Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1086-91.
doi: 10.1177/0956797612443830. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

Feelings into words: contributions of language to exposure therapy

Affiliations

Feelings into words: contributions of language to exposure therapy

Katharina Kircanski et al. Psychol Sci. .

Abstract

A growing body of research has revealed that labeling an emotion, or putting one's feelings into words, can help to downregulate that affect, as occurs with intentional forms of emotion regulation, such as reappraisal and distraction. We translated this basic research to a real-world clinical context, in which spider-fearful individuals were repeatedly exposed to a live spider. Using a between-subjects design, we compared the effects of affect labeling, reappraisal, distraction from the feared stimulus, and exposure alone during this brief course of exposure therapy on subsequent fear responding. At a 1-week posttest involving a different spider in another context, the affect-labeling group exhibited reduced skin conductance response relative to the other groups and marginally greater approach behavior than the distraction group; however, the affect-labeling group did not differ from the other groups in self-reported fear. Additionally, greater use of anxiety and fear words during exposure was associated with greater reductions in fear responding. Thus, perhaps surprisingly, affect labeling may help to regulate aspects of emotion in a clinical context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Spider and container used in the pretest, immediate posttest, and 1-week posttest.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in skin conductance response (SCR) from the immediate posttest to the 1-week posttest as a function of group. Error bars indicate ±1 SE. Asterisks indicate that pairwise comparisons between groups were significant (*p < .05, **p < .01).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of additional steps completed from the immediate posttest to the 1-week posttest as a function of group. Error bars indicate ±1 SE. The dagger indicates that a pairwise comparison between groups was marginally significant (p = .05).

References

    1. Antony MM, McCabe RE, Leeuw I, Sano N, Swinson RP. Effect of distraction and coping style on in vivo exposure for specific phobia of spiders. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2001;39:1137–1150. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00089-9. - PubMed
    1. Beck AT, Emery G. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. Basic Books; New York, NY: 1985.
    1. Bouton ME. Context, time and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin. 1993;114:90–99. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80. - PubMed
    1. Craske MG, Street LL, Jayaraman J, Barlow DH. Attention versus distraction during in vivo exposure: Snake and spider phobias. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 1991;5:199–211. doi:10.1016/0887-6185(91)90001-A.
    1. Creswell JD, Way BM, Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD. Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2007;69:560–565. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3180f6171f. - PubMed

Publication types