Talk:Hyperlocal
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Re-creation
[edit]Have just Recreated this page. At the point of recreation the following was showing:
Warning: You are recreating a page that was previously deleted.
You should consider whether it is appropriate to continue editing this page. The deletion and move log for this page are provided here for convenience:
- 05:46, 22 August 2009 Skier Dude (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Hyperlocal" (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)
Merge with Hyperlocal
[edit]Strongly agree. The two topics are (or should be) the same. hjuk (talk) 10:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
This entry reads like an arts graduate text that would be unintelligible to people unfamiliar with the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.218.48 (talk) 11:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Hyperlocality is also used in mobile applications to show local listings and results. Hyperlocality — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.123.221.197 (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Online Neighbourhood Netwworks Study
[edit]Notability is used only when judging the desirability of a whole article and anyway the research would very likely pass even that test. For a minor reference in an article you'd need to be looking at Due Weight. hjuk (talk) 22:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Journatic
[edit]Should Journatic be mentioned on this page? --Bejnar (talk) 12:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Citation
[edit]Some parts of this article lack references to relevant literature. Appropriate additions can be made, such as in the content section.
Wikipedia Artefiction
[edit]A weird collection of wideley disparate topics, even stranger when you consider interwiki links.
At face value it seems obviously to be a marketing emphasis of some sort, esp. considering the size definition of 50k. That's a medium size town in most places. What's "hyper" about that?
Do we want superlocal, superduperlocal and expialidociousylocal too? All of these are trivial compounds, and need a lot more than a google search to become notable. If they are, the article should reflect that.
Currently it's an amorphous mess and should be deleted. ~2026-17954-96 (talk) 07:01, 13 May 2026 (UTC)