Thanks for working on this! I think the approach here looks good

Testing on macOS, I was seeing somewhat more padding than in your screenshot, so perhaps there's an extra margin coming from somewhere. I'll poke around in the GTK inspector to see if there's anything obvious

Looking into the layout with the GTK inspector, the main things I saw were just:

• we probably don't need the two Gtk.Separator widgets (one in between the size labels, and before the zoom widgets)
• I was able to get away with WidthChars = 11 at least on my system. I think this is because the font isn't fixed-width, so it's not an exact measurement

Looking into the layout with the GTK inspector, the main things I saw were just:

• we probably don't need the two Gtk.Separator widgets (one in between the size labels, and before the zoom widgets)
• I was able to get away with WidthChars = 11 at least on my system. I think this is because the font isn't fixed-width, so it's not an exact measurement

Thanks for the feedback. It makes sense! I will look to push a few more tweaks based on this as soon as I get the chance.

Sorry for the delay here. I've been doing some traveling over the summer.

I pushed the suggested changes from your comments and it still looks good in my testing. A little more tight than before when the character width was 12, but it looks better, I think.

I would maybe even reduce the padding between the icon and the numbers to one character. Currently it's set to two empty spaces.

This is how the numbers would look with just one white space character padding

And this is with no padding at all

And with smaller values for the coordinates

I think it looks best with no padding, basically this change

Thanks! Yeah I agree that looks good with no padding 👍

I removed the padding now.

Looks good, thank you!