Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;127(4):1267-1310.
doi: 10.1086/718279.

Deconstructed and Constructive Logics: Explaining Inclusive Language Change in Queer Nonprofits, 1998-20161

Affiliations

Deconstructed and Constructive Logics: Explaining Inclusive Language Change in Queer Nonprofits, 1998-20161

Kristopher Velasco et al. AJS. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

The United States is currently in the midst of a long, historic cultural transformation-redefining our collective representation to be inclusive of diverse sexual and gender identities. A core logic advancing this inclusion is to discursively recognize an expanded set of discrete, deconstructed identities-gay and lesbian expands to LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQIA1, and so on. But a newer logic stipulates that inclusion arises through using constructive identities that encompass many fluid experiences under a single term (e.g., "queer"). To understand inclusive change, the authors leverage a unique mesolevel site of cultural (re)production: service and advocacy nonprofit organizations. Using event history models, the authors investigate inclusive language change by 735 organizations from 1998 to 2016. They supplement analyses of administrative data with semistructured interviews with 13 nonprofit leaders, providing converging evidence. Findings showcase how bottom-up, horizontal, and top-down pressures explain both the inclusion of discrete identity labels and the shift to constructive logics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.—
Fig. 1.—
Change in deconstructed and constructive terminologies, 1998–2016
Fig. 2.—
Fig. 2.—
Number of transitions by year
Fig. 3.—
Fig. 3.—
Number of organizations using deconstructed and constructive terminologies by founding era (years in parentheses). Terms are ordered vertically as listed in the key. The dashed line in the mainstreaming era chart demarcates the start of the new equality era—meaning that growth before this line can be viewed as largely due to new foundings while changes after are more likely due to existing organizations changing terminology. Because of the small number of observations, we exclude the closet era (pre-1970).

References

    1. Altman Dennis. 1996. “Rupture or Continuity? The Internationalization of Gay Identities.” Social Text 48:77–94.
    1. Amenta Edwin, and Polletta Francesca. 2019. “The Cultural Impacts of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 45:279–99.
    1. Ansoff Igor. 1965. Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    1. Armstrong Elizabeth A. 2002. Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Armstrong Elizabeth A.,and Bernstein Mary.2008.“Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements.” Sociological Theory 26(1): 74–99.

LinkOut - more resources