Jump to content

User talk:Lynch44

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Committed identity: 794d6ae4697487cfc95f27bc3913aa877b76df7526c39d317ecc20f7fedcb8375a97a83957e7b9069065a6c92044f8bf768c4ccc75a4ba482b68a35547f2ddf9 is an SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Resubmission of Draft:Mustafa Deniz Yılmaz — courtesy note

[edit]

Hi Lynch44, thank you for reviewing the draft. I've resubmitted with substantial improvements:

  • Added a free-licensed portrait of the subject (Commons upload)
  • Expanded career history with additional institutional affiliations (Afyon Kocatepe University, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences)
  • Strengthened the evidence for WP:NACADEMIC criterion 1 by citing independently maintained bibliometric indices: OpenAlex (138 indexed publications, h-index 20, i10-index 44, 1,318+ citations) and Google Scholar

I respectfully note that WP:NACADEMIC provides an alternative path to notability for academics, in addition to WP:GNG. Criterion 1 — "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" — is supported here by the bibliometric profile, including a co-authored study in Science Translational Medicine (a high-impact venue) and senior-authored studies in field-specific journals indexed in PubMed.

I welcome any further feedback. Thanks for the volunteer work you do reviewing AfC. Mesutadiguzel (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please note that per WP:INDEPENDENT, sources authored by or affiliated with the subject do not count towards notability. While that does not make them inherently unusable or unreliable, it does mean that you need more than papers authored by the subject to satisfy notability. Linking their Google Scholar profile is no good; there are thousands upon thousands of non-notable individuals who have written a research paper. And yes, while WP:NACADEMIC does indeed state that, it follows that very sentence fragment up with "as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." Lynch44 20:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle preferences

[edit]

Your Twinkle is still logging CSD nominations at User:Lynch44/User:Lynch44/CSD log after you moved that page to a corrected title. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:19, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my Twinkle preferences, hopefully that should fix it. Lynch44 10:22, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

[edit]

Hello Lynch44,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joker Mentality

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Lynch44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joker Mentality, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:12, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]