User talk:BetsyRogers
Add topicEditing - Pharmacology outline
|
|---|
Editing⬇️[edit]Pharmacology outline Title: Pharmacology Overview[edit](Definition, etc) Etymology[edit]History[edit]Origins of Pharmacology ( ___ B.C.)[edit]18th & 19th centuries[edit]Modern Pharmacology[edit]-pharmacology research, general info small paragraph -medical applications, general general info Scientific Principles of Pharmacology[edit]overview[edit]incl background knowledge fields, e.g organic chem, biochem, cell bio, synthetic chem? etc) drug mechanism of action[edit]pharmacodynamics[edit]pharmacokinetics[edit]toxicology[edit]pharmacogenomics[edit]Medical Pharmacology, Therapeutics[edit]overview[edit]applied pharmacology, i.e. relates to pharmacy practice, medical practice, clinical trials drug classification[edit]-chemical class (can apply to multiple organ systems) -organ systems (can include multiple drug classes) -disease types (can impact multiple organ systems and include multiple drug classes) patient safety[edit]-drug toxicity (mechanisms, signs, and risk factors) -drug interactions (drug-drug, drug-food, drug-supplement) -drug dependency Drug Discovery, Drug Development[edit]overview[edit]Drug design[edit]Preclinical research & development[edit]Clinical research, clinical trials[edit]Drug Safety[edit]Drug Efficacy[edit]Regulatory oversight[edit]Emerging fields[edit]-e.g., drugs + gut microbiome External Sources[edit]https://www.britannica.com/science/pharmacology https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/drugs/drug-dynamics/drug-action https://www.bumc.bu.edu/ppb/pharmacology-glossary/ |
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Betsy Rogers! I noticed your contributions to Kroger and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Sahaib (talk) 06:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virus quantification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Substrate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Potassium permanganate (medical use) into Potassium permanganate. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. Thank you for contacting me about this. I was actually trying to merge the "Potassium permanganate (medical use)" page into the larger "Potassium permanganate" page, since there's a lot of overlapping/duplicate information between the two pages. For some reason I assumed the original contributors' info would remain linked to the text. But I realize now that doesn't make much sense.🤦🏻♀️
- - I did make a note in the Talk page about this, per instructions from a help article here, but maybe I misunderstood something.
- I could try to revert/undo the changes involving copied text, if that would be best. There would still be the original problem of the pages having overlapping information, (and sometimes conflicting information), so any suggestions you have on how best to address that would be welcome.
- Thank you Betsy Rogers (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, BetsyRogers, and welcome to Women in Red. Thanks for your contribution to the WiR talk page. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When you feel ready to create your first biography, you'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules: Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing.--Ipigott (talk) 11:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)T
Women in Red - November 2025
[edit]Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - November 2025
[edit]
- Issue 25—November 2025
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
A lot has happened in the WikiProject over the last 11 months. Next year promises to continue that trend with Vital Signs 2026, a campaign to achieve our goal of having all our top-importance articles at B-class or above.
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- Asthma, HIV/AIDS and Meningitis are all in need of some tender love and care, with a median source date between 2008 and 2011. Many clinical guidelines note changes from earlier versions, so updating diagnosis and management sections may be doable even if you have less time on your hand.
- Interested in which articles were most edited recently? That feature is back after a year hiatus. Recently, the Discussion overview stopped working. Can you help get it fixed or replace it?
- Excited about the Vital Signs campaign? Sign up as an organiser or participant!
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Undos
[edit]Just so you know – there is a straightforward way to revert multiple edits simultaneously. On the "history" tab, select the start and end versions of the black of edits that you want to undo using the radio buttons on the left-hand side and click the "compare selected revisions" button. That gives you a page showing the combined differences from all that set of edits. Then click the "undo" link to undo all of the intervening edits. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you!! I knew there was a way to do that but I couldn't remember exactly how. :-) BetsyRogers (talk) 08:50, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Vital signs 2026 project
[edit]Would you perhaps be interested in co-organising the campaign? There's a lot of things to be done if we want to make it successful, like reviving the medical collaboration of the month, finding new and old editors to work together on this, keeping the WikiProject newsletter up and running to keep people interested etc. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I'm not able to commit to a coordinating role right now, but I could absolutely help with the smaller tasks. BetsyRogers (talk) 20:05, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- Following up: I definitely would be interested in working on lede sections that need improvement. (I do that somewhat compulsively already :-) ). BetsyRogers (talk) 20:58, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - December 2025
[edit]Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - January 2026
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Vital Signs 2026
[edit]Hello, I hope you are enjoying 2026 thus far! I'm reaching out to you since you signed yourself up as a participant of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026. To get the ball rolling on this project, I'd like to invite you to help fill out the progress table. If you (like me) have a hard time figuring out tables, I'd suggest editing it in the visual editor to make it easier. Just chose any article from the table and check for the following:
- Sources - are they recent (last 10 years, in accordance with WP:MEDDATE)? Are the sources from a reliable source (I personally use the script User:Headbomb/unreliable to aid in this)? Is there an over relliance on WP:PRIMARY sources?
- Coverage - Does the article cover the main aspects of the topic? Sometimes it can be helpful to check the article template for the topic to see if there is any major gaps in information (Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Article_templates). WP:MEDSECTIONS also provides an easy overview to the various sections. Are there areas where the article goes into too much detail?
- Accuracy - This one ties into the last two and mostly checks for WP:DUE weight as well as factual errors. Keep an eye out for primary sources such as case studies or extremely old sources being used to support something that is phrased as a fact.
- Prose - Can be a bit tricky to judge at first but I'd recommend not getting too hung up on this one. Simply focus on if the articles wording is readable and can be understood. If you find that the way something is written gives you a headache then the prose is probably needing some work.
- Images and infobox - Is there some images included in the article to aid in understanding? Are there tables with unclear information?
- Understandability - Is the WP:LEDE understandable to a casual reader or does it require in depth knowledge of the topic? Is the easiest to understand information presented first with details given later on?
After that you just need to copy and paste the current assessment rating. You can also sign yourself up as a volunteer to help improve the page and add any notes that may help others. Feel free to to tackle as many or as little of these articles as you would like, and if you only feel comfortable assessing some of the criteria that's okay too, any bit helps!
If you're looking for some articles that need some love the following articles are assessed as C class: addiction, allergy, anemia, autism, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, COVID-19 vaccine, cancer, cataract, diarrhea, enteritis, health effects of tobacco, kidney disease, mental disorder, and stroke.
Feel free to ask question on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026, my talkpage, or in response to this message! IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 18:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - January 2026
[edit]
- Issue 26—January 2026
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Happy New Year from WikiProject Medicine. Last year was tumultuous, with large language models competing for readers’ attention. These models often sound authoritative despite frequent hallucinations. They are however effective at writing in clear, accessible language, something research shows we often fail to achieve in medical articles. One of the goals of the Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to ensure that our top-importance articles are understandable, as this is one of the six B-class criteria they should meet.
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- 2025 saw one Arbitration case related to WikiProject Medicine, related to conduct around transgender healthcare and people. The case saw a number of editors banned or topic-banned.
- Thanks to Earwig, recent article talk discussions are updated again at WP:MED, so you never miss an interesting discussion. Our participant list is working too!
- The Vital Signs campaign has kicked off. We've already removed misinformation from breast cancer, updated the management section of asthma, and assessed what needs to happen at autism. Can you help too?
- Adopt an article, fix obvious mistakes, and assess if it now meets the B-class criteria in the progress table
- Help out with any of the smaller tasks, such as ensuring that the new ICD-11 codes are included, or updated the disease frequency and mortality with the Global Burden of Disease study, published last October.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2026
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 22:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - March 2026
[edit]
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red – April 2026
[edit]
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red – May 2026
[edit]
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2026
[edit]
Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi BetsyRogers. Thank you for your work on Laparotomy sponge. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
not mentioned in target page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
July 2026
[edit]Events:
Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--MSGJ (talk 22:11, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging










