Jump to content

Wikipedia:April Fools' Main Page/Did you know

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesTM:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Please use this page for discussions surrounding the creation of "Did You Know" items for April Fools' Day 2027

Areas of work needed to complete the front page are:

Ground rules for this activity along with a list of participants may be found on the Main talk page.

Rules

[edit]

April Fools Did You Know items should present some trivia that can be presented in a manner that is possibly unbelievable to the reader. This can be done through words or names that mean two different things, shortened names, unbelievable facts, unrelated facts, etc. The normal written and unwritten rules for Did You Know (DYK) are followed, with these exceptions...

  • April Fools DYKs are subject to the usual exclusions regarding prior Main Page appearance, but the normal rules for special occasions do not apply: the article need only have been created/expanded/brought to GA in the year immediately preceding the April 1 on which it will appear.
  • Proper capitalization, title formatting, and linking standards may be disregarded only if adhering to them will tend to give away the joke. This should be done as little as possible. (example from 2009: "... that Caviar, Chardonnay, and Hot Cocoa compete for the love of Ray J? ")

All other Wikipedia rules and guidelines still apply. Pay special attention to Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons guidelines if your hook relates to a living person.

Remember, we are trying to confuse and mislead Wikipedians and visitors, not lie to them. Keep all hooks and articles completely truthful, but outrageous. (examples from 2010: A hook claiming Dmitry Medvedev died in 2005 is ok, saying Mikheil Saakashvili died is not.)

How to review a nomination

[edit]

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets the DYK criteria except, per above, the normal new enough rule (long enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the guidelines.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, please use the following symbols to point the issues out:

Symbol Code Status Description
{{subst:DYKtick}}
{{subst:DYKyes}} 		Approved No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}}
{{subst:DYKno}} Rejected Article is either completely ineligible or otherwise requires an insurmountable amount of work before becoming eligible.
{{subst:DYK?again}} New review Requesting a second opinion or fresh review

An article cannot be officially promoted until a reviewer has given approval () to at least one of the article's hooks.

Nominations

[edit]

Awaiting verification

[edit]

Note: Nominations for April 1 should be added to Template talk:Did you know in the usual way, as well as below.

Verified hooks

[edit]

Wombat feces

(
)
Two deposits of wombat feces next to a one pound coin
Two deposits of wombat feces next to a one pound coin
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 387 past nominations.

Launchballer 19:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC).[reply]

  • I couldn't resist reviewing this in return. The article is long enough, new enough and well-written. QPQ is done and the pic has an appropriate licence tag. The hook is supported by reliable inline citations. Is the hook good? No, it's magnificent. Good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved this to Wikipedia:April Fools' Main Page/Did you know. TarnishedPathtalk 09:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesan election

(
)
  • ... that Chinese prostitutes were elected?
  • Source: * Hershatter, Gail (1999). Dangerous Pleasures: Prostitution and Modernity in Twentieth-Century Shanghai. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 165–169. ISBN 978-0-520-20439-3.
  • ALT1: ... that one winner of a courtesan election became the "milk president"? Source: * Hershatter, Gail (1999). Dangerous Pleasures: Prostitution and Modernity in Twentieth-Century Shanghai. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-520-20439-3. The winning courtesans received elegant sets of Western-style furniture; the first-place winner was thenceforth known throughout Shanghai as the "milk president," after the main ingredient in the sponsor's product.
  • ALT2: ... that patrons reportedly bought thousands of ballots so their favourite courtesans could be elected? Source: * He, Qiliang (2018). Newspapers and the Journalistic Public in Republican China: 1917 as a Significant Year for Journalism. New York, London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-79669-2. In one report in the Eastern Times, for example, a certain Mr. Yuan, the fourth son of Yuan Shuxun (1847–1915), intendant of Shanghai from 1891 to 1892, was said to have created a sensation in the courtesan circles for buying over 20,000 voting slips for his beloved courtesan, Judi. ... In a separate report regarding two male patrons' subscriptions, one of 10,000 and the other of 3,000 pieces of newspapers, to acquire the voting slips,
  • ALT3: ... that the winners of courtesan elections could see their value increase tenfold? Source: Henriot, Christian (2001). Prostitution and Sexuality in Shanghai: A Social History, 1849–1949. Translated by Castelino, Noel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-57165-4. Wang Tao says that being ranked had the effect of making a girl immediately famous and of increasing her value tenfold. Conversely, those who were not selected saw it as a form of disgrace or discredit.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Else Went
  • Comment: ALT0 is suggested as an April Fools hook.
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 787 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:29, 15 April 2026 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: All look good. For an ordinary hook, I approve ALT2 as it appears the more interesting of them all. If chosen for April's fools hook, then ALT0 is also good. A.Cython(talk) 00:19, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel A. Shelton

