Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;97(3):332-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 25.

Roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the acquisition and expression of fat-conditioned flavor preferences in rats

Affiliations

Roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the acquisition and expression of fat-conditioned flavor preferences in rats

J A D Dela Cruz et al. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Sugars and fats elicit innate and learned flavor preferences with the latter mediated by flavor-flavor (orosensory) and flavor-nutrient (post-ingestive) processes. Systemic dopamine (DA) D1 (SCH23390: SCH) and D2 (raclopride: RAC), but not opioid antagonists blocked the acquisition and expression of flavor-flavor preferences conditioned by sugars. In addition, systemic D1, but not D2 or opioid antagonists blocked the acquisition of flavor-nutrient preferences conditioned by intragastric (IG) sugar infusions. Given that DA antagonists reduce fat intake, the present study examined whether systemic D1 or D2 antagonists altered the acquisition and/or expression of conditioned flavor preferences (CFP) produced by pairing one novel flavor (CS+, e.g., cherry) with a 3.5% corn oil (CO: fat) solution relative to another flavor (CS-, e.g., grape) paired with a 0.9% CO solution. In an expression study, food-restricted rats were trained to drink either flavored 3.5% or 0.9% CO solutions on alternate days. Subsequent two-bottle tests with the CS+ and CS- flavors mixed in 0.9% CO solutions occurred 0.5h after systemic administration of vehicle (VEH), SCH (50-800 nmol/kg) or RAC (50-800 nmol/kg). The rats displayed a robust CS+ preference following VEH treatment (87-88%) the expression of which was attenuated by treatment with moderate doses of RAC, and to a lesser degree, SCH. In an acquisition study, six groups of rats received VEH, SCH (25, 50, 200 nmol/kg) or RAC (50, 200 nmol/kg) 0.5 h prior to 1-bottle training trials with CS+ flavored 3.5% and CS- flavored 0.9% (CS-) CO solutions. A seventh Limited VEH group was trained with its training intakes limited to that of the SCH and RAC groups. Subsequent two-bottle tests were conducted with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in 0.9% CO without injections. Significant and persistent CS+ preferences were observed in VEH (75-82%), Limited VEH (70-88%), SCH25 (75-84%), SCH50 (64-87%), SCH200 (78-91%) and RAC200 (74-91%) groups. In contrast, the group trained with RAC50 displayed a significant initial CS+ preference (76%) which declined over testing to 61%. These data indicate limited DA D1 and D2 receptor signaling involvement in the expression and acquisition of a fat-CFP relative to previous robust effects for sugar-CFP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(Baseline Study): Intakes (mean in g, +SEM, 2 h) of CS+ and CS− solutions in four two-bottle preference tests in untreated animals. Significant differences are denoted between CS+ and CS− intake within tests. The percentages of CS+ intake over total intake are denoted above each pair of values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(Expression Study): Intakes (mean in g, +SEM, 2 h) of CS+ and CS− solutions in two-bottle preference tests in animals receiving systemic injections of the DA D1 antagonist, SCH23390 (Panel A) or the DA D2 antagonist, raclopride (Panel B) 30 min prior to testing. Significant differences are denoted between CS+ and CS− intake within an injection condition (*) and between CS+ or CS− intake following a drug dose relative to the corresponding vehicle treatment (+). The percentages of CS+ intake over total intake are denoted above each pair of values with significant differences relative to vehicle treatment (*) noted.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(Acquisition Study - Training): Training intakes (mean in g, +SEM, 2 h) of rats exposed to ten 1-bottle sessions of flavored corn oil solutions of 3.5% (CS+/3.5% CO, Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9) or 0.9% (CS−/0.9% CO, Days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) 30 min following systemic injections of vehicle (VEH), the DA D1 antagonist, SCH23390 at doses of 25 (S25), 50 (S50) or 200 (S200) nmol/kg or the DA D2 antagonist, raclopride at doses of 50 (R50) or 200 (R200) nmol/kg). A seventh group (LMT) received vehicle injections and had CS+/3.5% CO and CS−/0.9% CO intakes limited to approximate the intakes of the drug groups. Significant differences are denoted between CS+/3.5% CO and CS−/0.9% CO intake within an injection condition (*) and between CS+/3.5% CO or CS−/0.9% CO intake following a drug dose relative to VEH treatment (+).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(Acquisition Study - Testing): Intakes (mean in g, +SEM, 2 h) of CS+ and CS− in three two-bottle preference tests in the VEH (Panel A), SCH25 (Panel B), SCH50 (Panel C), SCH200 (Panel D), RAC50 (Panel E), RAC200 (Panel F) and Limited VEH (Panel G) groups. Significant differences (*) are denoted between CS+ and CS-intake within each test and each group.

References

    1. Ackerman SH, Albert M, Shindledecker RD, Gayle C, Smith GP. Intake of different concentrations of sucrose and corn oil in preweanling rats. American Journal of Physiology. 1992;262:R624–R627. - PubMed
    1. Ackroff K, Sclafani A. Oral and post-oral determinants of dietary fat appetite. In: Montmayeur J-P, le Coutre J, editors. Fat Detection: Taste, Texture, and Post Ingestive Effects. Taylor & Francis; Boca Raton: 2009. pp. 295–321.
    1. Ågmo A, Galvan A, Talamantes B. Reward and reinforcement produced by drinking sucrose: Two processes that may depend on different neurotransmitters. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1995;52:403–414. - PubMed
    1. Azzara AV, Bodnar RJ, Delamater AR, Sclafani A. Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2000;67:545–557. - PubMed
    1. Azzara AV, Bodnar RJ, Delamater AR, Sclafani A. D-1 but not D-2 dopamine receptor antagonism blocks the acquisition of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2001;68:709–720. - PubMed

Publication types