Steward requests/Global permissions

Shortcut:
SRGP

This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation:

Global rollback
Global sysop
Global rename
Global IP block exemption
Other global rights
Removal of access
Local permissions

Dynamic pages:

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests for global rollback permissions

Shortcut:
SRGR

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the Global rollback policy.

Please note that Global rollbackers discussions are not votes. Comments must present specific points in favor of or against a user's approval.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.

=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:H:i j F Y (T)|+5 days}}''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions, no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for RacoonyRE

The following request is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Status: Withdrawn

Global user: RacoonyRE (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 24 February 2021 23:16 UTC

I've been involved with anti-vandalism on dewiki for a long time and would now like to expand it. I care deeply about keeping Wikipedia in a good light and would like to contribute by working across projects to prevent vandalism. In particular, I am also interested in small projects that are not the focus of everyone. I would like to be active "globally". For this I would need the appropriate rights, so that I can move not only in the large platforms. In my activity I pay very close attention to which reverts can be made and I use the rollback only if I am sure beyond doubt that the change is vandalism. I would be very happy if you would come to the decision to grant me this right. Best regards from Germany. RacoonyRE (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You have few global contributions. I suggest you join the SWMT and gain a few months of experience in global patrolling. You currently don't have the rollbacker flag on any projects and you don't have enough experience. The global rollbacker flag allows you to speed up your work, but imho you will need it when you are more practical, regards --Superpes15 (talk) 05:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I appreciate your willingness to help out in anti-vandalism efforts. But you currently do not have a lot of edits outside dewiki. Most of your edits are concentrated in dewiki, with 200+ edits outside dewiki. We prefer candidates to gain crosswiki experience before applying for global rollback. Like what Superpes15 said, please join the SWMT and gain some experience in crosswiki patrolling. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 06:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I echo the other candidates, not yet, but no issues to a reapplication in the future. Leaderboard (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No cross-wiki activity. It would better you come back next time with more experience. --Uncitoyen^talk 10:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Moral Support, come back in a few months with more cross-wiki experience. --Jan Myšák (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I hereby withdraw my request and will re-submit it if necessary when the conditions are met -- RacoonyRE (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissions

Shortcut:
SRGS

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.

Please also review the Global sysops policy.

Stewards: When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.

Please note that Global sysops discussions are not votes. Comments must present specific points in favor of or against a user's approval.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You have a global account ;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;

To make a request: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).

=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:H:i j F Y (T)|+2 week}}''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Global sysop for Savh

Status: In progress

Global user: Savh (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Not ending before 5 March 2021 22:36 UTC

Hi, I'd like to re-apply to the Global Sysop group. I previously was one from July 2011 onwards, nearly ten years ago. I was later elected steward in 2014, and resigned from that position in 2017. The last couple of months I have been quite active again as a part of the SWMT (now using SWViewer), and I think having access to the Global Sysop toolset would be beneficial to intervene in certain situations without the need to call on others for deletions and blocks. As mentioned in my past requests, I'm bilingual Dutch & Spanish, and understand a few other Latin and Germanic languages. Aside from my global activities, I'm a sysop on the Spanish Wikipedia and on the Spanish Wikibooks. Sa vh ^ñ 22:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 05:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 05:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rs chen 7754 05:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- - FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 05:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yes please. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 06:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Leaderboard (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support definitely, trustworthy and competent. -Mh7kJ (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No cencerns. Active user on cross-wiki. --Uncitoyen^talk 10:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Grant steward instead :P. Thanks for volunteering, active xwiki, why not. Support of course. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why not.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Vituzzu (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support-BRP^ever 10:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support dwf² ✉ 10:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Yes, please. Trijnstel_talk 10:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
¡Por supuesto! Sgd. —Hasley 14:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support} Ok. --Irwin ^talk2me 15:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Of course!—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Was there any doubt that I would not support you? Savh has proven theirselves more then enough in the past as steward. --Wiki13 (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --LuchoCR (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not falling for the trick this time. --KPFC 💬 17:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Which trick, @KPFC? Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Saroj Uprety (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global rename permissions

Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers

Global rename for MemicznyJanusz

Status: In progress

Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
User: MemicznyJanusz (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Hello there! I'd like to request global rename permissions to help our polish global renamers (because there's only one active polish renamer). I've read the global rename policy and familiarised myself with other pages connected to the topic (and past requests). I'm mostly active on the Polish Wikipedia, where I'm somewhat experienced in looking out for names violating our local policies. --MemicznyJanusz (talk) 10:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not ending before 22 February 2021 10:30 UTC