(
)
Samuel A. Shelton
Samuel A. Shelton
  • ... that Samuel A. Shelton (pictured) knows better than to stick his head against a buzz-saw?
5x expanded by Guerreroast (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 37 past nominations.

Roast (talk) 05:46, 25 March 2026 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Nice work on the expansion. All hooks are interesting, but if ALT0/1 are used, I would put quotes around "knows better than to stick his head against a buzz-saw" and "...to run up against a stone wall" if it doesn't run on April 1. Epicgenius (talk) 15:38, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm okay with using quotes for it. Roast (talk) 15:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]


Alejandro Moral Antón

(
)
Created by Thriley (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 214 past nominations.

Thriley (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Bordering on the line of newness, but I think it's close enough. Correct me if the 7-day period is absolutely strict and doesn't have wiggle room. Long enough, every paragraph has a source, neutral, passes Earwig, QPQ done. Hook verified. As it is right now, I think it would work great for an April Fools hook, but I would suggest ALT1 for a non-April Fools hook.

ALT1 ... that Alejandro Moral Antón succeeded the future Pope Leo XIV as prior general of the Order of Saint Augustine? PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 23:56, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Boldly moving this nomination to the April Fool's section as ALT0 is far superior and an excellent AFD hook. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]


See the Old Lady Decently

(
)
  • Source: Coe, Jonathan (4 June 2004). Like a Fiery Elephant: The Story of B S Johnson. Picador (imprint). p. 29-32.
Created by ISD (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.

ISD (talk) 08:00, 3 April 2026 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @ISD: Sorry that you had to wait so long for a review. Looks good except for just one concern that needs to be resolved above. Epicgenius (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think ALT0 is terrific for April Fool's Day and have moved this nomination to that section. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, while I have no problem with this going up on April Fools, I just want to make sure the hook doesn't cause too much offensive, in that the reason why Johnson never completed his Matrix Trilogy of books is because he took his own life. I don't want anyone to get into trouble if this is an issue. ISD (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Idris elba (wasp)

(
)
  • ... that Idris Elba's parasitism of stink-bug eggs was described as “absolutely baffling”?
Moved to mainspace by EmergentAnarchy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

EmergentAnarchy (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Also approving ALT2 and ALT3 for WP:DYKAPRIL.--Launchballer 21:05, 20 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bread (1930 film)

(
)
  • ... that the film Bread was banned by Soviet censors in 1930 and was not re-released until 2013?
Created by Grnrchst (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 79 past nominations.

Grnrchst (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough at 3440 characters. Two QPQs done. Sources are all in Ukrainian, as a random spot check, could you provide the quote and source that supports "while also criticising it for its trivial plot"? The lead states that the film was acquired from the Russian State Film Fund, but the body does not make this connection. The Cast section does not have a source. Some parts of the infobox are not in the body and without a source, including the writer, the director's editing credit, the release dates, the mention of the All-Ukrainian Photo Cinema Administration, and the run time. Ideally these would all be present and sourced in the body.
    Both hooks seem supported, as far as I can tell. Tempted to agree ALT1 could work for the April Fools set. No other issues identified, so with some source work this should be fine. CMD (talk) 16:05, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Chipmunkdavis: I checked the source, and it seems the bit about the "trivial plot" was more of a statement than a criticism, so I cut this. That it was "acquired" from the Russian Film Fund seemed obvious to me, seeing as that was where it was held and rediscovered, but I've rewritten just in case. Per the Manual of Style on films, the cast list and the production information in the infobox is taken directly from the opening credits of the film, so it doesn't need to cite a separate source. Added premiere date to prose. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
      • The only exception I'm reading in MOSFILMCAST is about Plot ("basic descriptions of their plots do not need references to an outside source"), also surprised the runtime is in the opening credits but I have not seen this film. The use of acquired is not an issue in itself (source [4] seems to heavily imply it), it's the presence of the information in the lead but not in the body which I raised. CMD (talk) 02:04, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Chipmunkdavis: It seems like overkill to me, for information that is all verified by the film itself, but I've loaded the infobox and cast list up with citations now. Are there any further issues I need to fix? --Grnrchst (talk) 08:50, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
          • I think that covers everything I raised. Regarding the film itself, I was wondering what its copyright status might be given a 1930 publishing date, but it may still be protected under Ukrainian law. I will add this to the April Fools' Day list once the bot shifts it to approved. CMD (talk) 09:09, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
            • @Chipmunkdavis: The Soviet Union had a life+25 copyright term, which as Shpykovskyi died in 1977, should have made it public domain in 2002; however, Ukraine joined the Bern convention in 1996 and retroactively extended copyright terms to life+70 in 2001, so it seems this film won't be PD until 2047. Shame. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Desis Rising Up and Moving

(
)
  • Source: "those early endorsers: Desis Rising Up & Moving (DRUM Beats)... His support and hunger strike for taxi medallion debt relief in 2021" (link), "Over the next two weeks, 78 people joined the hunger strike at various points.... The others included... DRUM (Desis Rising Up & Moving)." (link)
  • Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by Sumanah (talk) and Jessamyn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Sumana Harihareswara 17:45, 27 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Bremps... 01:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • – Moved to main space on 26 June. The sources are okay, although not many citations are known publications or newspapers, at least outside the US. But they are reliable anyway. Earwig shows normal levels of copyvio issues, and no QPQ was required for the nominator. The hook is interesting and within the hook range (it is 178 characters long). I am approving of both hooks; I guess that you Bremps and Sumanah will have to decide because that day is way too far in time, Bremps, LOL. Oh, small detail, can you please unbold that word in the first header? Thx. CoryGlee 02:25, 28 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]


Wednesday Addams (Wednesday)

(
)
Created by HalfHazard98 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 415 past nominations.

Launchballer 23:01, 18 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

@HalfHazard98 and Launchballer: Hi. I now see no major problems in the article, would appreciate if this also be a GAN candidate. Long and new enough, well-written and well-sourced. Earwig comes green. QPQ presented. Images in the article are licensed. Hook is verified by this source and should work for the DYKAPRIL (however, it is more than 9 months away). Thank you and all the best. M. Billoo 13:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Billoo2000: Thanks, Billoo! Pleasure working with you again! Do you actually want me to nominate the Enid and Wednesday articles for GA? Would you be willing to review them if I did? -HalfHazard


Beer O'Clock Hill

(
)
Created by Not stuart60 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Not stuart60 (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, sourced (mostly minor and a few marginal publications but eh), neutral, and clean on an Earwig check. ALTs 0 and 1 are verified and interesting; I'll let someone else review ALT2, though. No image provided, no QPQ needed. Nice work! (Maybe explain what "rutted" means in this context?) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:25, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Also approving ALT2 for WP:DYKAPRIL.--Launchballer 21:03, 20 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Not stuart60: do you have a preference for WP:DYKAPRIL or would you rather take something sooner if possible? TarnishedPathtalk 10:11, 16 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I do not have a preference for when it is ran, either option is fine. Not stuart60 (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
OK, moved to WP:DYKAPRIL for ALT2. TarnishedPathtalk 08:49, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:April_Fools%27_Main_Page/Did_you_know&oldid=1364750573"