Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 1:58:5-13.
doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0068. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Electromyographical Comparison of a Traditional, Suspension Device, and Towel Pull-Up

Affiliations

Electromyographical Comparison of a Traditional, Suspension Device, and Towel Pull-Up

Ronald L Snarr et al. J Hum Kinet. .

Abstract

Strengthening muscles of the back may have various implications for improving functions of daily living, aiding in the transfer of power in throwing, and assist in injury prevention of the shoulder complex. While several versions of the pull-up exist, there is currently no literature comparing their differences. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the electromyographical activity of the latissimus dorsi, posterior deltoid, middle trapezius, and biceps brachii while performing three variations of the pull-up. Resistance-trained men and women (n =15, age = 24.87 ± 6.52 years) participated in this study by performing traditional pull-ups, suspension device pull-ups, and towel pull-ups in a randomized fashion. Each pull-up was performed for three repetitions with a 1.5 bi-acromial grip-width for each participant. Normalized (%MVC) electromyographical values were recorded for each muscle group during each pull-up variation. No significant differences existed within the latissimus dorsi, biceps brachii or posterior deltoid between any of the exercises. For the middle trapezius, towel pull-ups provided significantly lower muscle activity than the traditional pull-up, while no differences between suspension pull-ups and the other variations occurred. In conclusion, only one muscular difference existed between the exercise variations and all versions examined provided electromyographical values, determined by current literature, to invoke a sufficient stimulus to promote increases in muscle strength and hypertrophy. Although further research is needed, practitioners can be confident when programming any of the movement variations examined when attempting to elicit adaptations of muscular strength and hypertrophy.

Keywords: EMG; resistance training; strength training; suspension training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pull-up (PU)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Towel Pull-up (TP)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Suspension Pull-up (SP)

References

    1. Andersen LL, Magnusson SP, Nielsen M, Haleem J, Poulsen K, Aagaard P.. Neuromuscular activation in conventional therapeutic exercises and heavy resistance exercises: implications for rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2006;86:683–697. - PubMed
    1. Ayotte NW, Stetts DM, Keenan G, Greenway EH.. Electromyographical analysis of selected lower extremity muscles during 5 unilateral weight-bearing exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(2):48–55. - PubMed
    1. Beeler BA, Schmitz CD, Mayhew JL.. Comparison of pushing and pulling shoulder strengths in college wrestlers. Mo J Health, Phys Ed, Recreation, and Dance. 2013;23:57–65.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1998.
    1. Cram JR, Kasman GS. Introduction to Surface Electromyography. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1998.

LinkOut - more resources