Strong support. User is active in reporting users who violate local username policy and ilactively engages in leaving notes for them on their user talk pages. He will be useful in dealing with a local queue, and in time (when he gets cross wiki experiences) might even be eligible to do renames in global queue. Nadzik (talk) 10:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Per Nadzik endorsement. Trusted user locally, active in renaming, the lack of sysop doesn't trouble me with strong local endorsement. Thank you for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support As far as I can see from contributions on plwiki, MemicznyJanusz sends messages to inappropriate usernames and if necessary, reports to admins. Most reports were also processed by the admins. If Nadzik trusts, no problem for me. --Uncitoyen^talk 11:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Ideally you should be a sysop, but this is not mandatory and you look fine otherwise. Leaderboard (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Almost, almost... --MemicznyJanusz (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I know the user, they are OK for the role. einsbor _talk 07:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per plwiki users' vote of confidence. I was a bit hesitant at first, but after looking at the endorsements from plwiki users, I'm inclined to support. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 10:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support plwiki users seem to think they will be helpful in the local queue. I was also hesitant, but the endorsement suggests there are no issues. Looks good. --IWI (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --mirinano (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mirer (talk) 07:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per Camouflaged Mirage --Superpes15 (talk) 00:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -FASTILY 01:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Infinite0694 (Talk) 02:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Nadzik. dwf² ✉ 11:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cabayi (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Jianhui67. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -J. Ansari Talk 15:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --- FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 17:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ZabeMath (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 15:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Geonuch (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — csc^-1 02:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. -- DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemption

Shortcut:
SRIPBE

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards

wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.

Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.

If you want to edit the Chinese Wikipedia, usually global IP block exemptions will not help you. Please see this instruction to request a local IP block exemption.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

You have a global account ;
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;

To request global IP block exemption: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.

=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for 永愛所有小貓咪

Status: In progress

Global user: 永愛所有小貓咪 (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Discussion: I sometimes need to go back to mainland China, but I need to check some information in Wikipedia, in mainland China cannot use it, it’s slow and expensive to use data.

<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --永愛所有小貓咪 (talk) 13:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@永愛所有小貓咪:你好，如果只需要编辑中文维基，去w:zh:WP:RFR申请即可，这里的权限是用于编辑维基数据等网站的。(just explaining if they just want to edit zhwiki they can apply for local IPBE.)--Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 09:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Super Wang Any updates on the local IPBE situation. I didn't see any zhwp IPBE granted. As the requestor is just saying Wikipedia, we cannot assume it is only zh, they might be meaning en (which they also have some edits). Overall I don't see a GIPBE unreasonable per normal GFW situations. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Camouflaged Mirage: User has not reqested for local IPBE yet, maybe they don't know how to. I don't think it's unreasonable to grant them GIPBE either. As GIPBE doesn't make one immune of local IP block, ~~I'm suggesting them applying for a local IPBE flag additionally.~~ --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 11:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this user edited today, they don't seem to be affected by local IP blocks, I won't suggest local IPBE. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 11:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Super Wang I will guess the local IPBE can be applied if there is a local block issue as they seems to suggest it's just a global block they need to exempt from. Will appreciate your help to guide the user on local situation, or I can leave them a message if needed but since you are on it, let me defer to you first. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Camouflaged Mirage: I noted that this user uses Traditional Chinese, which indicates they are from HK, Macau or Taiwan (but they didn't disclose). I guess they don't need to bypass GFW, just need to evade global IP block, so GIPBE is enough. And yes, I've been enthusiastic about helping people for local IPBE, so I will help them apply for local IPBE flag in case they are in need. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 11:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. @Super Wang So to make it easier for stewards: in conclusion, this user doesn't need zhwp IPBE but GIPBE. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Ninjastrikers

Status: Done

Global user: Ninjastrikers (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Because of current situations in Myanmar (Burma), we have encountered problems in accessing Wikipedia. Without using a VPN we can't even access Wikipedia and related project websites starting from yesterday. So, I have to use a VPN to edit on Wikipedia and other related projects. Therefore I need an IP block exemption. Thank you. --Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 06:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 07:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Taung Tan

Status: Not done

Global user: Taung Tan (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Because of current situations in Myanmar (Burma), we have encountered problems in accessing Wikipedia. Without using a VPN we can't even access Wikipedia and related project websites starting from yesterday. So, I have to use a VPN to edit on Wikipedia and other related projects. Therefore I need an IP block exemption. Thank you. Taung Tan (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed: #Myanmar has blocked all language editions of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia, part of a widening post-coup internet censorship regime imposed by the military junta. Network data show restriction in effect on major providers. Report: https://netblocks.org/reports/internet-disrupted-in-myanmar-amid-apparent-military-uprising-JBZrmlB6 Via NetBlocks. Taung Tan (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Taung Tan You currently edit mainly the English Wikipedia. The global exemption does not apply there. Please request one via checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org instead. Thanks, Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for global exemption, granted a local Meta one, so they can still edit this page. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Urbanec what the hell? I only need for en-wiki and Common. I'm creator of many article about current situations. I need to revert vandalism on my article. Please help me. You can see my contributions on en-Wikipedia. Taung Tan (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for GPSLeo and BotLeo

Status: In progress

Global user: GPSLeo (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Status: In progress

Global user: BotLeo (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Want to run scrips from my Hetzner server but it is currently on IP block. If hole 5.9.0.0/16 or just 5.9.97.203 becomes removed from the block list I would not need this right for me and my bot. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GPSLeo Granted for your bot account. Why is it necessary for your personal account to edit from Hetzner infrastructure?

