[opt](distribution) support bucket shuffle for set operation#59006
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 35279 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 174752 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.45 s |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 34987 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 178993 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.11 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 36722 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 166770 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.21 s |
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
f6f2b15 to
857a966
Compare
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 35327 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 178675 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.18 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 35367 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 178363 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.65 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 32053 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173216 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 26.85 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
1 similar comment
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
…59006) support bucket shuffle for set operation(union/intersect/except)
…le compute wrong result (#60823) fix bucket shuffle + set operation + local shuffle compute wrong result, because backend can not plan the correct local shuffle type, introduced by #59006. so we should disable bucket shuffle for set operation now, after support plan local shuffle in frontend, we can support this feature.
What problem does this PR solve?
support bucket shuffle for set operation(union/intersect/except)
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)