User talk:Neddyseagoon

Please click here to leave me a new message under a new heading.

User page - Contribs - Watchlist

Henry Thomas Hope

Hi -

Looking at the history of the Henry Thomas Hope page, it looks like you initially created this page. I found last night when I went to add an edit to it that it had been vandalized with inappropriate content. I think I have it cleaned up, and have added my new edits, but I thought you might want to take a look at it.

Thanks so much! Diane Snider

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

CfD nomination of Category:Years of the French Third Republic

Category:Years of the French Third Republic has been nominated for merging. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

Nomination of The Corona, Canterbury Cathedral for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Corona, Canterbury Cathedral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Corona, Canterbury Cathedral until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

DougieMcC (talk) 19:16, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gottfried II, Count of Sponheim

The article Gottfried II, Count of Sponheim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Misterpotatoman (talk) 03:54, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parlement of Dole, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public prosecutor general was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Category:Roman sites in France by region has been nominated for merging

Category:Roman sites in France by region has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 4 § Artefacts

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 4 § Artefacts on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:14, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gottfried II, Count of Sponheim

The article Gottfried II, Count of Sponheim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub, doesn't cite any sources, most information is covered on other articles.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Misterpotatoman (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primavera (film), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doge was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Siege of Bletterans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Bletterans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Bletterans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

JMWt (talk) 18:09, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 20 § "Alumni of..." categories

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 20 § "Alumni of..." categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:41, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Kellola moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Kellola. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🦅White-tailed eagle^{Talk to the eagle}Stalking eagle 01:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Category:Ancient Roman military engineers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Ancient Roman military engineers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 23:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Neddyseagoon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  TonyBallioni (talk) 01:29, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Franz Fridolin Weber

Hello, Neddyseagoon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Franz Fridolin Weber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johann Christoph Fugger

The article Johann Christoph Fugger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as unreferenced for 9 years and for notability concerns for 10 months. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate, nor is the talk page helpful. Unsourced genealogy masquerading as a biography. A Google search reveals only passing mentions. Lacks significant coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2026 (UTC)