Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jun 22;101(25):9303-8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400023101. Epub 2004 Jun 10.

Population effects of growth hormone transgenic coho salmon depend on food availability and genotype by environment interactions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Population effects of growth hormone transgenic coho salmon depend on food availability and genotype by environment interactions

Robert H Devlin et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms requires determination of their fitness and invasiveness relative to conspecifics and other ecosystem members. Cultured growth hormone transgenic coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) have enhanced feeding capacity and growth, which can result in large enhancements in body size (>7-fold) relative to nontransgenic salmon, but in nature, the ability to compete for available food is a key factor determining survival fitness and invasiveness of a genotype. When transgenic and nontransgenic salmon were cohabitated and competed for different levels of food, transgenic salmon consistently outgrew nontransgenic fish and could affect the growth of nontransgenic cohorts except when food availability was high. When food abundance was low, dominant individuals emerged, invariably transgenic, that directed strong agonistic and cannibalistic behavior to cohorts and dominated the acquisition of limited food resources. When food availability was low, all groups containing transgenic salmon experienced population crashes or complete extinctions, whereas groups containing only nontransgenic salmon had good (72.0 +/- 4.3% SE) survival, and their population biomass continued to increase. Thus, effects of growth hormone transgenic salmon on experimental populations were primarily mediated by an interaction between food availability and population structure. These data, while indicative of forces which may act on natural populations, also underscore the importance of genotype by environment interactions in influencing risk assessment data for genetically modified organisms and suggest that, for species such as salmon which are derived from large complex ecosystems, considerable caution is warranted in applying data from individual studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Weights of transgenic (T) and nontransgenic (N) salmon groups grown in pure transgenic (TT), nontransgenic (NN), or mixed (TN) populations. Environments were provided with different ration levels: (a) high, 7.5% body weight per day; (b) N-satiating, sufficient to satiate nontransgenic populations; and (c) low, 0.75% body weight per day. Intergroup means and associated standard errors are shown, and statistical relations significance of differences in growth among groups within panels are indicated by different letters. Group descriptors: N(NN), nontransgenic salmon from pure nontransgenic groups; N(TN), nontransgenic salmon from mixed groups; T(TN), transgenic salmon from mixed groups; T(TT), transgenic salmon from pure transgenic groups. Suffixes (high, N-satiating, low) of group descriptors indicate ration level. In b, data from a for N(NN)-High are also shown for reference.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Survival of groups as described in Fig. 1. Group descriptors are as in Fig. 1, and the legend in a applies also to b and c. In some cases, groups have not been individually distinguished for clarity, and the number within each statistically similar experimental group is shown. Statistical relations significance of differences in survival of groups across all panels are indicated by different letters. Values within circles are not statistically different.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Frequency histograms of salmon size classes within mixed populations of transgenic (filled bars) and nontransgenic (open bars) salmon at week 10. (a) High ration. (b) N-satiating ration. (c) Low ration. Group descriptors as in Fig. 1. x axis represents binned fish weights (g), but note that scales differ among graphs.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Effect of ration and population structure on physical condition, cannibalistic behavior, and population biomass. (a) Condition factors. Values within circles are not statistically different. (b) Cannibalistic activity by transgenic salmon. Note the caudal fin of a prey fish protruding from the mouth of the transgenic salmon predator. (Bar = 1 cm.) (c) Biomass (grams) of populations reared under low rations. Group descriptors are as in Fig. 1.

References

    1. Devlin, R. H., Yesaki, T. Y., Biagi, C. A., Donaldson, E. M., Swanson, P. & Chan, W. K. (1994) Nature 371, 209-210.
    1. Du, S. J., Gong, Z., Fletcher, G. L., Shears, M. A., King, M. J., Idler, D. R. & Hew, C. L. (1992) Biotechnology 10, 176-181. - PubMed
    1. Rahman, M. A. & Maclean, N. (1999) Aquaculture 173, 333-346.
    1. Nam, Y. K., Noh, J. K., Cho, Y. S., Cho, H. J., Cho, K.-N., Kim, C. G. & Kim, D. S. (2001) Transgenic Res. 10, 353-362. - PubMed
    1. Stokstad, E. (2002) Science 297, 1797-1799. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources