Jump to content

Talk:Pol Pot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 days ago by Jonas1015119 in topic Misinterpretations


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Philip Short book

[edit]

Hi, I've noticed a lot of information in this article relies on this one sole source. I couldn't find any other sources to independently verify that he lived in the Silver Pagoda, so I deleted that info. I think we should work toward adding another independent source to verify the information quoted by this book. Entychologist (talk) 23:13, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 June 2026

[edit]
Many claimed that he deviated from orthodox Marxism–Leninism, but China and the United States supported his government as a bulwark against Soviet influence in Southeast Asia during the Sino-Soviet split.
+
Many claimed that he deviated from orthodox Marxism–Leninism, but China and later the United States supported his movement as a bulwark against Soviet influence in Southeast Asia during the Sino-Soviet split.

The current wording incorrectly implies that the US supported the Khmer Rouge government (1975-1979). That is not even an accusation by any serious source. The US has been accused of supporting them during their insurgency following their overthrow in 1979. The US also earlier opposed the Khmer Rouge and supported the Cambodian government that was overthown in 1975 as noted earlier in the lead.

Changing "government" to "movement" makes the statement broader so it covers the Khmer Rouge in general as both a government and insurgency. China supported them throughout while the US later allegedly supported them after they were overthrown. See the following page for more info which is actually linked in that sentence: Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge. ~2026-37399-21 (talk) 21:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done. I concur with ~2026-37399-21's statement that the revised language better reflects both this article and the linked article Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge, which refer to incidents that took place after Pol Pot's deposition by Vietnam.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:43, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Misinterpretations

[edit]

The following two sentence seem to be at least a case of misinterpretation, they should probably be clarified with better sourcing or removed. The first ones seems like a misunderstanding of either Petite bourgeoisie or the concept of a Classless society under communism. "sought to eradicate the working class" is an extraordinary claim that needs explanation.

The second sentence is most likely about conflict with communist Vietnam and the broader Sino-Soviet split. Being avowed Maoists isn't exactly "renouncing communism".

"Despite their Marxist pretences, the Khmer Rouge sought to eradicate the working class, seeing it as a "decadent relic of the past". The Khmer Rouge also renounced communism in 1977, with Ieng Sary stating "We are not communists ... we are revolutionaries [who do not] belong to the commonly accepted grouping of communist Indochina.""jonas (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply