User talk:Ich
Add topic
Nomination of Brauerei Kaiserdom for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brauerei Kaiserdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Allan Nonymous (talk) 19:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kaiserdom Brewery Logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Kaiserdom Brewery Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blood quantum laws, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freehold.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Stochastic Terrorism entry
[edit]Ich -- because I had edited a reference to my own work on that page, I have been tagged for Conflict of Interest and they stripped out a bunch of stuff. I at least had someone to leave the reference for the illustrations. Just for your reference, here are two new papers that look at the numerical side of Stochastic Terrorism instead of the layman/political one: Leveraging Behavioral Analytics to Prevent Lone-Actor Terrorism in the United States: A Scoping Review; and The Mathematics of Political Mayhem: A Computational Model for Predicting Stochastic Violence.
I looked at your profile. I'll be back in Berlin in December. I grew up there for three years (74-77) and went to JFK Gemeinschaftsschule Berlin. Tchuss Bartman82 (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Bartman82 and @Ich,
- In case it's helpful I took a look at the first reference and am very hesitant to use it at first glance since the only mentions of stochastic terrorism are in reference to the 2022 symposium paper you wrote that I'm similarly not sure is reliable enough for inclusion. Also, the lead author is a PhD candidate and cannot find indicators of reliability for the journal on Wikipedia (such as an article or evidence of citations).
- As for the second paper, it is already referenced twice in the article but may be worth citing more thoroughly given it is recent and from a reputable journal. It also, I should note, cites your symposium paper. Not sure whether that is a conflict of interest in such a small field but I wanted to flag for Ich just in case. Superb Owl (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- I sent that to Ich. These popped up in my academic interest feed. Ich had found my papers and sought me out, so he knows I'm the author of several related papers as well as someone who was active in anti-terrorism. Since he was interested in my work, including asking me to edit his post, I am sending him things with respect to those that was relate to my work for his consideration. As you said, Ich did good work before. ~2026-29806-91 (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the pings Bartman82 & Superb Owl. At this point I've done about as much article content as I'm realistically able to – I'm a layperson who took an interest in the topic and did a bunch of reading and wiki-ing, which was enough to get the article to the point where it was 2+1⁄2 years ago. I'm glad to see how much better it has gotten with the attention it has had since then, but where it is now, I'm out of my depth. I know Wikipedia encourages academics to write about their areas of expertise – with policies like WP:SELFCITE that I haven't had occasion to engage with – but haven't had time to follow any of the COI discussions. A thanks again to you both for the work you've put into the page.-Ich (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Tea Party Protests edit
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Protest_paradigm&diff=prev&oldid=1356534126
Hi there, thanks for adding to the protest paradigm article. I'm reaching out because the edit you made seems to have been cut off. I implemented a temporary fix but I'd love for you to finish your thoughts in that section if you have the time - thank you! Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Alexandraaaacs1989 Unfortunately for my wiki editing, my offline life has been busy lately, so I'm not able to really dive into the literature and do it justice. It just felt like a glaring omission not to even mention the tea party protests, especially for the contrasts it provided with OWS coverage.-Ich (talk) 22:18, 29 May 2026 (UTC)