Abstract
Emerging in the mid-2000s, Pirate parties were the first parties to make the Internet the centre of party politics and party organisation. This chapter reviews the literature on Pirate parties and discusses the legacy of Pirate parties in the use of digital tools for party organisation and internal party decision-making that later inspired new digital parties. The chapter empirically assesses two case studies of the Pirate Party family, the Finnish Pirate Party and the Czech Pirate Party, to demonstrate different applications of digital tools in organisation and campaigning. The cases show that both parties have remained true to the original Pirate ethos in creating and sustaining numerous platforms for open discussion and debate as well as retaining a commitment to transparency and equality in decision-making. While the organisational structure built around online participation and communication has been an advantage for the members and supporters of these parties, the success or failure of parties to mobilise voters in the longer run rests on other factors than the use of digital tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The Swedish Pirate Party received another seat after 18 new MEPs entered the European Parliament in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty.
- 2.
In addition, there were successful pirate parties in the Czech Republic, Iceland and Luxembourg.
- 3.
‘Element’ is the flagship secure-collaboration app for the decentralised matrix communication network.
- 4.
The Finnish newspaper Helsingin Sanomat commented on its editorial page that Pennanen’s initiative is true to pirate ideology: it is copied. The Finnish Communist Party was only a member organisation of the Finnish People’s Democratic League (1944–1990) but in fact steered its politics (HS.fi, 2019).
- 5.
In its first elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, it gained only 0.80% of the votes and thus did not reach the 5% threshold necessary for obtaining mandates. It was almost successful in the 2014 European Elections with 4.78% of votes, but gained no mandates. It is also worth mentioning the success in the municipal elections 2014, winning the post of mayor in the spa town of Mariánské Lázně in West Bohemia.
- 6.
He was a candidate in a three-party coalition: Czech Pirate Party, Green Party and Christian and Democratic Union-Czechoslovak People's Party. The proposing party was the Czech Pirate Party. Libor Michálek was not a political party member (see Šárovec, 2019a, pp. 6–7).
- 7.
The Czech Pirate Party gained mandates in the national parliament, as did the Icelandic Pirate Party. Subsequently, the Luxembourgish Pirate Party was also successful.
- 8.
Moreover the party was created from below, has a history and can build on an extensive network of volunteers and sympathizers (Kilberger, 2017).
- 9.
Free translation: ‘pirate finances’.
- 10.
Among other things, it serves to verify registered supporters.
- 11.
The Czech Pirate Party has two ways to vote on the internet: (i) by Forum or (ii) by Helios.
- 12.
CodiMD is a more modern alternative to the pad that pirates have used in the past.
- 13.
In addition, the party used the Hithit.cz website for a crowdfunding campaign before the 2017 elections (Šárovec, 2019a, p. 11). Another external website, Jobs.cz, acts as a portal for job opportunities in the Czech Republic and abroad. Pirates advertise work opportunities within the party on the website.
- 14.
The party also has a YouTube channel that is not shown in Fig. 11.3.
- 15.
According to party regulations, all contracts and documents of the Czech Pirate Party are archived in the register of contracts or on the Piroplácení website (Piroplaceni.pirati.cz). The Czech Pirate Party maintains a documentary archive of contracts, which is located at the party’s headquarters. It also maintains a digital (transparent) archive called the register of contracts at Smlouvy.pirati.cz (Wiki.pirati.cz, 2020c).
- 16.
Party representatives have a duty to publish lobbying contacts. These are cases where party representatives are contacted by representatives of business, other political parties, non-profit associations and other entities who want to obtain information from party representatives or influence their decisions, but in other instances such people are contacted by party representatives for various reasons (Forum.pirati.cz, 2020b).
- 17.
The link leads to a website with public information on financial aspects of the party operation (e.g. financing of election campaigns, annual financial reports, transparent accounts, economic activities or gifts and donations) (see website Piroplácení and Wiki.pirati.cz, 2020d).
- 18.
Without registration, the site is accessible on a read-only basis.
- 19.
There are three historical regions in the Czech Republic, namely Bohemia, Moravia, and Czech Silesia. An accent on Moravia and Silesia in the name of a split-off pirate party indicates hostility to the original Czech Pirate Party based in Prague, the historic capital of the Czech lands.
- 20.
The party statues specify that voting shall take place, as far as possible, electronically, by correspondence and with an extended voting time (Pirati.cz, 2020b).
- 21.
Helios is a non-partisan organisation led by software engineer and architect Ben Adida. Helios offers verifiable online elections with the statement: ‘We believe democracy is important, whether it’s your book club, parent-teacher association, student government, workers’ union, or state. So we’ve made truly verifiable elections as easy as everything else on the Web.’ According to the website, Helios elections are private (no one knows how participants voted), verifiable (each voter gets a tracking number) and proven (Helios is open-source, vetted by top-tier experts, and used by major organisations) (Heliosvoting.org, 2020; comp. Pereira, 2016).
- 22.
When voting, members can log in to the Helios system via their device connected to the internet. The votes do not have to be added manually, as is the case with other parties.
- 23.
If there was only one such candidate, he would be elected in the first round. It is recommended in the first round to support all options that are acceptable to voters (or even all that are not unacceptable) and in the second round to give votes to those that voters prefer (Wiki.pirati.cz, 2020f).
- 24.
The Supreme Audit Office (SAO) is an independent audit institution with the mission to review the state’s management of public revenue and expenditure. The SAO’s task is to provide feedback to makers and implementers of national policies, so they know how successfully their policies have been implemented and at what price, how effective they have been, and what economic and other impacts they have made (Nku.cz, 2020b).
- 25.
The topic of electronic state administration and the use of e-platforms in general proved to be important even in the context of the coronavirus crisis 2020. A state of emergency was declared in the Czech Republic for 66 days from March to May 2020 (Nguyen, 2020). There was limited access to some public services for citizens within this extraordinary situation.
- 26.
In the 2016 parliamentary elections in Iceland, the pirate party celebrated its largest electoral success, winning 14.5% of the popular vote and securing 10 of the 63 seats in the Althing. In the 2017 parliamentary elections, it won 9.20% of the votes and 6 seats (parties-and-elections.eu, 2020).
- 27.
As well as many variances between the Finnish and the Czech party systems.
References
Airo, T. (2012). Piraattipuolue Suomen puoluekentällä [The pirate party on the Finnish party field] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), University of Jyväskylä.
Andersson, J., & Snickars, P. (Eds.). (2010). Efter The pirate bay. Mediehistoriskt arkiv 19. Kungliga Biblioteket.
Apajalahti, A., & Sotala, K. (2010). Jokapiraatinoikeus [Everypirate’s rights]. WSOY.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Blum, C., & Zuber, C. I. (2016). Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12065
Bolleyer, N., Little, C., & von Nostitz, F.-C. (2015). Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12044
Brunclík, M. (2010). Pirátské strany: Nový fenomén v politice [Pirate parties: A new phenomenon in politics]. Naše Společnost, 8(1), 21–29.
Burkart, P. (2014). Pirate politics. The new information policy contests. MIT Press.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Ct24.ceskatelevize.cz. (2017). Piráti hlasují o odvolání Michálka. Podle některých straníků se provinil proti transparentnosti [Pirates vote on Michálek's recall. According to some party members, he was guilty of transparency]. 2. 12. 2017 https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/domaci/2321413-pirati-hlasuji-o-odvolani-michalka-podle-nekterych-straniku-se-provinil-proti. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Ct24.ceskatelevize.cz. (2019). Místopředseda Pirátů Michálek rezignovat nehodlá. Pokud neskončí, odejdu já, vzkázal europoslanec Peksa [Deputy Chairman of the pirates Michálek does not intend to resign. If he does not quit, I’ll leave, MEP Peksa said]. 23. 10. 2019 https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/domaci/2957831-michalek-celi-kritice-svych-kolegu-pokud-ve-vedeni-piratu-neskonci-rezignuji-vzkazal. Accessed July 16 2020.
