Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 25:6:151.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00151. eCollection 2015.

Protection of Antarctic microbial communities - 'out of sight, out of mind'

Affiliations

Protection of Antarctic microbial communities - 'out of sight, out of mind'

Kevin A Hughes et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular biology techniques have shown the presence of diverse microbial communities and endemic species in Antarctica. Endemic microbes may be a potential source of novel biotechnologically important compounds, including, for example, new antibiotics. Thus, the scientific and biotechnological value of Antarctic terrestrial microbial habitats can be compromised by human visitation to a greater extent than previously realized. The ever-increasing human footprint in Antarctica makes consideration of this topic more pressing, as the number of locations known to be pristine habitats, where increasingly sophisticated cutting-edge research techniques may be used to their full potential, declines. Examination of the Protected Areas system of the Antarctic Treaty shows that microbial habitats are generally poorly protected. No other continent on Earth is dominated to the same degree by microbial species, and real opportunities exist to develop new ways of conceptualizing and implementing conservation of microbial biogeography on a continental scale. Here we highlight potential threats both to the conservation of terrestrial microbial ecosystems, and to future scientific research requiring their study.

Keywords: Antarctica; conservation; human impact; inviolate area; microbial diversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abyzov S., Rusanov V., Smagin V. (1986). Preliminary results of microbiological investigations at Mirny. Sovetskaia Antarkticheskaia Ekspeditsiia 78 133–136.
    1. Ah Tow L., Cowan D. A. (2005). Dissemination and survival of nonindigenous bacterial genomes in pristine Antarctic environments. Extremophiles 9 385–389 10.1007/s00792-005-0452-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker G., Ah Tow L., Cowan D. A. (2003). PCR-based detection of non-indigenous microorganisms in ‘pristine’ environments. J. Microbiol. Methods 53 157–164 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00021-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun C., Hertel C. F., Mustafa O., Nordt A., Pfeiffer S., Peter H.-U. (2014). “Environmental assessment and management consequences of the Fildes peninsula region,” in The Future of Antarctica: Human Impacts, Strategic Planning and Values for Conservation, eds Tin T., Liggett D., Maher P., Lamers M. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 169–191.
    1. Broady P., Smith R. (1994). A preliminary investigation of the diversity, survivability and dispersal of algae introduced into Antarctica by human activity. Proc. NIPR Symp. Polar Biol. 7 185–197.