User talk:Ingminatacam

Welcome!

Hi Ingminatacam! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 20:44, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Energy infrastructure closed in 1975 has been nominated for deletion

Category:Energy infrastructure closed in 1975 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Copper extraction

I have reverted your edits to Copper extraction because they contained multiple errors where you misrepresented what the sources say. Please be careful to accurately reflect what is in the sources, per WP:V. Thank you, Opolito (talk) 00:41, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Can you explain what is misinterpreted? Ingminatacam (talk) 00:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

A few examples: sulphuric acid is used in copper leaching, it is not a byproduct of copper extraction. Similarly while some precious metals co-occur with copper and may be a byproduct of extraction, it is wrong to state they always will be. Also, the source you quoted for the increase in China's copper production said there was an 11% increase year-over-year, while you stated that is had been 11% annual growth for more than a decade. Opolito (talk) 00:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Im working to address these issues. The sulphuric acid production is as in source: "One of the most significant byproducts of the concentrate smelting process today is the production of sulfuric acid." (p. 27). Which is logical as the sulphur (S) in copper compounds has to go somewhere during refining. About precious metals I am about to change the sentence that they "can be valuble byproducts". Thank you for the input. Ingminatacam (talk) 01:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Sociedad Nacional de Minería moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sociedad Nacional de Minería. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Copper mining in Chile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tailing. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iron mining in Chile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stratiform.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Monturaqui-Negrillar-Tilopozo Aquifer. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 09:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Capstone Copper. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 09:46, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Merge of CAP S.A. and Compañía de Acero del Pacífico

Hello! I notice a few months ago you added merge tags to CAP S.A. and Compañía de Acero del Pacífico. If you still think these should be merged, I suggest starting a new discussion on one of their talk pages to explain your rationale and let others weigh in. Otherwise the merge will probably never end up taking place. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Thebiguglyalien, thank you. I just hoped for somebody else to jump in and dig a bit on the subject, wether CAP is the same as Compañía de Acero del Pacífico or if the latter is a subsidary. I will check, probably next week, and come back with a proposal. Ingminatacam (talk) 23:27, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Sociedad Nacional de Minería moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sociedad Nacional de Minería 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:35, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Andrés Andai. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, this article needs more sources from reliable independent sources. I suggests that the article should be improved or moved to draft space

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

@Uncle Bash007:, what article are you talking about? Ingminatacam (talk) 14:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

@@Ingminatacam, about this article you created Andrés Andai! Uncle Bash007 (talk) 14:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Panulcillo. Another editor, Northernhenge, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It would be good to find some more sources so that it is less reliant on source 2. Mines everywhere cause subsidence so source 3 needs more explanation. Why is it important here?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Northernhenge}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Northernhenge (talk) 20:04, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Category:Mining companies established in 1985 has been nominated for deletion

Category:Mining companies established in 1985 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 13:32, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Planta Magnetita moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Planta Magnetita. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:46, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Cerro Negro Norte moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cerro Negro Norte. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:30, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Punta Totoralillo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Punta Totoralillo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Centinela mine moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Centinela mine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

La Coipa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to La Coipa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

El Alto mining project moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to El Alto mining project. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centinela mine (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Its seems like that this mine is notable, but it's going to need more independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centinela mine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Ingminatacam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Lomas Bayas moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lomas Bayas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and A single independent source is not enough to establish notability.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centinela mine has been accepted

Centinela mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Grupo Minero Las Cenizas moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Grupo Minero Las Cenizas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:08, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chilean nationalization of iron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Serena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Ministro Hales moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ministro Hales. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Gabriela Mistral mine moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gabriela Mistral mine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Chilean Copper Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chilean Copper Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chilean Copper Commission (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chilean Copper Commission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 13:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chilean Copper Commission has been accepted

Chilean Copper Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Shocksingularity (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Please change your user page

Hi, your user page as it now stands appears to be an article. This is not allowed under the WP:FAKEARTICLE guideline. I suggest you move it to a userspace draft or blank it. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Fundición Chagres moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fundición Chagres. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grupo Minero Las Cenizas (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More in-depth sources are needed. Additionally, bnamericas does not seem reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grupo Minero Las Cenizas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:53, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Ca, why would Bnamericas not be reliable? I have read dozens of their articles and company info they provide I have so far failed to detect any bias. The information they provide is often in depth and accurate when it is possible to contrast with other sources. Ingminatacam (talk) 13:39, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chilean silver rush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign investment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cerro Negro Norte Mine has been accepted

Cerro Negro Norte Mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 20:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planta Magnetita has been accepted

Planta Magnetita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punta Totoralillo (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GreenRedFlag were:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The draft page for Punta Totoralillo is potentially eligible for publication on Wikipedia, but it currently lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.

To improve the chances of acceptance: 1) Add independent sources: Look for news coverage, government reports, or academic publications discussing the port’s role, impact, or development. 2) Clarify significance: Emphasize why Punta Totoralillo is notable—e.g., its strategic importance, unique infrastructure, or role in Chile’s mining exports.

3) Avoid promotional tone: Ensure the article maintains a neutral, encyclopedic style.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Punta Totoralillo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lomas Bayas has been accepted

Lomas Bayas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 13:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriela Mistral mine has been accepted

Gabriela Mistral mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MediaKyle (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Farkas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Farkas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Farkas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fundición Chagres (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GreenRedFlag was:

Please follow these rules:

Use Independent, Reliable Sources: Replace citations from the company's own reports and industry groups (like Consejo Minero) with independent, third-party sources like major news organizations (e.g. The Guardian, Bnamericas) and academic papers.

Demonstrate Notability in the Text: Expand the article to include well-sourced information that proves why the smelter is notable. Key topics to cover are its environmental impact and community relations, its role in the Chilean copper industry, and its operational history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fundición Chagres and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ministro Hales has been accepted

Ministro Hales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Earth605^talk 14:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Two months was way to long this article to wait for review. Ingminatacam (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

"Marubeni Copper Holdings Limited" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Marubeni Copper Holdings Limited has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 20 § Marubeni Copper Holdings Limited until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:54, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Grupo Minero Las Cenizas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grupo Minero Las Cenizas. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grupo Minero Las Cenizas (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Corporations do what corporations do. What makes this one pass WP:NCORP? This is just a list of what it does, making the draft show a WP:ROTM corporation

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grupo Minero Las Cenizas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punta Totoralillo has been accepted

Punta Totoralillo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fundición Chagres has been accepted

Fundición Chagres, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Earth605^talk 08:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Catedral (prospect). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating a page for this large mining prospect; concise and clear. It would now be helpful to link it from places other than the disambiguation page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

• Klbrain, thank you for the notice. I have remedied the issue you raised. Ingminatacam (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Fundición Chuquicamata. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this new page on a Copper smelter. While it seems reasonable to keep this as a separate page, readers might be better served by discussing this with its associated mine, Chuquicamata. This also applies to the other Codelco smelters. I also wonder whether, given that English titles are preferred, readers might be better served by moving the page to Chuquicamata smelter if this is the name used more often in English sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 01:52, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@Klbrain:, Thanks for the patrolling. Fundición Chuquicamata is part of a series of articles on Chile's seven copper smelters (e.g. Fundición Caletones, Fundición Altonorte). These are important items of heavy industry in Chile and Chile is the world's leading producer of copper. Each of them is encyclopedically relevant enough to warrant an own article. Mining and smelting are different processes and Fundición Chuquicamata also serves the neaby mines of Ministro Hales and Radomiro Tomic which are also owned by Codelco and lie close to Chuquicamata. Ingminatacam (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

That's very reasonable. What do you think of the use of the term 'Fundición' rather than 'Smelter' (or an similar English term) for the series, given WP:ENGLISH? Klbrain (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@Klbrain:, I have though about this also, but I have not thought nor investigared long enough to reach definitive conclusion. If you are confident about renaming please go ahead, but please do it on all seven Chilean smelter articles. I am most concerned that all smelters are named consistently. In that case I wonder if "smelter" should be capitalized, mines in Chile are so far not capitalized (e.g. Radomiro Tomic mine) but I have seen articles on other mines capitalized. Ingminatacam (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I checked on ngram, and there is more use of Caletones Smelter in the English corpus. Regarding capilatization, the use seems rather split: smelter seems marginally ahead, but it's a close call! For Altonorte Altonorte smelter looks much stronger Klbrain (talk) 02:27, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Santo Domingo mine. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to write this article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 07:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on 2025 El Teniente mining accident. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to write this article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:58, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sociedad Nacional de Minería

Hello, Ingminatacam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sociedad Nacional de Minería, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ingminatacam. Thank you for your work on Patiño Mines & Enterprise Consolidated Inc.. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:El Alto mining project

Hello, Ingminatacam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:El Alto mining project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lithium carbonate, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industry standard was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Fundación Terram moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fundación Terram. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and these sources should be independent of the subject of the article.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I saw that a category you created, Category:Chilean companies established in 2025 has not been used on more than one page. According to the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization, categories should be populated with multiple articles. Please help by adding other articles to the categories you create. You can take a look at the categorization FAQ. If you need further help, feel free to ask me or ask at the Teahouse. oops ^SMason_Garrison 00:01, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:La Coipa

Hello, Ingminatacam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:La Coipa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Minpeco moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Minpeco. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PERC Reporting Standard, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business reporting was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chileans in the California gold rush

Hello, Ingminatacam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chileans in the California gold rush, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

FireflyBot, I fully oppose your draftification which is a de facto "soft delete". Please revert it. If you still think the article is unworthy of Wikipedia please initiate a formal deletion procedure. Ingminatacam (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Compañía Minera Huanchaca

Hello, Ingminatacam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Compañía Minera Huanchaca, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Dentren per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dentren. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  PhilKnight (talk) 19:54, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grupo Minero Las Cenizas (July 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Guninvalid, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Grupo Minero Las Cenizas to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

guninvalid (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2026 (UTC)