Demker, M. (2014). Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European Parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition, 49(2), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.24
Dutton, W. H., & Peltu, M. (2007). The emerging Internet governance mosaic: Connecting the pieces. Information Polity, 12(1–2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2007-0113.
Dutton, W. H. & Peltu, M. (2009). The new politics of the internet. Multi-stakeholder policy-making and the internet technocracy. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics. Routledge.
Erlingsson, G., & Persson, M. (2011). The Swedish pirate party and the 2009 European Parliament election: Protest or issue voting? Politics, 31(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9256.2011.01411.x
European Parliament. (2019). 2019 European election results. 2. 7. 2019. https://europarl.europa.eu/election-results-2019/en/czechia. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Falkvinge, R. (2012). Pirate parties win first senator’s seat, Czech win international race. 21. 10. 2012. http://falkvinge.net/2012/10/21/pirate-parties-win-first-senators-seat-czech-win-international-race. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Forum.pirati.cz. (2019). Odvolání Jakuba Michálka z RP [Jakub Michálek’s recall from the republic board]. 23. 10. 2019. https://forum.pirati.cz/viewtopic.php?t=49201. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Forum.pirati.cz. (2020a). Celostátní forum [National forum]. https://forum.pirati.cz/memberlist.php?mode=group&g=47. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Forum.pirati.cz. (2020b). Evidence kontaktů a schůzek [Records of contacts and meetings]. 11. 11. 2012. https://forum.pirati.cz/viewtopic.php?t=13315. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Forum.pirati.cz. (2020c). Fórum pirátské strany – obsah [Pirate party forum—contents]. https://forum.pirati.cz/index.php. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Fredriksson, M. (2015). The pirate party and the politics of communication. International Journal of Communication, 9(1), 909–924.
Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The digital party: Political organisation and online democracy. Pluto Press.
Gibson, R. K., & Ward, S. J. (1998). U.K. political parties and the internet: ‘Politics as usual’ in the new media? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(3), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1081180X98003003003
Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (2009). Parties in the digital age—A review article. Representation, 45(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802710888
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.
Hartleb, F. (2013). Anti-elitist cyber parties? Journal of Public Affairs, 13(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1480
Helios.pirati.cz. (2020a). Hlasovaci system Helios | Ceska piratska strana [Voting system Helios | Czech pirate party]. https://helios.pirati.cz. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Helios.pirati.cz. (2020b). CF 1/2020 Volba předsedy České pirátské strany – 1. kolo [CF 1/2020 Czech pirate party chairman election—1st round]. https://helios.pirati.cz/helios/elections/4bf08ab4-9694-4d88-9b7d-43814664ceba/view. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Heliosvoting.org. (2020). Helios voting. [cit. 16-07-2020]. https://heliosvoting.org.
Hensel, A., & Klecha, S. (2013). Die piratenpartei. Havarie eines politischen projekts? Otto Brenner Stiftung.
Hintikka, K. (2008). Politiikkaa 2.0 – internet uusien puolueiden alustana [Politics 2.0.—The internet as a platform for new parties]. Politiikka, 50, 69–74.
Hintz, A., & Milan, S. (2011). User rights for the internet age: Communications policy according to ‘netizens’. In R. Mansell & M. Raboy (Eds.), The handbook of global media and communication policy. Wiley Blackwell.
HS.fi. (2019). Piraattipuolue voi kadota omalla päätöksellään [The pirate party may vanish by its own decision]. Editorial comment, HS.fi (Helsingin Sanomat) 23. 11. 2019. https://www.hs.fi/paakirjoitukset/art-2000006317931.html. Accessed July 16, 2020.
iROZHLAS.cz. (2020). VIDEO: Předsedou Pirátů se znovu stal Ivan Bartoš. Na postu první místopředsedkyně zůstává Richterová [VIDEO: Ivan Bartoš became the chairman of the pirates again. Richterová remains the first vice-president]. 11. 1. 2020. https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-domov/pirati-sjezd-ivan-batos-vojtech-pikal-mikulas-ferjencik_2001111037_dok. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Jääsaari, J., & Hildén, J. (2015). From file sharing to free culture: The evolving agenda of European pirate parties. International Journal of Communication, 9, 870–889.
