Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species
- PMID: 22993238
- PMCID: PMC3497141
- DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703
Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species
Abstract
Squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) are one of the most diverse groups of terrestrial vertebrates. Recent molecular analyses have suggested a very different squamate phylogeny relative to morphological hypotheses, but many aspects remain uncertain from molecular data. Here, we analyse higher-level squamate phylogeny with a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 161 squamate species for up to 44 nuclear genes each (33 717 base pairs), using both concatenated and species-tree methods for the first time. Our results strongly resolve most squamate relationships and reveal some surprising results. In contrast to most other recent studies, we find that dibamids and gekkotans are together the sister group to all other squamates. Remarkably, we find that the distinctive scolecophidians (blind snakes) are paraphyletic with respect to other snakes, suggesting that snakes were primitively burrowers and subsequently re-invaded surface habitats. Finally, we find that some clades remain poorly supported, despite our extensive data. Our analyses show that weakly supported clades are associated with relatively short branches for which individual genes often show conflicting relationships. These latter results have important implications for all studies that attempt to resolve phylogenies with large-scale phylogenomic datasets.
Figures
References
-
- Sites J. W., Jr, Reeder T. W., Wiens J. J. 2011. Phylogenetic insights on evolutionary novelties in lizards and snakes: sex, birth, bodies, niches, and venom. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 227–244 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145051 (doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145051) - DOI
-
- Kasturiratne A., Wickremasinghe A. R., de Silva N., Gunawardena N. K., Pathmeswaran A., Premaratna R., Savioli L., Lalloo D. G., de Silva J. 2008. Estimation of the global burden of snakebite. PLoS Med. 5, e218. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218 (doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Townsend T., Larson A., Louis E. J., Macey J. R. 2004. Molecular phylogenetics of Squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Syst. Biol. 53, 735–757 10.1080/10635150490522340 (doi:10.1080/10635150490522340) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vidal N., Hedges S. B. 2005. The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. C. R. Biol. 328, 1000–1008 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.10.001 (doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2005.10.001) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wiens J. J., Kuczynski C. A., Townsend T., Reeder T. W., Mulcahy D. G., Sites J. W., Jr 2010. Combining phylogenomics and fossils in higher-level squamate reptile phylogeny: molecular data change the placement of fossil taxa. Syst. Biol. 59, 674–688 10.1093/sysbio/syq048 (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq048) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources