Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 26;10(1):946.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08915-6.

A snapshot of biodiversity protection in Antarctica

Affiliations

A snapshot of biodiversity protection in Antarctica

Hannah S Wauchope et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Threats to Antarctic biodiversity are escalating, despite its remoteness and protection under the Antarctic Treaty. Increasing human activity, pollution, biological invasions and the omnipresent impacts of climate change all contribute, and often combine, to exert pressure on Antarctic ecosystems and environments. Here we present a continent-wide assessment of terrestrial biodiversity protection in Antarctica. Despite Antarctic Specially Protected Areas covering less than 2% of Antarctica, 44% of species (including seabirds, plants, lichens and invertebrates) are found in one or more protected areas. However, protection is regionally uneven and biased towards easily detectable and charismatic species like seabirds. Systematic processes to prioritize area protection using the best available data will maximize the likelihood of ensuring long-term protection and conservation of Antarctic biodiversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A snapshot of Antarctic biodiversity protection. a Antarctic ice-free areas are split into 16 Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions, (ACBRs—denoted by the different colours). The % of species in each ACBR that occur in Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) is shown in bold. The % of all Antarctic species that occur in ASPAs within each ACBR is shown in brackets. b ASPAs are designated for a range of reasons (y-axis). Bars show median number of species in ASPAs that have been primarily designated to protect biodiversity related values (green) or non-biodiversity values (blue), with points for number of species in ASPAs of each designation overlaid. c The ten vertebrates (left) plants and lichens (middle) and invertebrates (right) that are found in the greatest number of ASPAs. The Antarctic map (1a) uses the coastline layer from the SCAR Antarctic Digital Database (Version 7 www.add.scar.org) and the ACBR layer from the Australian Antarctic Data Centre. Data and code used to create these figures are provided as Supplementary Datasets 1,2,3,5 and Supplementary Software 1

References

    1. Chown SL, et al. Antarctica and the strategic plan for biodiversity. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2001656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001656. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chown SL, et al. Challenges to the future conservation of the Antarctic. Science. 2012;337:158–159. doi: 10.1126/science.1222821. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tin, T., Liggett, D., Maher, P. T. & Lamers, M. (eds). Antarctic Futures: Human Engagement with the Antarctic Environment. (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2013).
    1. Amaro E, et al. Assessing trace element contamination in Fildes Peninsula (King George Island) and Ardley Island, Antarctic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015;97:523–527. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stark JS, et al. Physical, chemical, biological and ecotoxicological properties of wastewater discharged from Davis Station, Antarctica. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2015;113:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.02.006. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources