Jump to content

User talk:Cabayi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Stwalkerster in topic Stop knowingly violating policies.

Listing for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Kjersti Flaa

[edit source]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Kjersti Flaa has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 22:35, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

[edit source]

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

[edit source]

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox settlement on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 20:31, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Asdx49 again

[edit source]

Back with another sock: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdx49 --Guy Macon (talk) 04:14, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

FYI, since you blocked the anon

[edit source]

Is it possible this was just a logged out admin by accident? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Vandal_or_logged_out_admin_and_AFD_oddnessVery Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

No. Consider tnis contribution and think about what happens when ~~~~ is parsed. Cabayi (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ohhhh. OK, I get it now. — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 15:58, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Stop knowingly violating policies.

[edit source]

Do you know better than to reintroduce false info to a page? Apparently not. You just did so. diff. Despite participating in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Advice_to_T-Mobile_IPv6_users#Challenge_reintroduction_of_false_info. Where the false info you would be introducing was itemized. Could you at least acknowledge that one should Preserve appropriate content? It is policy! Can you acknowledge that? {{helpme}} Admin Cabayi appears to be knowingly violating policy, as noted above.

  1. Can I get some help getting the behavior issue addressed?
  2. Can I get some help reversing the reintroduction of false info?

RememberOrwell (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm an uninvolved editor, but I agree with Amanda that your revisions have made the page much harder to understand, especially due to the incorrect formatting/html syntax of your edits. If the previously mentioned issues are addressed, other editors may be more open to your revisions. I would also advise you to continue this discussion at the original location of Wikipedia talk:Advice to T-Mobile IPv6 users instead. This request for help template is mainly meant for your own talk page. FlammablePizza (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also here as an uninvolved editor, but summoning people with the help request template and making sweeping claims that someone is violating policy usually better be backed up with good evidence - especially when I can see that this is nothing more than a content dispute, and not even one over an encyclopedia article. I'll also point out (as zzuuzz has already done so on the original talk page discussion) that not all of the "false info" you're complaining about is actually false - there's at least one point you're very wrong on. I'd advise you to take a step back and try to work collaboratively rather than screaming blue murder over a minor disagreement. stwalkerster (talk) 23:00, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply