User talk:Babin Mew

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Description titles of pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahaganj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subdivision. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will change it. Babin Mew (talk) 08:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Babin Mew! Your additions to Sahaganj Dunlop Factory have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 15:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sahaganj Dunlop Factory moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sahaganj Dunlop Factory. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory. Thanks! Spinster300 (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article not appearing on Google, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sahaganj Dunlop Factory (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 10:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Babin Mew! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiMentor01 (talk) 10:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Your edit to Bandel–Howrah Local has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mone Pore Ruby Roy has been accepted

Mone Pore Ruby Roy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 02:17, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory. Thanks! Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 02:20, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Early life of Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Early life of Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sarat_Chandra_Chattopadhyay#Early_life. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sarat_Chandra_Chattopadhyay#Early_life. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 10:59, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santosh Mitra Square has been accepted

Santosh Mitra Square, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sahaganj Dunlop Factory (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coby Persin (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Htanaungg were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coby Persin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Htanaungg (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Non-free image, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for creating the page Ei Poth Jodi Na Shesh Hoy (song). A real Bengali classic after all! BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Indexing possibility, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Klebitz

Hey bud, I hate to be one to poo poo new article creations, but I do have to say that I'm concerned about the number of unreliable or marginally reliable sources. For example, SVG and WhatCulture are both unreliable per the Video games WikiProject's reliable sources database. Further, when constructing articles, I like to have at least three good sources to serve as a reliable anchor for notability. Can you identify what you think the three strongest sources used in the article are? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:05, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rhain has removed the unreliable and most of the marginally reliable sources. It should be mostly fine for the sources now. Babin Mew (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnny Klebitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Johnny Klebitz is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Johnny Klebitz is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 13:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Johnny Klebitz has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Johnny Klebitz has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SignedInteger -- SignedInteger (talk) 01:24, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, CC 2.0, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Johnny Klebitz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Klebitz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Klebitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnny Klebitz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnny Klebitz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnny Klebitz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnny Klebitz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Coffee Houser Sei Addata

On 4 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coffee Houser Sei Addata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lyricist of "Coffee Houser Sei Addata" wrote its last lyrics on a cigarette packet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coffee Houser Sei Addata. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Coffee Houser Sei Addata), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Coffee Houser Sei Addata is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Coffee Houser Sei Addata is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

S M Moniruzzaman page

Good day Mr. Babin Mew. I am the personal secretary of Mr. S M Moniruzzaman sir. It would be very helpful if you did not edit the texts I have been doing as per sir’s direction. Thank you for understanding. Nrkey56 (talk) 02:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have no problem with you being the secretary of Mr. S. M. Moniruzzaman. However, the edits you had made appear to add unreferenced text to the page. Unreferenced content is generally discouraged in Wikipedia, and especially not allowed for the pages of a living person. Since the article or page about Mr. Moniruzzaman is about a living person, almost all of the text present in it should be sourced. References are those blue bracketed numbers after a period. All of the text in the page about him is referenced. Addition of only text to pages about living persons without any references is not allowed, and will be removed. If there are reliable references (sources) that fully support the content being added, then please feel free to add it. Reliable sources are by trusted news publications, books and websites. Blog sites, or self-published websites are not allowed. Without violating copyright protection, the text found in a reliable source may be added. So generally, unreferenced content on pages about living persons is not allowed, even if you have permission from the person who the page is about. This page is helpful regarding the policies of Wikipedia. If you plan on adding content supported by sources or references, then you may list the references here, replying to this post, so that I can dictate which sources are reliable and can be used.

TL;DR: All text on articles about living persons must be fully referenced. Addition of unreferenced content is prohibited. Babin Mew (talk) 07:28, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Completionist Barnstar
		Thanks for creating Coffee Houser Sei Addata. A page for an evergreen classic, that well sourced, is surely a significant inclusion to Wikipedia. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:53, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My second barnstar! Babin Mew (talk) 05:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Place to ask for checking reliable sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Bibliography article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How do they do this?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory

Hello, Babin Mew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sahaganj Dunlop Factory, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Babin Mew! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Conversion of non-free media into free media, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Coby Persin

Hello, Babin Mew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coby Persin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Shey Amar Choto Bon

Hello! Your submission of Shey Amar Choto Bon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:33, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have also left a comment at Template:Did you know nominations/Amay Ektu Jayga Dao. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:36, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Birthplace of Sukanta Bhattacharya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birthplace of Sukanta Bhattacharya, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birthplace of Sukanta Bhattacharya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations \| June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your efforts to uphold the Bengali culture are worth noting. Ei article tar tulona hoy na. (banglay na bole parlam na) Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 03:07, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I had the idea that this song would be highly notable. Khub dhonnobad. Babin Mew (talk) 04:15, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Apni Kolkata naki? Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 04:40, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Na. Babin Mew (talk) 04:48, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Cabayi (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A small token of appreciation!

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		A toast to your tireless efforts in preserving the Bengali culture and literature on Wikipedia. Articles on deeply rooted Bengali emotions, such as the Photograph of Sukanta Bhattacharya, Amay Ektu Jayga Dao and Amay Prashna Kare Neel Dhrubatara reflect your dedication towards expanding the digital library of notable Bengali topics. Keep up the good work! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 16:03, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]