Btw, I recommend looking into Toolforge, an infrastructure provided by the Foundation which can be used for running bots from the cloud. It is not blocked at any Wikimedia wiki, and it allows you to use database replicas as well if you wish. If you have any questions about Toolforge, feel free to let me know.

Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global IP block exempt for ThuTun

Status: Done

Global user: သူထွန်း (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Because of current situations in Myanmar (Burma), we have encountered problems in accessing Wikipedia. Without using a Tor Browser we can't even access Wikipedia and related project websites starting from yesterday. So, I have to use a Tor Browser to edit on Wikipedia and other related projects. Therefore I need an IP block exemption. Thank you. --သူထွန်း (talk) 10:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.

Testing this service may result in the loss of your access and is not recommended for inexperienced users.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

You are logged in on this wiki;
You have read the help page about two-factor authentication and understand how it could lead to irrecoverable loss of access to your account ;

To request 2FA tester global permissions: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.; If the request page is currently protected, please file as an edit request on the talk page.

=== 2FA Tester for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global <!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

2FA Tester for dgoepp

Status: Done

Global user: dgoepp (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

I try to enable 2FA for all my accounts for added security. I use 1Password. I'm familiar and comfortable with 2FA and have read the help page here.

<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --Dgoepp (talk) 23:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for other global permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

You are logged in on this wiki;
No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;

To request additional global permissions: Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.

=== <Add requested permission here> for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

global-interface-editor renewal and abusefilter-maintainer for Billinghurst

Status: In progress

Global user: Billinghurst (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

I wish to continue to have access to global-interface-editor rights. Continuing the general work of past years. No rights have been rescinded xwiki that I hold, I think that I did add abusefilter-maintainer in past 12 months, though maybe that was prior period. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 23:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding abusefilter-maintainer to renewal request though it isn't due to April. May as well synch these rights to make things easier for all parties. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: Do you edit abuse filters in projects in which you have no other rights? In your first request you wrote that you want to test filters. This also works with the Group "Abuse filter helpers". I think that would be better as that doesn't need to be renewed and therefore creates less bureaucracy. --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 08:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I both test and build edit filters for other wikis that are not are not covered by global sysops. I have previously assisted in global cleanups after AF extensions changes, though not been necessary this year. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(after edit conflict) Question: Hello Billinghurst, can you explain this code?

!(
 "autoconfirmed" in user_rights |
 page_title = user_name
) &
page_namespage = 10

Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^(CA) 09:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to ask this type of question every year for a renewal. We don't typically write filters for the template namespace, especially not globally, and not something that I would typically do at a local wiki. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the code is invalid because "page_namespage" is typoed. Legoktm (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK, valid rationale. Leaderboard (talk) 12:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support valid rationale. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MRGN (talk to me!) 06:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Legoktm (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Years of more than competent contribution in these areas. No problem at all with the request. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No problem. --Uncitoyen^talk 11:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ZabeMath (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mirinano (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alaa :)..! 10:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 10:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 11:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sgd. —Hasley 12:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, sure. Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 12:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns --Superpes15 (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support absolutely GeneralNotability (talk) 15:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -J. Ansari Talk 03:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Charitwo (talk) 05:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure. --IWI (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 15:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support,No concerns.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 07:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Saroj Uprety (talk) 09:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Geonuch (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- --- FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 17:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — csc^-1 02:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Minorax (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no concerns. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support dwf² ✉ 10:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

remove global OTRS member for KuboF Hromoslav

Status: Done

Global user: KuboF Hromoslav (edits ^(alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)

Thanks, --Krd 10:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Trijnstel_talk 10:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global rollback permissions

Global rollback for RacoonyRE

Requests for global sysop permissions

Global sysop for Savh

Requests for global rename permissions

Global rename for MemicznyJanusz

Requests for global IP block exemption

Global IP block exempt for 永愛所有小貓咪

Global IP block exempt for Ninjastrikers

Global IP block exempt for Taung Tan

Global IP block exempt for GPSLeo and BotLeo

Global IP block exempt for ThuTun

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions

2FA Tester for dgoepp

Requests for other global permissions

global-interface-editor renewal and abusefilter-maintainer for Billinghurst

remove global OTRS member for KuboF Hromoslav

See also