Jump to content

User talk:Ivanvector

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for being such great admins for this site! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:44, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RfC you participated in archived without close — please advise

[edit]

The RfC you participated in and which you subsequently commented on regarding the unusual removal of its RfC template was archived by Lowercase sigmabot III without a formal close. As the discussion was never resolved, could you please advise on the appropriate next step - whether to request a formal close or to start a new RfC referencing the archived one? Tinterest (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tito is back

[edit]

After you banned him, and after having already been banned in the past, he came back to rant and pollute the "Talk" board of the N-1 rocket: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/~2026-17925-45 Resuming the cooperative edition of this page and discussing something else than his personal obsession is difficult while he's around. He just posted 6 differents messages today only on this page, and nothing can stop him spamming I guess. You asked me to contact you if I noticed he came back; here he is. NoTimeForUs (talk) 21:05, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous