" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.6.1808</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B109">
        <mixed-citation>Stephens J (1920) The freshwater sponges of Ireland. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 35(B): 205-254.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B110">
        <mixed-citation>Suárez-Moo P, García-Martínez NC, Márquez-Velázquez NA, Figueroa M, Allen E, Prieto-Davó A (2024) Exploring the microbial community and biotechnological potential of the sponge <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Xestospongia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp. from an anchialine cave in the Yucatan Peninsula. Ciencias Marinas 50: e3442. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7773/cm.y2024.3442" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.y2024.3442</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B111">
        <mixed-citation>Suárez-Morales E, Reid JW (2003) An updated checklist of the continental copepod fauna of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, with notes on its regional associations. Crustaceana 78(8): 977–991. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1163/156854003771997855" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1163/156854003771997855</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B112">
        <mixed-citation>Topsent E (1930) Éponges de Lamarck conservées au Muséum de Paris. Archives du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle 6(5): 1–56.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B113">
        <mixed-citation>Van Soest RWM (2025) Typification of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> described in the 10<sup>th</sup> edition of Linnaeus’ Systema Naturae volume II, 1759. Zootaxa 5638(1): 1–65. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.5638.1.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5638.1.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B114">
        <mixed-citation>Vorstman AG (1954) VII. Spongiaria en <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="phylum">Bryozoa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. In: Beaufort LF (Ed.) Veranderingen in de Flora en Fauna van de Zuiderzee (thans IJsselmeer) na de Afsluiting in 1932. C. de Boer Jr., Amsterdam, 156–157.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B115">
        <mixed-citation>Weltner W (1895) Spongillidenstudien III. Katalog und Verbreitung der bekannten Süsswasserschwämme. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 61(1): 114–144.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B116">
        <mixed-citation>Wörheide G (1998) The reef cave dwelling ultraconservative coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana Lister 1900 from the Indo-Pacific. Facies 38(1): 1–88. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/BF02537358" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02537358</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B117">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang X (1948) A study on Kungmin Lake and animals in Yunnan. Contributions from the Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Peiping 4: e124.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B118">
        <mixed-citation>Zhao Z, Li C, Yan X, Yang Q, Ma J (2023) Morphological and molecular analysis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ephydatia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fluviatilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Porifera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Spongillida</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Spongillidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Nanjing, China. Systematics and Biodiversity 21(1): e2228865. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/14772000.2023.2228865" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2023.2228865</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B119">
        <mixed-citation>Zorrilla L (1935) Algunos detalles acerca de los núcleos celulares estudiados por medio de la reacción de Feulgen y particularidades estructurales de las espículas de las esponjas del lago de Xochimilco. Anales del Instituto de Biología 6: 259–268.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