Karmala, J. (2007). Wikidemokratia haastaa puolueet [Wikidemocracy challenges parties]. Vihreä Lanka, 17. 8. 2007. https://www.vihrealanka.fi/node/1490. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Karpf, D. (2016). Analytic activism: Digital listening and the new political strategy. Oxford University Press.
Kauppinen, L. (2019). Piraattipuolue saatetaan lakkauttaa [The pirate party may be disbanded]. Helsingin Sanomat, 20(11), 2019.
Khutkyy, D. (2019). Pirate parties: The social movements of electronic democracy. Journal of Comparative Politics, 12(2), 49–68.
Kilberger, A. (2017). S Jakubem Horákem o kampani Pirátů i Babišově polibku smrti [About the Czech pirate party campaign and Babiš’s kiss of death with Jakub Horák]. Markething.cz, 25. 10. 2017. http://markething.cz/jakub-horak. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Lachapelle, G., & Maarek, P. J. (Eds.). (2015). Political parties in the digital age: The impact of new technologies in politics. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
Leinert, O., & Pokorný, J. (2018). Bez chyb není možné růst, říkají Piráti. A své přešlapy chtějí napravit [Without mistakes, growth is impossible, pirates say. And they want to correct their missteps]. iDNES.cz, 11. 6. 2018. https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/domaci/pirati-snemovna.A180611_080854_domaci_jumi. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Litvinenko, A. (2012). Social media and perspectives of liquid democracy: The example of political communication of the pirate party in Germany. In M. Gascó (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on eGovernment, Barcelona (pp. 403–407). Academic Publishing International Limited.
Löblich, M., & Wendelin, M. (2012). ICT policy activism on a national level: Ideas, resources, and strategies of German civil society in governance processes. New Media and Society, 14(6), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444811432427
Markakis, L. (2014). Pirates lose out in elections, but ideas live on. Euranetplus. 19. 6. 2014. http://euranetplus-inside.eu/pirate-ideas-won-but-the-party-lost-the-elections. Accessed August 21, 2014.
Miegel, F., & Olsson, T. (2008). From pirates to politicians: The story of the Swedish file sharers who became a political party. In N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, K. Nordenstreng, M. Hartman, P. Vihalemm, & B. Cammaerts (Eds.), Democracy, journalism and technology. New developments in an enlarged Europe (pp. 203–216). Tartu University Press.
Nguyen, T. L. (2020). INFOGRAFIKA: V Česku skončil nouzový stav. Ohlédněte se za obdobím plným zákazů [INFOGRAPHICS: The state of emergency in the Czech Republic has ended. Look back to a period full of bans]. E15.cz, 21. 5. 2020. https://www.e15.cz/koronahelpdesk-e15/infografika-v-cesku-skoncil-nouzovy-stav-ohlednete-se-za-obdobim-plnym-zakazu-1369877. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Niedermayer, O. (2013). Piratenpartei Deutschland [The German pirate party]. http://www.bpb.de/politik/grundfragen/parteien-in-deutschland/42193/piratenpartei-deutschland?p=0. Accessed July 16, 2020.
NKU.cz. (2020a). Stát vynaložil na přístup k elektronickým službám veřejné správy zhruba 300 milionů korun, využívá jej ale málo občanů [The state has spent about 300 million crowns on access to electronic public administration services, but few citizens use it]. 13. 7. 2020. https://www.nku.cz/cz/pro-media/tiskove-zpravy/stat-vynalozil-na-pristup-k-elektronickym-sluzbam-verejne-spravy-zhruba-300-milionu-korun--vyuziva-jej-ale-malo-obcanu-id11361. Accessed July 16, 2020.
NKU.cz. (2020b). About us. https://www.nku.cz/en/about-us. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Oscarsson, H., & Persson, M. (2009). Piratpartiets sympatisörer. In S. Holmberg, & L. Weibull (Eds.), Svensk höst. Trettiofyra kapitel om politik, medier och samhälle (pp. 241–248). SOM-undersökningen 2008. SOM-rapport 46. SOM-institutet, Göteborgs universitet.
Otjes, S. (2020). All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics, 40(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719833274
Padovani, C., & Calabrese, A. (2014). Communication rights and social justice. Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Parties and elections.eu. (2020). Parties and elections in Europe. http://www.parties-and-elections.eu. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Pereira, O. (2016). Internet voting with helios. In F. Hao & P. Y. A. Ryan (Eds.), Real-world electronic voting design, analysis and deployment (pp. 277–308). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Perottino, M., Stauber, J., & Šárovec, D. (2020). Reconstruction of the state: Lobbying against political corruption in the Czech Republic. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2054
Piraattipuolue.fi. (2019). Info. https://www.piraattipuolue.fi/info. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Piraattipuolue.fi. (2020). Pirate party of Finland. piraattipuolue r.p. https://www.piraattipuolue.fi. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Piratar.is. (2019). The Icelandic pirate party. https://piratar.is/english. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Pirati.cz. (2017). Volební program Černé na bílém pro volby 2017 do Poslanecké sněmovny [The party manifesto ‘black on white‘ for the 2017 chamber of deputies elections]. https://www.pirati.cz/assets/pdf/program_cerne_na_bilem.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Pirati.cz. (2020a). Pirátská strana [Pirate party]. https://www.pirati.cz. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Pirati.cz. (2020b). Stanovy [statues]. https://www.pirati.cz/o-nas/stanovy.html. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Piratipracuji.cz. (2020). Piráti pracují [Pirates are working]. https://piratipracuji.cz. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Riot.im. (2020). Element. https://riot.im/app/#/group/+piraatit:matrix.org. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Šárovec, D. (2019a). Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni/The Faculty of Philosophy and Arts Review, 11(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24132/actaff.2019.11.2.1
Šárovec, D. (2019b). Is the ‘new’ always ‘new’? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience. Politics in Central Europe, 15(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0003
Svåsand, L. G. (2019). The Swedish pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? In R. Harmel & L. G. Svåsand (Eds.), Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases (pp. 155–170). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Uszkai, R., & Vică, C. (2012). How to assess the emergence of the European pirate parties. Towards a research agenda. Sfera Politicii, 169, 46–55.
White, J. K., & Shea, D. M. (2004). New party politics: From Jefferson and Hamilton to the information age. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Wiki.pirati.cz. (2020a). Rozhlédněte se po lodi! [Look around the ship!]. https://wiki.pirati.cz/po/paluby. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Wiki.pirati.cz. (2020b). Česká pirátská strana – pirati.CZ [Czech pirate party – pirati.CZ]. https://wiki.pirati.cz/portal?redirect=1. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Wiki.pirati.cz. (2020c). Pravidla archivu a registru smluv [Rules of the archive and register of contracts]. https://wiki.pirati.cz/kas/pravidla/registr. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Wiki.pirati.cz. (2020d). Kancelář pirátské strany [Pirate party office]. https://wiki.pirati.cz/ft/start. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Wiki.pirati.cz. (2020e). Členství [Membership]. [cit. 16-07-2020]. https://wiki.pirati.cz/ao/clen
Wiki.pirati.cz. (2020f). Principy dvoukolového hlasování [Principles of two-round voting]. https://wiki.pirati.cz/ao/navody/principy_hlasovani. Accessed July 16, 2020.
Zulianello, M. (2018). Mobilizing young voters? A cross-national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society, 19(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2017.1419666
Acknowledgements
Daniel Šárovec composed the text within the Charles University Research Programme “Progres” Q18—Social Sciences: From Multidisciplinarity to Interdisciplinarity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jääsaari, J., Šárovec, D. (2021). Pirate Parties: The Original Digital Party Family. In: Barberà, O., Sandri, G., Correa, P., Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (eds) Digital Parties. Studies in Digital Politics and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78668-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78668-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78667-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78668-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)


