Skip to content

Update CITATION.cff with doi#19834

Open
Romain-Thomas-Shef wants to merge 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
Romain-Thomas-Shef:patch-1
Open

Update CITATION.cff with doi#19834
Romain-Thomas-Shef wants to merge 1 commit into
astropy:mainfrom
Romain-Thomas-Shef:patch-1

Conversation

@Romain-Thomas-Shef
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

This pull request is to address the lack of doi in the CITATION.cff "preferred-citation" section. The doi of the "preferred citation" section in the CITATION.cff is under a subsection 'identifiers'.

As a result the bibtex generated by github using the 'Cite this repository' functionality does not include the doi. Having it here will help a better tracking.

Fixes #

  • By checking this box, the PR author has requested that maintainers do NOT use the "Squash and Merge" button. Maintainers should respect this when possible; however, the final decision is at the discretion of the maintainer that merges the PR.

The doi of the "preferred citation" section in the CITATION.cff is under a subsection 'identifiers'. 

As a result the bibtex generated by github using the 'Cite this repository' functionality does not include the doi. Having it here will help a better tracking.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Docs label May 29, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.

  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals?
  • Do the proposed changes follow the Astropy coding guidelines?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy testing guidelines?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the Astropy documentation guidelines?
  • Is rebase and/or squash necessary? If so, please provide the author with appropriate instructions. Also see instructions for rebase and squash.
  • Did the CI pass? If no, are the failures related? If you need to run daily and weekly cron jobs as part of the PR, please apply the "Extra CI" label. Codestyle issues can be fixed by the bot.
  • Is a change log needed? If yes, did the change log check pass? If no, add the "no-changelog-entry-needed" label. If this is a manual backport, use the "skip-changelog-checks" label unless special changelog handling is necessary.
  • Is this a big PR that makes a "What's new?" entry worthwhile and if so, is (1) a "what's new" entry included in this PR and (2) the "whatsnew-needed" label applied?
  • At the time of adding the milestone, if the milestone set requires a backport to release branch(es), apply the appropriate "backport-X.Y.x" label(s) before merge.

@pllim pllim added this to the v7.2.1 milestone May 29, 2026
@pllim pllim added Bug no-changelog-entry-needed backport-v7.2.x on-merge: backport to v7.2.x backport-v8.0.x on-merge: backport to v8.0.x labels May 29, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pllim pllim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Looks correct to me but I am not wise in the way of CFF, so second pair of eyes would be appreciated.

@pllim pllim requested review from adrn, astrofrog and olebole May 29, 2026 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-v7.2.x on-merge: backport to v7.2.x backport-v8.0.x on-merge: backport to v8.0.x Bug Docs no-changelog-entry-needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants